General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCayman Islands to Disclose Tax Shelter Companies
After decades of secrecy, the tax-haven country is considering a public database that will make the names of thousands of previously hidden companies and their directors, public.
CIMA, the three-islands monetary authority has outlined plans to create a public database of funds domiciled on the island for the first time, reports The Telegraph.
The island nation is a group of three islands; Grand Cayman, Little Cayman and Cayman Brac in the Western Caribbean Sea. The country is a British dependent territory and has gained popularity around the world for its offshore financial centre. The Cayman Islands is the worlds fifth (5th) largest financial off-shore centre for tax sheltering activities.
Tax shelters have been described as helping to reduce tax liabilities, tax planning and asset protection. Many USA companies, including Facebook, have been using tax-shelters to avoid paying more taxes.
Since the onset of the worldwide financial crisis, key financial regulatory institutions have been asking tax-haven countries to be more transparent in their operations.
http://www.progressivepress.net/cayman-islands-to-disclose-tax-shelter-companies/
Hope Romney and friends have lots of clean undies.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)PLENTY
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)that we can do, or will do.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)this information?
Skittles
(153,160 posts)but people might start demanding changes to the perks rich assholes get if they realized it's a major reason why social security and medicare are now political footballs
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)about American money in Switzerland? The only thing that happened was he got in a hell of a lot of trouble.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)The whistle-blower is now free and was recently awarded two and a half million dollars in reward money by the IRS.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)If I remember correctly, the IRS did manage to recover quite a bit of cash through negotiations with the tax dodgers, but identities were protected in return.
In Greece a former finance minister is facing criminal charges for not prosecuting Greek millionaires who were also caught hiding cash tax free in the same scandal.
Maraya1969
(22,480 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Now they will have to explain how all their money came to be in an offshore account without being documented.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)asking because I dont know.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)a list of names of Americans that were hiding their money in Switzerland was revealed by a whistle-blower. As far as I know, nothing happened except the whistle-blower was fired and will probably never work in banking again.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)However, the list was not released to the public. The whistle-blower did have to serve a brief jail sentence for his participation in tax fraud, but has recently been released and was awarded a 2.4 million dollar reward from the IRS.
BadgerKid
(4,552 posts)I recalled this coming out last year. I'm too tired to figure out if there was an actual causative effect.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Think of the last time you traveled out of country and you were required to state if you had an excess of $10,000 dollars.
This will also make it harder for money-launderers.
As for the amounts, I don't have an answer but that will probably not happen.
SamHarris2012
(42 posts)It makes a huge difference if you ask me. Folks will no longer be able to hide their money. It will be out in the open.
Remember that scene in Mission Impossible with Tom Cruise? The part where he says, "The list is in the open."
When this list gets in the open, people will finally see how much money these fat cats have and how little they pay in taxes.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Most of them would be more ashamed of having their peers know or think that they did NOT have a tax dodge than they would be if they were named on some list of offshoring tax cheats. As to what the 99% think of them, they really do not give a shit. This is difficult for some to accept. They hate you and if you hate them, they feel all the more justified in fucking you over.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)What if Willard (Mitt) Romney had won? Can you imagine the scramble to contain fallout from the truth about part of his off-shore finances being made public on the very eve of his inauguration?
Since he lost it will be less important, but still icing on the cake of victory.
Autumn
(45,082 posts)just to make damn sure no info got out.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)They would be a smoking ruin by Monday morning. I doubt it not.
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)...then all hell would break loose. The USA would be scrambling to get out of Europe - fast. In any case, no bombing would happen even if Mr Romney got the Presidency (very unlikely now).
Autumn
(45,082 posts)for instance, Iraq.
spanone
(135,831 posts)mwooldri
(10,303 posts)Considering the Caymans are a Crown Dependency and all that. It wouldn't be just America that would benefit from this.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Who wants to hold a roll of nickels for me and keep it hush hush?
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)They will stop my food stamps.
SamHarris2012
(42 posts)I'm pretty sure many countries are tying to get additional revenue. These rich folks can't keep hiding their money forever. Some country will always declare jurisdiction over it. So the question becomes, which country do I want to pay taxes in? Because some country will lay claim on these accounts.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Was that he took advntage of a 2009 IRS amnesty on reporting these sorts of offshore accounts.
It would have been legal, but in black and white- and would have looked bad.
In that case, Romney personally might now be legit; but no doubt others of his pals may not have done the same thing.