Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts)
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 02:27 AM Jan 2013

Pennsylvania judge rules against firm that challenged health care law

The Hahn family, which owns Conestoga Wood Specialties, plans to appeal the decision, their lawyer, Charles Proctor III, said.

Judge Goldberg noted the very purpose of incorporation is to create a legal entity distinct from those who start it, partly to protect the founders from personal legal and financial liability.

"If every plaintiff were permitted to unilaterally determine that a law burdened their religious beliefs, and courts were required to assume that such burden was substantial, simply because the plaintiff claimed that it was the case, then the standard expressed by Congress under the RFRA would convert to an 'any burden' standard," he said.

Brigitte Amiri of the American Civil Liberties Union in New York, which filed an amicus brief advocating against the injunction, said, "This decision reaffirms the idea that taking a job isn't the same as joining a church."


Read more: link


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pennsylvania judge rules against firm that challenged health care law (Original Post) yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2013 OP
That decision appears to be thoughtful and well-written. pnwmom Jan 2013 #1
"This decision reaffirms the idea that taking a job isn't the same as joining a church". alittlelark Jan 2013 #2
"The "nature, history and purpose" of the freedom to practice religion clause is purely personal" yortsed snacilbuper Jan 2013 #3

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
2. "This decision reaffirms the idea that taking a job isn't the same as joining a church".
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 04:45 AM
Jan 2013

uhhhhhh yeah.

One gives you $ to support your lifestyle, the other is a GOP wet dream.

yortsed snacilbuper

(7,939 posts)
3. "The "nature, history and purpose" of the freedom to practice religion clause is purely personal"
Mon Jan 21, 2013, 12:16 PM
Jan 2013

We need more judges like this!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pennsylvania judge rules ...