Mitch Daniels: Bombast From the Past
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/mitch_daniels_bombast_from_the_past_20120126/?ln
Mitch Daniels: Bombast From the Past
Posted on Jan 26, 2012
By Joe Conason
Why the Republicans chose Mitch Danielsthe Indiana governor who once thrilled right-wing pundits as a 2012 hopefulto deliver a rebuttal to President Obamas State of the Union address is puzzling. His uninspiring remarks surely killed the Daniels fad, revived lately as Republicans fret over the unappetizing choices available in their primaries.
By shining the spotlight on Daniels, the Republicans risked losing much more than a political rescue fantasy. He isnt merely a politician who looks like an accountant; he actually was an accountantor at least he played one during the Bush years, when he served as director of the Office of Management and Budget.
Listening to him drone on about fiscal rectitude just might have reminded voters of the true source of our national problems.
Mitch Daniels ... Isnt he the former Bush budget director who said the Iraq War would cost $50 billion when it ended up costing $3 trillion? The bureaucrat who promoted the Bush tax cuts when we were fighting two wars? The one whose budget projections were so fraudulent that he predicted federal surpluses in 2004 and 2005? Why the hell should we listen to him criticize Obama?
That last is a highly pertinent question, although whether most viewers could watch Daniels long enough to ask it may be doubtful. Honest economic analysis shows that the great bulk of the deficits going forward stem from spending and taxation decisions made during the Bush era, which Obama is now doing his best to remedy, by bringing troops home from Iraq and ending the Bush tax cuts.
snip//
He is far from the worst in his party, but he is no political savior. With nothing to lose, he could have served a real purpose by challenging his own party to confront basic facts about spending and taxes that he could not avoid as governor.
He is fortunate that this political momentand his choice of pander over candorwill be instantly forgotten.