General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDr. Cornel West Takes Issue With President Barack Obama Taking Oath With Martin Luther King Jr.'s Bi
Dr. Cornel West, Union Theological Seminary Professor, was recently on C-Span for a discussion on Poverty in America where he addressed an interesting aspect of President Barack Obamas oath that made his "blood boil."
West spoke out against the idea of President Obama sworn in to office with his hands on Martin Luther King Jr.s bible.
In the video clip below you can hear West explain it as, When I got the news that my dear brother Barack Obama, President Obama, was going to put his precious hand on Martin Luther King Jr.s bible I got upset. And I got upset because, you dont play with Martin Luther King Jr. and you dont play with his people. By his people what I mean is people in good conscience, fundamentally committed to piece and truth and justice.
West goes on to explain how this situation offended him.
All the blood sweat, and tears that went into producing a Martin Luther King Jr. generated a brother of such high decency and dignity that you dont use his prophetic fire as just a moment in presidential pageantry without understanding the challenge that he presents to all of those in power no matter what color they are, no matter what color they are. So the righteous indignation of a Martin Luther King Jr. becomes a moment in political calculation and that makes my blood boil.
West proceeds to highlight the three crimes against humanity to which Martin Luther King Jr. died fighting against Jim Crow, carpet-bombing in Vietnam, and poverty of all colors including Indian reservations, in brown boroughs, and yellow slices, and black ghettos.
So I say to myself, brother Martin Luther King Jr. what would you say about the new Jim Crow? What would you say about the prison industrial complex? What would you say about the invisibility of so many of our prisoners, so many of our incarcerated, especially when 62 percent of them are there for soft drugs, but not one executive of a Wall Street bank gone to jail? . Martin what would you say about the poverty in America now?
http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2013/01/22/dr-cornel-west-takes-issue-president-barack-obama-taking-oath-martin-luther-king-jrs
I don't really have an opinion on whether President Obama should have used Martin Luther King's bible or not, but I was interested in what DU thinks. I think Cornel West makes some strong points.
blogslut
(38,000 posts)Cornel West sure can hold a grudge.
Getting tired of him. Too bad, 'cause I used to admire him.
Number23
(24,544 posts)I used to do more than admire the man. I had a crush on him like a teenaged girl. Love him for years. Even endured after that bizarre cameo of him in The Matrix.
But his comments about President Obama have disgusted me to the core and have exposed him as a shallow, petty man who obviously believes that his feelings are more important than anything else. You should see what we say about him in the AA Group here. It ain't pretty. And the sentiment is shared among many black journalists, academics and pundits.
elleng
(130,895 posts)Has appeared that he's been a shallow, petty man for some time. And he WAS handsome, so don't blame you for the crush!
Number23
(24,544 posts)But for years, I was enthralled by his brain and the way he saw the world which very much mirrored how I did. I took every opportunity to see him in person, even gave money to Grifter of the Century Tavis Smiley to see Cornel.
And then Obama happened. And the thing that made him so beautiful to me (his thoughts and words) suddenly made him the ugliest damn thing I've ever seen. It is so true when they say that jealousy and hatred make you ugly body and soul.
elleng
(130,895 posts)and sad.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)How can anyone put Obama on such a pedestal that it is wrong to say the things that Cornel West says?
I'm not surprised that this would turn into a hatefest on Cornel West though.
If MLK were alive he would be a staunch critic of most of Obama's policies.
We know this for a fact based on MLK's approach to LBJ, a president much more liberal than many Democrats we have today.
The fact that Obama is so willing to play off MLK's legacy and explicitly cast himself as the culmination of the Dream, that he took the oath twice in order to land the inauguration on MLK day (and preempt the observation of a memorial holiday) is what saddens me.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Support this president.
You may not see this president as a culmination of Dr. King's dream, but I and a boatload of other black people see it as a very big landmark on the way to the culmination. And you be as "sad" as you want. We aren't sad at all.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Although proud that he was elected, They are incredibly disappointed in the man's policies. And so should you be. As a LIBERAL.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Your "black friends" need to school you a bit better.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)I'd offer to put a black friend on the line so you can argue with them, but I won't because they are no different than my white friends.
I don't hang with people who engage in supercilious condescenscion and all-or-nothing hero worship. The world is a complicated, difficult place, full of uncertainty and injustice.
The amount of hate towards Cornel West here is truly impressive... It seems any criticism of Obama has been banished from GD.
union_maid
(3,502 posts)I have black friends who are absolutely lifelong liberals, civil rights activists and intellectuals. Dr. West has nothing on some of them beyond a higher profile. And they support President Obama and do see his presidency as a huge and transformative landmark. It's not the culmination of Dr. King's dream, because there are still many challenges, and there always will be.
This conversation puts me in mind of something that one of my less liberal black friends spoke about several years ago. She has a brilliant son. He was in junior high at the time. He announced that he was planning to be the first black president. He was a very intense and serious kid, so I guess she took this seriously and it concerned her. She thinks of herself as a very tough minded and pragmatic person and she told him that he could be a lot of things, but white America wasn't going to let him be president, so don't even think that way. This was, of course, before. Now all she can say to him is that he can't be the FIRST black president. That's transformative. We'll never be a perfect country, but Barack Obama has made us a better one than we were before and only partly because of his ethnicity.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Given the options,
And I think he was the right person to be the first black President
But I agree with the person who said that his policies are not those of King.
And there doesn't seem to be much aspiration to Cornel West's ideas of liberalism,
in the young people of tomorrow (black or white).
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)The arrogance of people telling other people how they should feel, really burns my butt.
Same arrogance as Dr. West pronouncing on who is and who isn't entitled to revel in MLK's legacy.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)OMFG. And they're ALL disappointed in Obama, too!!!! Every dang one of them. Um hmm. Where have we heard THAT one before? Well, I have a 12-foot-tall mouse.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)I don't live in some segregated shithole like many people seem to.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Please proceed. Really.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)The vast majority of Americans live in segregated communities.
The vast majority of new construction is in gated or pedestrian unfriendly shitholes
Even liberal towns are segregated by class thanks to gentrification.
80% of all new construction is built for the top 5% income earners
The vast majority of new construction is rigidly segregated by class due to "consumer preference"
The vast majority of new construction is controlled by 5 firms, two of which are privately owned.
90% of the wasteland around most American cities is horrid suburban tract homes, segregated by race and class.
Inner city communities are sadly left to rot until they are "fully depreciated" whereupon new construction and services are introduced (as a basic financial requirement) that poor folks must be moved out, ensuring they do not benefit from gentrification.
Like other traditionally liberal groups that moved up from the working class, black people in many urban areas are abandoning the inner city to flee to the suburbs rather than attempt to combat relentless gentrification. The theory is, communities change and in the eyes of many, inner city ethnic neighborhoods (of all stripes) are unsalvageable and doomed to be replaced by affluent, young urban professionals with no kids and little dependence on public services. Who have the time and money to get the city to come in and "fix" those areas. So best move to the (largely and increasingly segregated) suburbs and thereby complete King's Dream.
Integration is mostly taking place due to the burgeoning immigrant population in older residential neighborhoods. But when you look at race, segregation is increasing there, too.
treestar
(82,383 posts)tend to be so conservative or anti-Obama? Very confusing.
I have many black friends too and they support the President. I have even more white friends who do. Liberals. Realistic people, since reality has a liberal bias.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Because they are LIBERALS.
The definition of liberal got twisted somewhere.
To quote an African American blogger who was harshly critical of Cornel West for attacking Obama,
While rank-and-file liberals and moderates continue to hold Obama in high regard, chunks of the professional left still bristle at Obamas centrism. They feel sold out by his compromises on Guantánamo, banks and health care and flatly reject his pursuit of the Afghanistan War.
West decries Obamas leadership of the American killing machine but cant say why, then, he supported Obama who couldnt have made his position any clearer than he did in his second debate with McCain, saying: Part of the reason I think its so important for us to end the war in Iraq is to be able to get more troops into Afghanistan.
On health care, West might be holding out for a bolder legislative solution, but even after Obama and Democrats put forth a recycled Republican plan from the 1990s the individual mandate that Obama opposed in 2008 it still took everything they had to get it passed in Congress.
Still, if theres one place where West can feel justifiably aggrieved, its the presidents broken campaign promise to shut down military detention at Guantánamo Bay. But if theres one thing thats been established during his tenure, its that on any deal, Obama will take half a loaf over none at all. When it came to terror suspects, he declared an end to torture but couldnt find a way to close the dungeon.
No one on the left including West has to be satisfied with the presidents performance. For starters, Obamas not even really on the left. But to perpetuate the notion shared, not coincidentally, by Obamas most fervent right-wing detractors that hes a closet socialist whos only toeing the Middle American line because he lacks backbone doesnt make sense. Its also not befitting West a thinker whose lifes work contributed to making Obamas presidency possible.
If theres one thing West stands for, its the proposition that people from all walks of life have a stake in the American endeavor. So he should be the first one to recognize the first black presidents defining trait: Obama is no revolutionary and he never was.
As you can see, the mainstream thinking in both African American and white urbanite circles is that Obama should not pander to "leftists" like Cornel West because liberalism -- and the left -- is no longer popular amongst urban Dems.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Because mine aren't imaginary friends.
Ecumenist
(6,086 posts)shame against a president who has been blockaded and stopped from implementing the most basic things he wanted to by a GOP who met on the day he was inaugurated to do everything in it's power to oppose E-V-E-R-Y-T-H-I-N-G he was for. Hmmm, must have been the day I was in surgery or maybe it was during my infusion days.. Whaddyaknow? Having "black friends" is NOT the same as knowing what we think if you take that stance because WE ARE NOT HOMOGENOUS anymore than any group here in the US on on PLANET EARTH is.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)What counts as culmination? How many people have to "get theirs?"
King's dream was a speech, a vision of a just world. If you think we are living in a just society today then you are far to the right of King.
But that's OK. The African American community, outside of a few major cities, has always been far to the right of King. As has the white community.
Number23
(24,544 posts)I could give a fuck.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)And clever appeals to pride and common identity instead of common cause with liberal policies.
I've clearly no response to such indifference... You may fire when ready.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)day. I guess his insinuation was both that he violated the Constitution AND that he did it to grandstand on MLK Day. What a sick thing to imply. I set him straight about the Constitution and the oath and that Obama did 2, according to tradition in these situations. I didn't bother with the other insinuation. Too disgusting to wallow in.
Number23
(24,544 posts)as a black person (because you know, we all fucking think/feel the same) then it is truly better for everyone involved for me to not say exactly what I am so clearly thinking.
The thing is, somebody who was actually smart enough to be QUALIFIED to tell me what I should think about something as a black person is probably too damn smart to say something so stupid and offensive in the first place. Their myriad "black friends" notwithstanding.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)But you can go on ignoring that key distinction.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 20, 2021, 05:50 PM - Edit history (1)
It was both King's bible AND his birthday. And unless King's family didn't give Obama consent, or if he obtained the bible via a search warrant, whose business is it anyway?
rocktivity
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)think particularly cares for him. These guys with the last name of West...Are they related 'cause they are definitely talking to listen to themselves. Of course the President should have used Dr. King's bible. Silly question but West has nothing else to complain about.
cali
(114,904 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Cornel West is sometimes extremely offensive.
Indykatie
(3,696 posts)West's and Smiley's criticism of the president is often off base and I have never heard either of them have any good things to say about the president since he was elected. It has negatively affected their credibility in many minds both in and outside the African American community.
goclark
(30,404 posts)See my post in this thread and if you would like, go to my Journal at DU and
you'll see how proud I was to meet Dr. King!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)so he not only "put his little hand" or whatever insulting moronic term west used, the president wrote his name in it?
bwhahaha!
Number23
(24,544 posts)There is in fact, an absolutely tear-jerkingly gorgeous photo of MLK's sister sitting at the inauguration beaming at the president.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-22/barack-obama-delivers-inaugural-address/4477182
Cornel needs to take his unhinged and bitter hatred and go sit his ass down somewhere.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Politicub
(12,165 posts)IMHO.
On edit: But that doesn't mean he isn't a national treasure. I have the utmost respect.
Number23
(24,544 posts)he should be given by this president has made him incredibly bitter and angry.
union_maid
(3,502 posts)Dr. Cornell West hasn't got a leg to stand on.
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)The use of the MLK bible is and will always be a representation of the push for human rights. Barack Obama also strives to improve them.
Cornell has his point of view and I see his sentiments.But when the family of MLK has requested the presidential signature it can not be a unwanted slight to the movement of civil and human rights unless you say that the MLK family has an unethical motive for the signature. I don't think they do.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Not the first time. But I don't want to shut him up. He can say what he likes. That's what I think.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)I don't agree at all. MLK was among those who made it possible for Barack Obama to be President. Additionally, the President is working toward many of Dr. King's goals. No, he is not perfect. Yes, he is too concerned about the banks. But he is much better than other options available. He's doing what he can, and just the ACA law alone is an enormous step toward lessening the most brutal effects of poverty in this country.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)...they did ask him and John Roberts to sign that Bible. And, that says way more to me about what MLK might think than anything Cornell West says.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Would YOU ask John Roberts to sign a family heirloom that belonged to your father, a civil rights activist?
Ik'm sure MLK would have some strong words about the memorial his kids built for him, too (although I do not)
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)along with every liberal african american in the us of a? ha!
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)That's what I think.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)Top Attentionwhore of the ILE.. he wins hands down.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Some of his comments, especially about the President, are sounding increasingly unhinged.
Really a shame.
Cha
(297,188 posts)goclark
(30,404 posts)issues as well ----
West and Tavis want Center Stage but it ain't gonna happen.
Not when Obama is around and not including them in his inner circle.
Go President OBAMA, don't waste your time with "Donald Trump Like Attention
Grabbing " By Any Means Necessary" Clowns
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)He's embarrassing himself. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a MAN, not a saint or a god. Cornell West and Tavis Smiley should get a grip on reality.
ecstatic
(32,701 posts)Every now and then they admit that it's because they weren't consulted with more when Obama was running for president, they didn't get inauguration tickets, and they weren't consulted with after he was elected.
Regarding MLK's bible, I think I'll side with MLK's family and not Cuckoo West.
http://blacksnob.com/snob_blog/2011/5/17/cornel-wests-legitimate-obama-gripe-comes-with-an-unfortunat.html
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)I saw its use in the inauguration as a salute ot the man who owned it, not some attempt to take his mantle.
President Obama did not claim that King approved of the NRA and guns.
He did not claim that King believed in Africans just had guns slavery would not have been an issue.
It was a salute to a man without whom, President Obama would never have even been elected a state Senator.
But I am not a sentimental person who sees objects as endowed by some enduring aspect of their owners.
G_j
(40,367 posts)"I have a dream" or "I have a drone"?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0115-13.htm
Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence
Declaration of Independence from the War in Vietnam
Delivered by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr
April 1967
At Manhattan's Riverside Church
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)There is a DIRECT correlation between MLK's legacy & the success of Barack Obama becoming President of the United States.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Response to Beringia (Original post)
Post removed
Mr Dixon
(1,185 posts)CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)Dr. King's family thought highly of President Obama using the bible, even requesting the President and the Chief Justice sign the bible.
I don't believe that Dr. King's struggles and dreams are lost on President Obama...no doubt Dr. King would not like some of the issues West singles out, but I think he would have been very proud of Barak Obama.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)to the story of the emperor who had no clothes.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but I don't find this stuff amusing
the beat goes on
ProSense
(116,464 posts)I find it hilarious watching the desperation of haters, losing credibility with every slimy criticism dragged-from-the-gutter of small- mindedness.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Read this thread and you will see a lot of hatred.
Hatred directed at Cornel West.
Has he lost credibility?
Well, back in the day, there were many who did not give any credibility to "Bush haters".
But it is always nice to see people who are against bigotry, against poverty and against violence lose credibility in favor of people who are paid big money to enrich the already rich.
The beat goes on.
"Read this thread and you will see a lot of hatred. "
...I see a lot of people calling out a hater for being an ass.
Some people let the fact that they dislike the President cloud their thinking. Good thing the President knows how to focus.
President of the Whole Country
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022237431
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)in his cheerleader uniform.
I suspect many on this thread did not even watch the video. Dr. West is hardly being an a$$ in it.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)It burns some people up when anyone says anything positive about the President.
Krugman: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022224304
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)lie their little pampered a$$es right off.
Makes my day.
But no doubt you can join Krugman, and Romney and Obama, laughing all the way to the bank.
The beat goes on.
"no, I just love it when well paid pundits"
...you think West is not "well paid"? Or do you think the President is a "pundit"?
You seem to want to attack everyone else's credibility, and are offended that anyone would call out West for the petty bullshit in the OP.
"But no doubt you can join Krugman, and Romney and Obama, laughing all the way to the bank."
Keep demonstrating that you don't have a clue.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)"call out West"
I have no problem if somebody wants to try, even a little bit to refudiate what West actually said. But what do we get instead of reasoned argument
reply #1 "Cornel West sure can hold a grudge."
reply #2 "Rocktivity takes issue with Cornell West trolling for a network job"
then something about the King family which isn't all that relevant to the King message.
reply #3 "Cornell West is an idiot. President Obama does not invite him to the White House for any events, and I dont think particularly cares for him. These guys with the last name West ... are they related.
reply #4 "whatthefuckever"
reply #5 "I usually agree with the good Professor, but think he is incorrect here."
reply #6 "and I am not combing my hair until he apologizes"
reply #7 (to reply #1) "really, getting tired of him. Too bad, 'cause I used to admire him."
reply #8 "King's family asked President Obama to sign MLK's Bible. Cornell West is sometimes extremely offensive."
reply #9 "Dr. West occasionally goes off the deep end. Not the first time ..."
reply #10 "I don't agree at all. MLK was among those who made it possible for Barack Obama to be President. Additionally, the President is working towards many of Dr. King's goals. No he is not perfect. Yes, he is too concerned about the banks. But he is much better than other options available. (uhm, yeah, West said that too) He's doing what he can, and just the ACA law alone is an enormous step toward lessening the most brutal effects of poverty in this country."
Okay, I don't really want to parse #10. It is at least the first response with some substance, the first nine being essentially "fuck Cornell West". Not any sort of fact-based rebuttal - just hate.
oh, and it continues beyond that.
West has his head in his a$$. He might have dementia. He's Donald Trump, and so on. Why does anybody care what he says?
Yeah, sure it is WEST who is the hater.
As for "attacking everyone else's credibility". I attacked Krugman's credibility because I showed how what he said was bullshit. I did not just write "Krugman is such a tool" and then "n/t". I took great pains to show WHY Krugman was full of shit. And then I gave a Marxist explanation for WHY Krugman believes what he believes. As Marx would say "people believe what it is in their self interest to believe".
And as for you. Well you do seem to think that tax cuts favoring the rich are just a big fucking joke and anybody who is upset about it is just a big fucking joke too. Not to be listened to or taken seriously.
Not that I can be heard over the RWNM anyway. And who cares? I am just another member of the canaille.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)and, really, any thread at DU that makes a substantive and politically threatening exposure of the corporatist and neocon direction of this administration.
The message control on a post like this is always immediate, predictable, and unrelenting...and, as you point out, it is never based on actual policy. It's important for people to see the pattern.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)this is. His ego was bruised, and ever since, he and Tavis have been out to get revenge.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Dr. West does not care any more about ending poverty, racism or war than Obama does?
I seem to remember West being an a$$ about something or other a few months ago, but just based on what he said in the video in the OP that it would be nice if Obama was inviting people like Dr. West to the White House and listening to people like that instead of listening to people like Larry Summers, Rahm Emmanuel and Timothy Geithner.
Or Pierce on the other hand who thinks that maybe Obama will save America by angering his liberal base.
Whatever his motivations, I don't see why progressives would not cheer what he said, unless they are so enamored of Dear Leader to call sacrilege at anybody who dares criticize his awesome greatness.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)has fallen in love with the sound of his own voice. He would have us believe MLK, Jr. was the messiah returned. I think Dr. King would object to that deification. No one can, or should, deny that Dr. King was taken from us way too soon or that he remains an iconic figure
in the pantheon of great Americans. However, I think Dr. King would have been very pleased to see his bible put to such good use and if he were alive today he would understand the constraints under which the first African American president has had to operate. Every time I hear Dr. West go off on this particular criticism of Obama I wonder just what he would have him do...it's not like he has had cooperative congress with which to work. It was much more important that Obama win a second term, for the betterment of all Americans and perhaps during this second term he can do something...but it is highly unlikely. What is more realistic is that he will make it possible for a Democratic successor to address these very real and tragic issues.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)I gotta say, that I love the sound of West's voice, and the things he says here, and it fits right in to what Martin said here http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022244131
As for Martin being the Messiah, it seems like most people on this thread are prepared to declare Obama as the messiah and woe to anybody who does not bend their knee to the great one.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)I recognize both as men with limitations.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Too bad there's so much hate on the forum towards critics of the Administration...
It's no longer a welcoming place for social justice liberals and lefties.
Say what you want about West, he is a staunch liberal.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)We laugh at the problems the Tea Party has created for the GOP yet way too many of us fail to recognize ourselves in those on the right, we call extremists. The infighting among Democrats is legendary, while for 40 years the GOP had a solidarity that was incredible and terrible in its power.
Dr. West makes good points, but he seems to exist outside of political history. He tends to ignore the fact that it was the civil rights legislation and Affirmative Action that drove so many people, north and south, into the GOP fold. During the 40 years between 1968 and 2008 republicans held the WH 28 years and enjoyed majorities in the congress for a good part of that time. Social Justice was driven into a dark corner while the conservatives on the Supreme Court chipped away at many of the programs that help minorities. Heck, one of the 2 Dems to hold the WH during that time frame made drastic changes to welfare. Throughout the history of mankind, social justice has always followed prosperity. When people are worried about paying their bills, they are not terribly concerned with issues that don't touch their own lives.
Too many Americans are not prosperous, even if they are employed. Democrats have done nothing about the stagnant wages which are responsible for the American love affair with tax cuts. I'm old enough to remember when no self-respecting Democrat would have anything good to say about the Obama Tax Cuts...and make no mistake about it, what we now have, in regard to taxes, can be laid at Obama's door, not Bush's. Yet, there were very few DUers calling for an end to all of the Bush Tax Cuts...we even had some complaining about the expiration of the Payroll Tax Holiday.
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)Because Obama is obviously not exactly like Jesus Christ, so I am offended.
woodsprite
(11,913 posts)Monday was the nationwide celebration of MLKs birth, and he is someone whose words and actions inspire Pres. Obama. I think the use of both Lincoln's and King's Bibles eloquently speaks to everything that America has come through from the days of slaves through the civil rights movement through him being elected President and serving a second term.
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)available, but they were proud to have the President honor their father in that manner. I am sure that Dr. KING would not approve of the pomposity that is Cornell West, who talks a good game but seldom gets in to the fray. How much has he made prostituting himself as a paid speaker for his pseudo crusade for poverty? When he comes correct, he will find support but that blatant fronting won't get him anything. He has turned into a huge competitor for Ann Coulter's title of 'IDIOT'.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)She seemed to have felt pride and perhaps vindicated, watching Obama being sworn in. West and others consider her and the King family too conservative. I believe King would have been glad to see this event unfold, which disappoints so many.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)of Cornell West, not his family.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)And evidently Dr. King's family was happy enough that Pres. Obama used the Bible that they asked him to write an inscription in it. What they think of the situation matters a lot; what Cornell West thinks matters not at all. Using MLK's Bible was obviously a gesture of deep respect for MLK, not an attempt by Obama to "be" him on some way.
West is really getting on my nerves these days.
malaise
(268,967 posts)STFU Cornel - you are your own worst enemy
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)His comments about Newtown were despicable, nothing about his words reflect King's vision.
Cha
(297,188 posts)too, Pro Sense.
I couldn't even comment on that thread because I was so pissed at his divisive insensitive shite.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Sounds like a typical repuke to me, with all that dripping, insincere familiarity with great personages, of whom West will never be, except in his own mind.
Same energy, same clawing at the sacred to use it to shred someone who has been humble and never made any claims of perfection. Would MLK talk that way about Obama, when he didn't talk that way about his enemies?
Which verse was that in the Bible, since I've read the whole thing many times. Let me know which version of the Bible King believed in and which one sustains West.
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)Which isn't an answer to your question, I just find myself wondering that.
In my eyes since Martin Luther King's surviving family approved, and since it was a National day of tribute to Rev. King's contributions to our society, I can't say I agree with Dr. West. However, he has every right to express his opinion.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)come to you and represent themselves as one thing, but are another thing altogether. Be wary of such men."
Or, that's my guess at what he would say.
RudynJack
(1,044 posts)Until Spike Lee weighs in.
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Sure thing, Dr. West.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)that based on what King believed about race, class, and war (especially toward the end of his life), he'd be profoundly critical of the current American Empire no matter who was president.
The last sermon he was working on before he was assassinated, "Why America May Go to Hell," seems particularly prophetic.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Link please?
Look how critical MLK was of LBJ, a true-blue liberal on domestic issues...
America may go to the Nursing Home due to its short attention span, not hell.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)in the first paragraph this article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/mlk/legacy/legacy.htm
There are many references to it out there in the Intertubes.
Here's a link to a speech Coretta Scott King gave three weeks after MLK's assassination. In it, she quotes notes found on her husband's body ("10 Commandments on Vietnam" . Not sure this would've been in his sermon about America and hell, but it was obviously on his mind as he was working on that last sermon.
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/corettascottkingvietnamcommandments.htm
Here's an excerpt of her remarks from April 1968:
My husband always saw the problem of racism and poverty here at home and militarism abroad as two sides of the same coin. In fact, it is even very clear that our policy at home is to try to solve social problems through military means just as we have done abroad.
The interrelatedness of domestic and foreign affairs is no longer questioned. The bombs we drop on the people of Vietnam continue to explode at home with all of their devastating potential. And so I would invite you to join us in Washington in our effort to enable the poor people of this nation to enjoy a fair share of America's blessing.
There is no reason why a nation as rich as ours should be blighted by poverty, disease, and illiteracy. It is plain that we don't care about our poor people except to exploit them as cheap labor and victimize them through excessive rents and consumer prices.
Our Congress passes laws which subsidize corporation farms, oil companies, airlines, and houses for suburbia. But when they turn their attention to the poor, they suddenly become concerned about balancing the budget and cut back on the funds for Head Start, Medicare, and mental health appropriations.
The most tragic of these cuts is the welfare section to the Social Security amendment, which freezes federal funds for millions of needy children, who are desperately poor but who do not receive public assistance. It forces mothers to leave their children and accept work or training, leaving their children to grow up in the streets as tomorrow's social problems. This law must be repealed, and I encourage you to join welfare mothers on May 12th, Mother's Day and call upon Congress to establish a guaranteed annual income, instead of these racist and archaic measures, these measures which dehumanize God's children and create more social problems than they solve.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Cogently articulated.....
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)still_one
(92,187 posts)As republicans!!!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Melissa Harris-Perry was sooooooooo right.....
http://www.thenation.com/blog/160725/cornel-west-v-barack-obama#
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)MurrayDelph
(5,294 posts)and Doctor West can pull his head out of his ass and see if he still has a shadow of relevance.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)So, as usual, fuck off Corny West.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)with post after post of ad-hom attacks on a supposed democratic site. It's too bad, this used to be a great site with great minds capable of reason. In fact, these types of ad-hominem attacks used to be a signaling characteristic of repug websites.
Cornell West is simply telling the truth, I saw him on PBS last night and I suggest anyone with an open mind and a willingness to learn about poverty watch Tavis Smiley's "Vision For a New America".
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"West speaks the truth and shortly thereafter his character assassins begin with post after post of ad-hom attacks on a supposed democratic site."
...West isn't a Democrat. The President is. You're right this is a Democratic site.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022236245
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)thank you for sharing it.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)These responses are something we would see on freerepublic. They are making fun of his hair but not taking a part his argument.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)to take the oath of office for the Presidency.
How fucking petty! RW assholish petty.
He's probably pissed at the King family for asking the President to sign it.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)No one in this thread will make a point-by-point counter argument to address West's main premise "What would Dr. King think of Obama's policies on:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)
I haven't seen one poster address the SUBSTANCE of his argument....because they can't.
Cha
(297,188 posts)on the jealous pettiness of his "blood boiling" about the President using MLK's Bible for his Inaugual Swearing In Ceremony.. that the King Family Approved, BTW.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)poverty with stupid jealous hate.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Would Dr. King support President Barack Obama's handling of:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)?
Cha
(297,188 posts)NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Would Dr. King support President Barack Obama's handling of:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)?
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I have never been quiet. I will never be quiet especially considering Obama won't properly fund education and is complicit in the privatization of our public school system.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)You irrelevant blowhard.
virgogal
(10,178 posts)Pisces
(5,599 posts)kjackson227
(2,166 posts)bad-mouth President Obama. I'm sure if Dr. King were alive today, they'd make derogatory and nasty comments about him also. Jerks!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)eom
vaberella
(24,634 posts)Mdterp01
(144 posts)I used to love Cornel West. When did he go bat shit?
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)Christine King Farris, sister of Martin Luther King, Jr, smiles as President Barack Obama is sworn in on her brothers bible as she watches from Ebenezer Baptist Church following the 45th Martin Luther King, Jr. Annual Commemorative Service in Atlanta, Georgia, January 21
http://theobamadiary.com/2013/01/21/inauguration-day-part-9/
Number23
(24,544 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)about to make a thread of it!
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Without Bush, more than 10,000 americans would have had a chance to live full lifetimes. Without Bush, tens of thousands of americans would have healthy bodies and limbs. Without Bush, our nation wouldn't have come within mere hours of complete ruin in the late summer of 2008. Fuck Nader and fuck every single one of the 97,000 people that voted for him in Florida. The nation would have been better off without them.
Beringia
(4,316 posts)and reading the comments, I think that MLK was an activist and Pres Obama is a politician. Activists pressure politicians.
I don't know about Cornel West being petty. But if MLK were alive, it may be he would be trying to pressure Pres Obama to do more about poverty and war, which I think is part of Cornel West's point about being offended at Pres Obama connecting himself so closely in symbol with MLK.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)That dream is closer to coming true now than it ever was and President Obama's SECOND inauguration, even after the last vestiges of racism have been thrown at him, is the symbol of that. This was done to HONOR that dream and to show that we still have work to do - as President Obama himself said in his address.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)How many times have they been arrested in defense of striking janitors.
Cornel has the right to his opinion but I guess we're all supposed to think alike.
One thing MLK might not note, but I will, is that an oath is a solemn vow. Restating it simply so you can swear on a stack of bibles seems to cheapen it. The Inauguration should have been on Sunday, as prescribed by the Constitution; not MLK's birthday -- a day when we should focus on memorializing the man and what he fought for. The fact thast we have a black president does not change that
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)term ends on the 20th of January. In this case, President Obama did indeed take his official oath of office on the 20th, but did the ceremonial one on Monday. That is tradition. President Obama could have done his official oath at any time prior to his first term expiring.
Constitutional Law is a picky and tricky subject.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)I think it gives even more credence to MLK's legacy. If the bible is the issue..in my perspective it's a piece of paper with words...it's like swearing on a flat screen manual. It's irrelevant and actually makes most arguments weak when it's pushing this inconsequential issue.
Beringia
(4,316 posts)We are still deep in wars and poverty is getting worse with loss of unions and jobs overseas.
And as for MLK's family knowing more about MLK's wishes, no one can know that for sure. I don't think MLK would have cared about Pres Obama using the bible or his family offering it, but I think he also would support Dr. West expressing his opinion.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Really, just LOL!!!! I CANNOT believe you asked that. You run along now and Google...
ETA a copy of the above post just in case he self deletes:
Beringia (291 posts)
166. What do you mean the dream is closer
We are still deep in wars and poverty is getting worse with loss of unions and jobs overseas.
And as for MLK's family knowing more about MLK's wishes, no one can know that for sure. I don't think MLK would have cared about Pres Obama using the bible or his family offering it, but I think he also would support Dr. West expressing his opinion.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I admire that. Democrats never say how they are going to increase wages, keep the poor out of jail and off the streets, properly fund education. In order to help end poverty you have to help the poor with financial programs such as Medicaid and food stamps but you also must fund education, increase wages, provide housing, and address the prision industrial complex so that those in poverty can move out of poverty. No one not even democrats truly and properly addresses the poverty issue in this country. The poorest in this country still have no voice. No one speaks for them.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)If he was so concerned about poor African Americans, he could get his ass on the street working with at risk African American youth like many people that we never hear a fucking peep from do every single day. Cornell West is a buffoon and an asshole.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Bring grocery stores to the inner cities
Stop youth from using knives guns to resolve conflict
Funded scholarships for exceptional African American students
Help build playgrounds in the inner city
Help start urban farms in inner cities so that residents can relax and grow vegetables
I could be wrong, but I have never heard of Cornell West being measurably involved with any of the causes above.
I haven't seen Cornell West do anything other than self-promote, sell books and run his mouth.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I am entitled to mine. He brings attention to issues that politicians ignore. I admire that. If you continue to insist on persisting you will go on ignore. I don't intend to get in an argument with someone that cannot allow others to have a different opinion than they do.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)1/ten-billionth of the good that Barack Obama did in an inner city setting, even when the President was a mere community organizer in south Chicago. More African American young people have been inspired by President Obama than Cornell West will inspire in ten million lifetimes.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)catbyte
(34,376 posts)now he has to be MLK too? Unfair.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)The guy is a legend in his own mind.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)Or only when he criticises President Obama?
Do criticism of Administration allies count? Michelle Rhee for example? Hillary Clinton?
What about Oliver Stone?
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)I don't always disagree with President Obama, either.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Its not. And you know it.
undeterred
(34,658 posts)MLK was made of flesh and blood, and he wasn't perfect either.
johnp3907
(3,730 posts)And he DOESN'T have the deed to MLK in his wallet.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)He's gone insane.
onenote
(42,700 posts)What gives him the right to speak for Dr. King?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I do think it was a very high honor, but I'm glad it was used. Heck, maybe MLK's Bible could be used at every Presidential oath for centuries.
ShadesOfBlue
(40 posts)with this jive-talking midget representing black intellectuals on high profile platforms. And I say that as an African American who never cared for him. I can't recall any other Ivy League professor who resorts to unhinged personal attacks nor one who resorts to making childish faces to get his point across. My theory is West is that he is all about glorifying Cornel West. As a result even his legitimate critiques regarding Obama fall on deaf ears of people who otherwise may give him the time of day.
By the way considering the King family was more than happy to have Obama use the MLK's bible and asked him to sign it as well, suggests to me that West should take up his rant with MLK's children. And good luck to him on that.
Number23
(24,544 posts)She was absolutely delighted with the president's use of her brother's bible.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)No? Are they civil rights activists? How so? What strikes have they called? What protests have they organized?
It is well known that King's family is more conservative than the man himself.
While we're at it, why don't we have Obama cloak himself in the mantle of Jesus or Ghandhi or another sainted figure?
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)they deserve your respect, sir.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)As someone said in another thread MLK was one of the genius leaders in history, but he wasn't a saint just as the founding fathers were not gods, as they seem to be revered, and the constitution isn't an inerrant document from on high.
Others have been unhappy with linking Seneca Falls, Selma and Stonewall in the same breath, but it only means that the pursuit of civil rights is an unending struggle. Maybe it won't always be thus, but it seems like a permanent part of the human condition.
And I also firmly believe that Obama has the best interests at heart for all Americans. But he himself isn't a deity who can wave his hand and alleviate all suffering in society.
Obama stands on the shoulders of giants. A bible is just a bound sheaf of papers. It's MLK Jr.'s spirit that endures.
I enjoyed the video, though. It has always been a pleasure watching Dr. West speak. He a very intelligent and influential person who I agree with on most points.
Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Being pissed that the President used King's Bible is beyond idiotic.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)He has his opinions and points, but to dress it up with this mock outrage over the first Black president using MLK's bible to take the oath of the presidency is a bit strained.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Owl
(3,641 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)it had nothing to do with him...period!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Maybe he thinks MLK belongs to him.
bigtree
(85,996 posts). . . like he personally owns the man's legacy.
Number23
(24,544 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)...WTF is dude tripping on?
Walk away
(9,494 posts)is by tearing down the President. He loves to give him a public flogging because it's the only way he can get an audience. I'm sure he would follow Dennis over to Fox if they would take him. He can always go on Tavis' show and they can bash Obama together.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)He's talking about war criminals, poverty and racism but don't let that stop you from whatever you're pretending to care about.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)You just keep on thinking that West isn't using the President to get attention for his complaints. They may be legitimate positions to take but he hurts his own cause in his obnoxious attention getting ploys.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)That's all he ever does...talk.
What does using King's Bible have to do with "talking about war criminals, poverty"?
West has become a petty man.
goclark
(30,404 posts)He is a FOOL!
West and his friend Tavis Smiley don't like President Obama all of a sudden.
Think it must have been that the President did not give them much time .
I don't blame the President --- The West/ Tavis Duo want to be Pampered.
I certainly can't speak for ALL African Americans but the ones that I know that are extremely involved in Politics have put them at the bottom of the list for those we admire.
Just my thoughts
PS/ I have not heard ONE person upset about the use of the KING Bible.
Everyone that I talked to was so PROUD that President Obama honored Dr. King.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)So many people like you are just calling West names instead of addressing war crimes, poverty and racism.
Don't you have anything real to say?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"So many people like you are just calling West names instead of addressing war crimes, poverty and racism."
...isn't addressing shit. He's just hating. If Obama says "A" he says "B"
What the hell is he doing to address poverty?
Did he expand Medicaid for the poor?
The health care law is still the biggest expansion of the safety net since Medicare
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022159929
Did he expand aid programs for low-income Americans?
If he's so damned interested in helping the poor, why isn't working with the President instead of constantly biting at his ankles?
goclark
(30,404 posts)I have been a Civil Rights Activists for all of my Adult live.
I know exactly who I am and what I support!
Cha
(297,188 posts)stating the facts about Cornel West is too much for some to take. It's too bad really that West has to bring his jealous hate into everything he has to say about the President.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)And blamed his "white" side as the cause. West isn't has progressive as some would think.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)I won't get into the issues of the new Jim Crow and poverty because people can argue in circles about how much control the President has or doesn't have over that.
I will say that I think it's hard to argue with him that Dr. King wouldn't much care for the continued war in Afghanistan and the drone program.
I will also say that Barack Obama isn't an activist as Dr. King was. He's the elected leader of the American people, and using unmanned drones to kill suspected terrorists is very much the will of the American people.
Additionally, I think that those who say that there's very good reasons for the first black President to have used Dr. King's bible for an inauguration held on Dr. King's holiday.
I think West's comments are good food for thought. Doesn't mean you have to agree with them.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)And if that someone is the one who got that Bible from Dr. King, then too damn bad. That person wanted President Obama to use it.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022249753
That's what a leader does. West can't hold a candle to King's legacy, and he damn sure has no business condemning anyone, especially President Obama, for standing on King's shoulders, something he earned the right to do long before he became President.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)BTW. LBJ actually accomplished civil rights act--not MLK. You may judge Obama, but political leaders get things done. Activists must raise issues and move the political will, but ultimately elected leaders actualize our political will.
People who become political leaders are not purists. They have to compromise. They have to be pragmatic.
Cornell and Nader and Kucinich would never be elected president. Obama did so twice.
The victories accomplished should be cherished. Presidential affirmation of gay people's fight for equal rights including pushing congress to repeal DADT. Health care for all citizens.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/01/was-hillary-dis/
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/hillary-lbj-not-mlk-passed-civil-rights-act-2#.UQDO6SfAdIE
What would MLK think of BO's policies on:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)
ProSense
(116,464 posts)-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)
He'd meet with him and discuss the issues.
Dr Martin Luther King at the White House
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022249753
He wouldn't spend every moment biting the President's ankles from a distance. He wouldn't concern himself with petty bullshit.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)substitute Vietnam with the "War on Terror"
Imagine that?
You still haven't espoused on Dr. King's likely opinion of BO's handling of:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)
ProSense
(116,464 posts)West isn't doing anything constructive. He's simply pissing in the wind.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)to West's assertions that MLK would not be supportive of BO's policies on:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I'm not trying to equate West and MLK, I'm asking for a specific counter-argument...to West's assertions that MLK would not be supportive of BO's policies on"
West has no clue how King would approach the issues, and MLK's would not resort to personal attacks on the President's character or race.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)so why would you swear on his bible when you know he would criticize your policies on:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)
Cha
(297,188 posts)attentionwhoring his way through the years. He'd go right to the source instead of backstabbing through the cameras.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)
ProSense
(116,464 posts)what they wouldn't entail is King sitting on the sidelines taking cheap potshots at the President, and harping on his race.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Barack Obama's handling of:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)and take the focus off the fact that West's rant is beyond silly.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)that's why you can't put forward a specific argument how MLK would support BO on:
-Drug War
-Afghanistan Escalation
-Lack of Prosecution of Wall Street
-Execution of Americans Overseas without Due Process
-Drone Strikes (with "Double Taps" to hit those responding to the initial blast)
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Where the hell did I call anyone a name in that response?
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Yet you've done nothing to refute his argument b/c you can't.
Cha
(297,188 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)quinnox
(20,600 posts)A person steeped in the liberal tradition, who thinks about poverty, is against war, and is basically a fire breathing progressive.
I can only imagine how different Obama's disappointing first term would have been, with a guy like this advising him. Instead, we got the compromiser and reaching out to the GOP scumbag party only to have, predictably, the hand extended slapped away time and time again, and whoever was advising Obama seems to have come from the wishy-washy third way mold.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"A person steeped in the liberal tradition, who thinks about poverty, is against war, and is basically a fire breathing progressive. "
He's green with envy.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,185 posts)spanone
(135,830 posts)struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)Deep13
(39,154 posts)...because not everything has to be an historical precis.
NOVA_Dem
(620 posts)hopemountain
(3,919 posts)but i prefer the rev. al's style.
"find the good, and praise it." - alex haley
president obama has heard dr. west and tavis smiley.
and lest we forget, the president was a community organizer in his younger days. he does care. instead of going around and talking about what needs to be done better or bringing your "brother down" ALL of the damn time, get on the ground and do some of it. it's hard. oh, yeah. it is hard. and it takes time. no one is perfect. but hey, if we all just put our energy into getting it done rather than intellectualizing & grandstanding and picking what good there is into smithereens and gnawing at it from every angle... well, then, it 's just going to take that much longer for the rest of us to get it done.
i'm sure dr. west remembers the old saying from the 70's - "giving the dog a bone".