General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am very surprised at the conservative prudishness on DU these days.
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by SYFROYH (a host of the General Discussion forum).
People are flipping out about NUDE PICS ON THE INTERNETS!
Just grow up, please.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)To understand why he is posting this, I think. There is a backstory here that prompted this.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)why would this be an OP to GD, if it is based upon a Meta Forum Discussion, would it not be more appropriate there as opposed to this forum, where it raises the obvious "Huh", factor?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)and humiliate them and put out their personal info on the net, along with the pictures.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Imho, that is ENTIRELY different from "People are flipping out about NUDE PICS ON THE INTERNETS!". holy shit. My brain hurts.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)by naked women.
that is not the issue. and he keeps pushing the prudish. he ignores against will. he ignore revenge site is to ridicule and humiliate the women. he ignores it allows stalkers to know where they live.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)People are flipping out over nude pics posted by revenge seeking ex-boyfriends and without the consent of the subjects.
Ian Iam
(386 posts)The blokes who run such sites and those who post on them have no character whatsoever.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)Welcome to DU.
FarPoint
(14,664 posts)I'll bring popcorn.
Warpy
(114,528 posts)a slut-shaming double standard that's alive and well in this country that has cost women their careers over nude shots on the internet.
Develop as much intolerance for slut shaming as people did for the n-word and nude photos posted of unconsenting women will be far less of a problem.
Revenge porn sites can still expect to be sued over that 'consent' thing.
banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)there is no "shame" in nudity!
Warpy
(114,528 posts)If you want to go around in a haze and pretend the world is a perfect place, do so. Just remember the rest of us live in the real one.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)it is a perverse sexual harassment. and none of us should have to "just get used to it" and normalize that behavior.
Warpy
(114,528 posts)to some of our fellow posters at DU.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)damn well what a creep it makes them.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)but posting pics without consent on the net, where someone's parents or kids could find them, is bullshit. Even you are bright enough to know this.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)but ask any woman who has been fired over something like this, or has been labeled a whore because this happened, if there are not people out there who DO see shame in it. Until the day comes that we can all walk the streets naked, you know that there is an issue with this in society at large.
Get some sensitivity.
EvilAL
(1,437 posts)being fucking posted by assholes without the consent of the person. What the fuck is wrong with you? Are you really going to push this fucking issue over and over.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)this poster can get a good ole giggle from it.
Autumn
(48,887 posts)it's NOT conservative prudishness. It's fucking wrong. No growing up involved. It's fucking wrong.
Response to Autumn (Reply #7)
Post removed
Autumn
(48,887 posts)I'm not buying what you are selling. If the ex boyfriend or husbands are publishing those pics on that site, without the consent of the women the only ones who should be shamed are the so called men doing it. It's a matter of the lack of CONSENT by the women..
Edited to add. what the hell does being gay have to do with it?????????
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)It's sexual harassment, it's a vile breach of trust and it's wrong.
Women do not have to sit down and shut up and take it, and we won't.
JI7
(93,402 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Come on, big boy. Let's see it.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)a PRUDE!
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)after how many posts of yours dismissing how a woman may feel, i gotta figure you are one ot exploit women and need to validate and justify your own behavior.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)Just a technicality. I remember.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Grow up, man! Show us what a man you are!
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)It's like, I dunno, you're a prude or something.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)I do hope you take the chance to start an OP with a picture of you in the altogether. It's time we all get shocked out of our humdrum complacency and see the TRUE meaning of liberalism, as illustrated by banned from Kos' NAKED ASS!
Squinch
(59,062 posts)win Academy Awards.
It is also true that many of our best athletes voluntarily get the crap beaten out of themselves for money. So I guess, by your logic, it would be OK with you if someone beat the crap out of you?
(By the way, you were saying it was OK for a man to post a naked photo of his ex-girlfriend online against her will. People are not flipping out about NUDE PICS, they are flipping out about nude photos being used against the will of the subject of the photos. If you don't understand the difference, you really need to ask your mom to have the talk with you about respecting others.)
Response to banned from Kos (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)leftstreet
(39,759 posts)Wassamatter? Your boss didn't get reelected?
2on2u
(1,843 posts)
stultusporcos
(327 posts)aikoaiko
(34,213 posts)This OP meets the definition of "whining about DU" which is explicitly prohibited in the GD SOP.
It would do fine in meta, however.