Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

srican69

(1,426 posts)
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:12 PM Jan 2013

Reason people buy AR-15 type guns is similar to the reason why people buy Huge SUVs...



Its been shown that SUV's are LESS safe compared to cars. When you include the probability of rollovers - its more likely that you will be hurt in one rather than in a humble car. But people continued to buy them, despite evidence to the contrary to the most cited reason viz.. " I want to feel safer" ...(a trend that continued until they got slammed by high oil prices).

A psychologist ( I forget his name) did a study ( that included the subjects being interviewed in partial state of sleep) and came to the conclusion that the reason people bought the vehicles was that the increased ground clearance gave them a feeling of superiority on the roads .. and that subconscious emotion was the main driver of the decision, more than any rational reason they gave when fully on guard.

My guess is that having a gun appeals to some reptilian primal instinct that is beyond all the prefrontal cortex reasoning that you can come up with .

I think we need to factor this while having a conversation with those gun totting reptiles ...
227 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reason people buy AR-15 type guns is similar to the reason why people buy Huge SUVs... (Original Post) srican69 Jan 2013 OP
Husbands buy huge SUV's for their wives and kids because big means more protection DainBramaged Jan 2013 #1
There is a peer reviewed study on this .. I am not giving my 'opinion' srican69 Jan 2013 #2
Fail DainBramaged Jan 2013 #3
if you say so. srican69 Jan 2013 #4
I remember this study of Hummer drivers... KansDem Jan 2013 #81
Some of us need MichaelHarris Jan 2013 #176
That is why I had one back when. HubertHeaver Jan 2013 #179
That would not explain SUVs in Southern California. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #191
I don't know them MichaelHarris Jan 2013 #192
In Michigan, during a snowstorm, the easiest place to find an SUV FrodosPet Jan 2013 #227
can't argue with logic like that.. frylock Jan 2013 #20
What? You don't find "Fail!" to be a compelling argument? Squinch Jan 2013 #80
Fail DainBramaged Jan 2013 #99
Doorknob Squinch Jan 2013 #103
Ignored DainBramaged Jan 2013 #104
Yay! Squinch Jan 2013 #114
You should get a gold star sharp_stick Jan 2013 #170
Thank you ! Squinch Jan 2013 #171
Only one prize is suitable: muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #199
. Squinch Jan 2013 #221
You win Major Nikon Jan 2013 #181
BWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA we can do it Jan 2013 #122
Thanks! Squinch Jan 2013 #123
+1000 we can do it Jan 2013 #85
Link? diphthong Jan 2013 #10
I cant find the peer reviewed article but here is the interview on CBS 60 minutes srican69 Jan 2013 #23
Go back to DU v.2 and search under my old name "Cryingshame". I posted this info numerous times. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #52
Starting to search old info: KittyWampus Jan 2013 #54
Same psychology as the bullet bumpers on the '55 Cad - "don't mess with me" message to others. leveymg Jan 2013 #62
Please provide enough information so I can hunt down that study. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbq6lUgG8gA srican69 Jan 2013 #30
Is the study about cars "peer-reviewed," or your opinion about AR-15s and reptiles? Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #34
A search of Psychlit shows no peer-reviewed articles for Clotaire Rapaille. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #39
"peer reviewed" is the most absurdly overused DU phrase. Rapaille makes a living on marketing psych KittyWampus Jan 2013 #56
"four-wheel-drive behemoth carries more carrots than climbing gear" Americans? "carrots"? Yavin4 Jan 2013 #77
Big macs? we can do it Jan 2013 #136
Much better n/t Yavin4 Jan 2013 #140
the appeal of "peer reviewed" is the peers doing the reviewing... Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2013 #108
"Freud Explorer"!! Great pun. nt tblue37 Jan 2013 #128
Almost as good as a Freud Probe? we can do it Jan 2013 #167
Sounds like he's following in the footsteps of Edward Bernays deutsey Jan 2013 #197
Thanks for the info. Sounded pretty cantilevered. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #64
One of the men who was involved in the marketing wrote about this. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #53
Marketing what, SUVs or AR 15s? And what is the import of this? Thanks. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #66
Will you please explain the failure in logic? ZombieHorde Jan 2013 #6
It depends on who you ask... Taverner Jan 2013 #12
They sure carry a shitload more comfortably DainBramaged Jan 2013 #21
might be your logic that's failing here? 0rganism Jan 2013 #24
Meh DainBramaged Jan 2013 #63
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. baldguy Jan 2013 #180
Meh, another DU grammar smith DainBramaged Jan 2013 #193
I too used to often dismiss others when they aptly illustrate me as an idiot. LanternWaste Jan 2013 #220
You again miss the point DainBramaged Jan 2013 #222
I drove station wagons which hold a shitload VERY comfortably. Without endangering other drivers. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #57
How many station wagons are there now that don't cost a forutne you can afford? DainBramaged Jan 2013 #65
Do they even make station wagons anymore? nick of time Jan 2013 #68
They ain't like what you think they are DainBramaged Jan 2013 #97
Auto makers stopped making station wagons in favor of SUVs baldguy Jan 2013 #195
Thank you for the info. nt. nick of time Jan 2013 #210
CAFE standards and the chicken tax discourage the production of large station wagons JVS Jan 2013 #208
Thanks for the info. nt. nick of time Jan 2013 #209
Thanks so very much for this information. It explains so much. KittyWampus Jan 2013 #226
Wow, a 1 second google search finds quite a few. But don't let facts get in the way of your fail. we can do it Jan 2013 #92
(sigh) $26,000 to $36 000, that's afforadable you bet DainBramaged Jan 2013 #94
Compared to big SUVs? Yes, they are. Is your google broke? $28,995 - $116,925 we can do it Jan 2013 #105
We own an SUV too, Worried senior Jan 2013 #59
Ever heard of a trailer? tabasco Jan 2013 #95
You folks ain't changing America's driving or buying habits for the next 50 years DainBramaged Jan 2013 #98
Spoken like someone with their head truly in the sand about climate change muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #200
This message was self-deleted by its author DainBramaged Jan 2013 #204
If you don't think DU makes a difference, and think we shouldn't live other people's lives muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #216
This message was self-deleted by its author DainBramaged Jan 2013 #217
Go bother someone else DainBramaged Jan 2013 #218
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) says cars are safer (2013) we can do it Jan 2013 #126
Thanks! Taverner Jan 2013 #157
No problem, glad to help! I'm big on safety myself. we can do it Jan 2013 #158
Her FACTS are exactly correct. SUV's were intentionally marketed this way. INTENTIONALLY. I've poste KittyWampus Jan 2013 #50
Links please DainBramaged Jan 2013 #70
Generalize much? guardian Jan 2013 #82
Husbands buy big SUVs because of their small penises. Not because they are safe. we can do it Jan 2013 #69
And people make comments like that who have small brains DainBramaged Jan 2013 #71
Oh now I'm going to have to call the waaaambulance. It's big I'll be safe. we can do it Jan 2013 #72
+1000. nt. nick of time Jan 2013 #73
Fail. zappaman Jan 2013 #172
The desire of the SUV driver is to be big and strong - and intimidating. we can do it Jan 2013 #87
Did you even bother to read what you've posted? baldguy Jan 2013 #111
These are exactly the kind of people who need their "toys" taken away. we can do it Jan 2013 #120
Another Union basher.... DainBramaged Jan 2013 #148
How is any of this even remotely union bashing? we can do it Jan 2013 #152
Non sequiturs all around. baldguy Jan 2013 #173
I know laundry_queen Jan 2013 #187
Same here, but pretty equal between sexes, they are rarely dirty, let alone muddy. we can do it Jan 2013 #196
accusations of union bashing are the last refuge of the left wing scoundrel muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #201
A friend PasadenaTrudy Jan 2013 #5
I think you friend cculd be compensating too .. srican69 Jan 2013 #7
Possibly.. PasadenaTrudy Jan 2013 #11
And there it is, nick of time Jan 2013 #13
First SUVs, then AR-15s (something "peer-reviewed?"), then [bada-BOOM] com-pen-sa-ting! nt Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #36
It was so predictable. nt, nick of time Jan 2013 #37
When controllers speak of "predictability," that means they are about to relieve their load. nt Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #42
Hit a nerve, huh? Zoeisright Jan 2013 #188
Nope, not at all. nick of time Jan 2013 #206
I'm not that short dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #14
That pretty much makes the OP's point we can do it Jan 2013 #117
We'd all be able to see better if their over-sized asses would get out of the way. we can do it Jan 2013 #175
Kind of a strange disconnect in your OP Union Scribe Jan 2013 #8
Subconscious emotion is a powerful thing The2ndWheel Jan 2013 #15
Given the compensating, reptilian peer-reviews, psychology should meld with shamanism. nt Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #38
We need to understand them only for the purpose of devising more personal insults. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jan 2013 #74
I have an SUV because it's perfectly suited for farm work nick of time Jan 2013 #9
I thought pickup trucks were perfectly suited for farm work? Taverner Jan 2013 #16
The pick ups are for the my 3 employees. nick of time Jan 2013 #18
Ahhh gotchya Taverner Jan 2013 #19
The Expedition has maybe 8 inches of ground clearance Mosby Jan 2013 #44
The clearance on most SUVs is a myth ... kwassa Jan 2013 #49
Nothin' says I'm the boss like leather seats and 10 mpg and seating for 12 we can do it Jan 2013 #124
What about a family of 12? What are they supposed to do, walk? darkangel218 Jan 2013 #130
Uphill both ways in a blizzard with their AR197.6s or what evers? we can do it Jan 2013 #135
Bye bye. nt darkangel218 Jan 2013 #138
Does anyone know what the Duggarmobile looks like? JVS Jan 2013 #212
That's right. nick of time Jan 2013 #144
HA! we can do it Jan 2013 #145
They are, but the small ones were replaced by SUV which are a heck nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #91
Yeah - Chevy Luvs weren't that stable... Taverner Jan 2013 #109
you may have a perfectly valid reason to buy an SUV and an AR-15 sir .. srican69 Jan 2013 #25
That's fair enough. nick of time Jan 2013 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author we can do it Jan 2013 #139
Fixed it. nick of time Jan 2013 #146
no problem I will delete the other one we can do it Jan 2013 #147
True...we have to drown out the voices of the extremes from both sides...n/t Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #55
We use a pick up for farm work. How does shoveling manure into your SUV work? KittyWampus Jan 2013 #58
I also have 2 pick ups that my employees use for that kind of hauling. nick of time Jan 2013 #61
I have an SUV cuz it is hard to get through 6+" of snow in the mountains in a car Lesmoderesstupides Jan 2013 #17
The Scandanavian's seem to do alright with Volvo's and Saab's GoneOffShore Jan 2013 #83
You are making WAY too much sense for this conversation. we can do it Jan 2013 #90
This thread is reading more like a SNL skit!!! All we need now are the visuals!!! LOL RKP5637 Jan 2013 #112
And a song........ we can do it Jan 2013 #119
Socialists who pay to plow the roads. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #127
My SUV gets better mileage than an XC90 so you want me to get a vehicle that uses more gas? Lesmoderesstupides Jan 2013 #194
My 2000 Saab 9-3 gets 22 in town 35 highway. GoneOffShore Jan 2013 #202
So you stab your working brothers and sisters in the back, and buy a non US union made car Lesmoderesstupides Jan 2013 #203
Saab was owned by GM at the time. GoneOffShore Jan 2013 #214
I know me first, I got it the first time Lesmoderesstupides Jan 2013 #215
Are you always this charming? GoneOffShore Jan 2013 #223
Just very direct, sorry if you don't approve Lesmoderesstupides Jan 2013 #224
I'm sure you are. GoneOffShore Jan 2013 #225
Ernesto Jan 2013 #22
here ya go! Ernesto Jan 2013 #26
He, he..., but don't forget that in places like cupcake land that's bragging rights for women too. patrice Jan 2013 #31
Or it's what they learned on One_Life_To_Give Jan 2013 #29
Don't have a SUV, but have an extended cab pickup - lynne Jan 2013 #32
fortune 500 companies flock to him to pay millions of dollars .. you still think he needs to get out srican69 Jan 2013 #33
You equate money to common sense? lynne Jan 2013 #35
I think they called it The Hidden Persuaders back in da 50s. Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #40
My 2WD Ford F250 extendo cab diesel gets 30 MPG on the highway. Ernesto Jan 2013 #45
not just AR15 Locrian Jan 2013 #41
That is the truth laundry_queen Jan 2013 #189
SUVs mean that you'll survive a crash with a smaller vehicle, it's a kind of bullying flamingdem Jan 2013 #43
Trucks are useful. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #46
Guess you didn't hear: SUV drivers are less likely to die in a crash. REP Jan 2013 #47
No they are not we can do it Jan 2013 #75
Go play with your itty bitty imporred car DainBramaged Jan 2013 #101
What is imporred? we can do it Jan 2013 #132
Like the article says, Electronic Stability Control Major Nikon Jan 2013 #182
Pit bull owners as well michigandem58 Jan 2013 #48
Itty bitty dicks? NV Whino Jan 2013 #51
I guess that could be since I mostly see women driving SUVs... NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #60
Yeah, but do they have big guns in the rear window? NV Whino Jan 2013 #78
I can't tell. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #79
! NV Whino Jan 2013 #134
touche raidert05 Jan 2013 #162
Ever drive by a fast food joint? The drive thru's full of dudes in SUVs most of the time. we can do it Jan 2013 #159
No. I don't drive by them much NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #160
Funny, they have the opposite effect on me, I am flung out of orbit unless sucked into a milkshake.. we can do it Jan 2013 #161
It NEVER fails, people have a personal bone to pick with SUV's so DU is the bashing grounds DainBramaged Jan 2013 #67
small penises. Kip Humphrey Jan 2013 #76
Thoughtless, shallow pseudo mass mind-reading post is thoughtless and shallow slackmaster Jan 2013 #84
Good points. Rock on. n/t guardian Jan 2013 #86
Probably from the same place the pencil went! whistler162 Jan 2013 #125
substitute for a penis? lastlib Jan 2013 #88
I think like a dozen people have beaten you to that canard. Union Scribe Jan 2013 #198
Ok, explain those of us who need the ground clearance nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #89
You are talking to people who think they are smarter than the rest of us DainBramaged Jan 2013 #93
Well, we bought a 2004 Jeep nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #107
Not that many people buy them quaker bill Jan 2013 #96
They're popular because they're small, light, and low-powered Recursion Jan 2013 #116
loose vaginas and small tits The Straight Story Jan 2013 #100
Well said DainBramaged Jan 2013 #102
LOL - add the pics! RKP5637 Jan 2013 #113
ROFL!! darkangel218 Jan 2013 #118
You spelled it correctly, try again. we can do it Jan 2013 #141
His name is Dr. Clotaire Rapaille Sen. Walter Sobchak Jan 2013 #106
So im a "gun totting reptile because i drive an SUV?? darkangel218 Jan 2013 #110
Wow, I learn something new on DU everyday. justanidea Jan 2013 #115
The OP does say "Huge SUVs" - I don't think Wranglers are huge. we can do it Jan 2013 #165
Is that you, mayor Bloomberg?? darkangel218 Jan 2013 #121
It seems they both have the "I am more important than everyone else" attitude. we can do it Jan 2013 #129
And for those of you who equate small penises with driving SUV's DainBramaged Jan 2013 #131
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Jan 2013 #133
To be fair, some of us just have no place to go. bluedigger Jan 2013 #137
Awesome picture. nick of time Jan 2013 #151
In the mountains between Ouray and Telluride, Colorado. bluedigger Jan 2013 #153
Thanks. nick of time Jan 2013 #154
Okay, one more. bluedigger Jan 2013 #155
Whole different perspective. nick of time Jan 2013 #156
So, like SUVs, AR15s are LESS safe than other models, despite accounting for <3% of gun homicide? nt OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #142
I have a huge SUV...no husband,kids or dogs.. HipChick Jan 2013 #143
I had a huge SUV . . . and a Golden Retriever, no kids, no husband. In_The_Wind Jan 2013 #205
Chomp! dawg Jan 2013 #211
So women driving SUv's are reptiles with itty bitty penises? DainBramaged Jan 2013 #149
Wo men recepticles of tiny penises beware!!!1111!!! I;m series1 we can do it Jan 2013 #174
People also bought them as an alternative to a minivan. krispos42 Jan 2013 #150
LOL Remmah2 Jan 2013 #163
So they don't get stuck in the snow? crazyjoe Jan 2013 #164
People who are obsessed with the correlation of penis size and personal possessions sylvi Jan 2013 #166
...or small minds Major Nikon Jan 2013 #183
I'm going to call it RODWIN'S LAW... cherokeeprogressive Jan 2013 #185
"Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people." JVS Jan 2013 #213
Yeah, that's pretty obvious tabasco Jan 2013 #168
it isn't that deep for me. Algebra Palin Jan 2013 #169
Oh, Man, you guys crack me up Adam-Bomb Jan 2013 #177
Welcome to DU. Hope you've got more going than gats 'n guzzlers... VOX Jan 2013 #184
Your message is lost in the weeds Xipe Totec Jan 2013 #178
Status symbol. Shows their income level. freshwest Jan 2013 #186
These comparisons work to a very limited extent fujiyama Jan 2013 #190
the reason is.....GROUPTHINK!!! yay narrow-minded insulting fools who can't read! farminator3000 Jan 2013 #207
My guess is that like other commodities, Madison Avenue has done a bang-up job LanternWaste Jan 2013 #219

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
1. Husbands buy huge SUV's for their wives and kids because big means more protection
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:14 PM
Jan 2013

I drove behind a woman in a Suburban a couple of weeks ago who could barely see over the sterring wheel. She had kids and a dog with her.


Your logic is fail

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
81. I remember this study of Hummer drivers...
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:18 PM
Jan 2013
Hummer Owners Claim Moral High Ground To Excuse Overconsumption, Study Finds

Sep. 25, 2009 — Hummer drivers believe they are defending America's frontier lifestyle against anti-American critics, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

"As we studied American Hummer owners and their ideological beliefs, we found that they consider Hummer driving a highly moral consumption choice," write the authors. "For Hummer owners it is possible to claim the moral high ground."

The authors explain that Hummer owners employ the ideology of American foundational myths, such as the "rugged individual," and the "boundless frontier" to construct themselves as moral protagonists. They often believe they represent a bastion again anti-American discourses evoked by their critics.

"Our analysis of the underlying American identity discourses revealed that being under siege by (moral) critics is an historically established feature of being an American," write the authors. "The moralistic critique of their consumption choices readily inspired Hummer owners to adopt the role of the moral protagonist who defends American national ideals."


--more--
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090921162156.htm

I don't know about monster SUVs and pickups, but Hummer drivers considered themselves to be "rugged individuals."

MichaelHarris

(10,017 posts)
176. Some of us need
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 11:23 PM
Jan 2013

SUVs and trucks to get out of the snow and to places like jobs and to buy groceries.

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
179. That is why I had one back when.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:09 AM
Jan 2013

I had a Firebird and a full-sized Blazer. Snowdrifts blocked the Firebird in the garage on New Year's Eve. I wasn't able to get it out until late March.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
191. That would not explain SUVs in Southern California.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:59 AM
Jan 2013

We don't have snow. Most of the SUV drivers in Southern California just want to take up a lot of room and feel big.

That is also true of hobby truck drivers, people who live in the city and drive trucks when they don't need them for work or even sport.

There is somebody near us who has a gangsta' truck. It has giant wheels and the doors are raised up at least four feet above the ground. We walked past today and my husband asked, "How do they get in their?" We think they must use some sort of step-ladder.

When you have people who park their SUVs in the compact car spaces at Trader Joe's and drive trucks that can be entered only with a ladder, you know you are dealing with people who do not think like most of us do. Same with people who just have to have extremely powerful guns. There is something going on in the psyche that makes them, shall we say, "exceptional" in some way.

What can you do with those super-powerful rifles other than shoot them on a range somewhere? Is it really such a thrill? I suppose it makes a lot of noise. And what do those things do to your eardrums even if you have special protection for your ears?

I just think a lot of people are a little nutty.

MichaelHarris

(10,017 posts)
192. I don't know them
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:02 AM
Jan 2013

therefore I won't judge or determine their needs, maybe they have a cabin, family in the mountains, dunno, not my place to judge their needs.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
227. In Michigan, during a snowstorm, the easiest place to find an SUV
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 08:16 PM
Jan 2013

Is in the median or the ditch.

Many of the drivers have no clue that, while 4WD helps get you through the snow, on ice all you have are 4 spinning wheels.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
80. What? You don't find "Fail!" to be a compelling argument?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:17 PM
Jan 2013

I am always surprised that people think they've said anything when they say, "Fail!"

I think, when I disagree with someone, I'm going to start saying, "Doorknob!" Because, really, who could argue with that?

srican69

(1,426 posts)
23. I cant find the peer reviewed article but here is the interview on CBS 60 minutes
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:46 PM
Jan 2013



Clotaire Rapaille - SUVs and the Reptilian Brain (60 Minutes)
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
54. Starting to search old info:
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:14 PM
Jan 2013

3. Intimidation: This is related to safety, because how we drive is at least as important as what we drive. When one feels immune to risk, one tends to act less safely.
You may have seen the recent “60 Minutes” story about SUVs, which quoted a psychologist and automobile-industry consultant about why people buy SUVs. He said that it’s not about safety or roominess or any of the other reasons people cite. And of course a very small minority of SUV owners actually take their vehicles off-road. Most of them don’t have the undercarriage clearance to do so anyway.
The psychologist said the real reason is that people want to project a tough and intimidating image when they drive down the street. Ads for SUVs certainly tap into this motivation. General Motors in particular has been aggressive in marketing its Cadillac Escalade, in commercials in which trains stop at railroad crossings to let the Escalade pass, and other cars scurry away when the Escalade shows up.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
62. Same psychology as the bullet bumpers on the '55 Cad - "don't mess with me" message to others.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:32 PM
Jan 2013

Like the teeth on a warthog:



Some things don't change: particularly, GM and the psychology of a certain segment of American consumers - the insecure rich.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
39. A search of Psychlit shows no peer-reviewed articles for Clotaire Rapaille.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:13 PM
Jan 2013

The closest is J.P. Rapaille, a Belgian psychologist who has published a couple of French-language studies on aptitude & intelligence testing.

Clotaire Rapaille has written an article in Forbes & consults to marketing departments, but is actually a psychiatrist and does not publish in peer-reviewed journals.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
56. "peer reviewed" is the most absurdly overused DU phrase. Rapaille makes a living on marketing psych
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:18 PM
Jan 2013
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-562824.html

Dr. Clotaire Rapaille, a psychologist, makes a living explaining that need to major corporations like the Detroit "Big Three" and European auto-makers.

"The notion of need is very, very interesting. Because what do we really need, you see? I need food, I need water. I need shelter," says Rapaille. "And you know that, but then there are other needs, needs of identity. Needs of communication. Needs of being loved, being respected."

And the need for cars.

"Absolutely. Cars are very key," adds Rapaille. "They are an expression of myself. You know, this is maybe the best way for Americans to express themselves."

That's why ads show SUVs bouncing up mountains and fording streams, even though the automakers know only about five percent of owners ever go off-road. The reality is that the two-ton, four-wheel-drive behemoth carries more carrots than climbing gear, and it's just the ticket for lugging that ton of household bills.

Rapaille no longer sees patients. He doesn't need to, because he's paid well to supply his insights to corporate America - and lives in baronial splendor outside of New York City.

Apart from Ford, GM and Chrysler, he's advised companies like Kelloggs, Kraft, and Proctor & Gamble. They pay him to get inside the deepest recesses of our brains. In fact, he's known as the "car shrink" in Detroit.

"Why do you buy a car that doesn't even make 10 miles per gallon, doesn't fit into your garage? Do you really need that? And you don't need that intellectually," he says. "But at the reptilian level, what I call the reptilian level, the reptilian brain, the deepest part of you, the gut level if you want, you feel like you need that."
If Rapaille were an SUV, he'd be a Freud Explorer. He says people are completely unaware of the subconscious, reptilian reasons why they're drawn to SUVs.

Yavin4

(35,438 posts)
77. "four-wheel-drive behemoth carries more carrots than climbing gear" Americans? "carrots"?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:11 PM
Jan 2013

I highly doubt that.

 

Sen. Walter Sobchak

(8,692 posts)
108. the appeal of "peer reviewed" is the peers doing the reviewing...
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jan 2013

tend to swing much closer to some of DU's more eccentric elements than the mainstream.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
21. They sure carry a shitload more comfortably
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:36 PM
Jan 2013

logic still fails. I owned SUV's for years, don't own a gun....

0rganism

(23,952 posts)
24. might be your logic that's failing here?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:47 PM
Jan 2013

the OP isn't claiming that SUV owners are necessarily gun owners or vice-versa, but rather that similar motivations underlie the purchase of a large SUV and an AR-15 (specifically!) There are better cars for road safety, and there are generally better firearms for practical purposes such as hunting, target practice, or even self defense -- let alone the real possibility that people are likely safer without a gun at all.

I read the OP as saying that both the large SUV and the AR-15 are pareto-suboptimal, but processed through a pre-rational framework that doesn't take practicality or effectiveness into account.

Your denials do nothing, by themselves, to refute the OP. Perhaps they, too, stem from pre-rational attachments?

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
220. I too used to often dismiss others when they aptly illustrate me as an idiot.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:47 PM
Jan 2013

I too used to often dismiss others when they aptly illustrated me as an idiot.

I got better the more I listened to others...

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
222. You again miss the point
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 05:46 PM
Jan 2013

I just don't give a shit.I've spent my life listening to idiots who think they are better than me, now I just say


Meh


You insult yourself calling me an idiot.


Merry Christmas


Goodbye. Go bother someone else.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
97. They ain't like what you think they are
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:00 PM
Jan 2013

little bitty wagons from 26-36K


You got people here throwing stones at SUV's and the best part, they ain't fucking changing America's driving habits from he DU





Fools


Keep crying oh whoa is America the SUV is ruining us.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
195. Auto makers stopped making station wagons in favor of SUVs
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 09:03 AM
Jan 2013

because the profit margin on SUVs is much larger, and because of industry-imposed regulatory oddities SUVs are classed as trucks rather than passenger vehicles they don't have to meet the same safety or mileage standards as normal cars. SUVs are an invention of the sales & marketing divisions of the auto makers. To pull it off they had to get rid of the station wagons and vans, and convince ordinary people to buy this new product that they've never seen or heard of instead. Their success is proof against anyone who believes advertising doesn't work.

JVS

(61,935 posts)
208. CAFE standards and the chicken tax discourage the production of large station wagons
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:31 PM
Jan 2013

The crux of the issue is Passenger Car vs. Light Truck (and from a regulatory perspective an SUV or a Minivan is a light truck).

Light trucks have less strict CAFE requirements. So if you're making a car to haul a family of 5 and their gear (traditionally the province of the large family sedan or wagon) you have the choice of making a big wagon which could bump your passenger car fleet above CAFE standards or an SUV or minivan which fits comfortably under the standards for light trucks.

The chicken tax also provides incentive because foreign competitors are taxed a 25% tariff in the light truck segment. So while choosing whether to make a wagon or SUV you can decide if you want to go toe to toe with the Japanese or benefit from the tariff.

This is why the only station wagons you tend to see anymore are usually foreign and usually small (big exceptions being some European wagons by luxury marques.)

we can do it

(12,184 posts)
92. Wow, a 1 second google search finds quite a few. But don't let facts get in the way of your fail.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:53 PM
Jan 2013

Car Rankings: Affordable Wagons

View the best wagons, covering station wagons and sports wagons generally priced below $30,000. Then compare wagon reviews, specs and features.

http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/rankings/Affordable-Wagons/

Worried senior

(1,328 posts)
59. We own an SUV too,
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:22 PM
Jan 2013

got it to pull our camper and when we need a bigger vehicle when we need something to carry larger items.

We also have a small car that is driven more often. My husband has 2 artificial hips and spinal stenosis, the SUV is much more comfortable for him than the small car is so there are times we chose to drive the suburban.

We don't have guns, have one old shotgun that belonged to my father, have no ammunition for it and it's hidden away.

The only thing that makes me feel guilty driving the SUV is the amt of gas it takes to fill it but for comfort it can't be beat.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
95. Ever heard of a trailer?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:57 PM
Jan 2013

I pull one with a 4-banger. 1200-pound capacity.

Yeah, I know - that's not going to work when you need to haul a load of cut 24-inch oak logs, like you do all the time.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
98. You folks ain't changing America's driving or buying habits for the next 50 years
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:01 PM
Jan 2013

We get the last laugh.


Have a nice evening.


Have fun with your logs

muriel_volestrangler

(101,315 posts)
200. Spoken like someone with their head truly in the sand about climate change
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 10:11 AM
Jan 2013

And you've just proved the OP's point. What you're saying is just like a gun enthusiast saying:

"You folks ain't changing America's shooting or hunting habits for the next 50 years

We get the last laugh.


Have a nice evening.


Have fun with your burglars"

Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #200)

muriel_volestrangler

(101,315 posts)
216. If you don't think DU makes a difference, and think we shouldn't live other people's lives
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:57 PM
Jan 2013

then you should stop posting in other people's threads with "fail". You are interfering in other people's conversations and lives. You are disruptive.

Response to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #216)

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
218. Go bother someone else
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jan 2013

Fuck it


I don't answer to you. Put me on ignore, I just did to you. Don't answer my PM you aren't worth the effort.


Have a nice life

we can do it

(12,184 posts)
126. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) says cars are safer (2013)
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:28 PM
Jan 2013

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is awarding its new Top Safety Pick+ accolade to 13 cars. All earned good or acceptable ratings in the new IIHS small overlap test as well as top marks in other IIHS evaluations.

Winners include the Acura TL; Dodge Avenger and its twin, the Chrysler 200 4-door; Ford Fusion; Honda Accord 2-door; Honda Accord 4-door; Kia Optima; Nissan Altima 4-door; Subaru Legacy and its twin, the Subaru Outback; Suzuki Kizashi; Volkswagen Passat and Volvo S60. The Acura TL and Volvo S60 are midsize luxury cars. The other models are midsize, moderately priced cars.

http://www.bodyshopbusiness.com/issue/article.aspx?contentid=108505&categoryId=2440

http://www.iihs.org/ratings/tsp_current.aspx

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
50. Her FACTS are exactly correct. SUV's were intentionally marketed this way. INTENTIONALLY. I've poste
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:07 PM
Jan 2013

I've posted the info on this numerous times.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
70. Links please
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:45 PM
Jan 2013

They weren't marketed like trucks, they were marketed as vehicles to give the family more personal freedom, but NO ONE went off roading or camping, but America LOVES THEM, especially HERE IN THE NORTHEAST and other snow climates where they provide SAFETY because of 4 wheel drive.



Be well

 

guardian

(2,282 posts)
82. Generalize much?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:19 PM
Jan 2013
"but NO ONE went off roading or camping"


Not true. I have the scratches and dents on my SUV to prove you wrong. I also have the interior rash from hauling stoves, lumber, bricks and other large or heavy items that would not fit in your Prius.

we can do it

(12,184 posts)
87. The desire of the SUV driver is to be big and strong - and intimidating.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:41 PM
Jan 2013

The desire of the SUV driver is to be big and strong - and intimidating. SUV drivers want to sit up high and literally "look down" on other drivers. And they want to drive as recklessly as the drivers in the off-road ads. Most are adult males - who insist on continuing to be teenage boys.

The SUV simply does not fulfill a valid need for the overwhelming majority of us. Consider, for example, the Hummer. Does anyone actually have a valid NEED that is fulfilled by the Hummer?

Do the auto companies know that the SUV is a stupid, gas-guzzling irresponsible vehicle? Of course they do; and they love it. The SUV provides the largest profit of any vehicle sold by auto companies. .................






not my words........from car talk "click and clack" Tom Magliozzi
http://www.cartalk.com/content/rant-and-rave-163

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
111. Did you even bother to read what you've posted?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jan 2013

The woman you saw "could barely see over the sterring wheel", and was being distracted by kids & a dog. And this driver is more "protected" than others? Sounds more like an accident waiting to happen.

Much like people who seek to own high-powered assault weapons. The desire to own one is prima facie evidence that such a person should not have one.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
187. I know
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:19 AM
Jan 2013

I have no idea how that poster got from point A 'SUVs are less safe but because of marketing people think they are MORE safe so they buy them' to 'we want non-union vehicles and we want to destroy the American auto industry!!!'

It's quite the leap, to say the least. Some of the biggest SUVs in my town with tiny blonde women in them are Toyota and Nissan.

we can do it

(12,184 posts)
196. Same here, but pretty equal between sexes, they are rarely dirty, let alone muddy.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 09:20 AM
Jan 2013

One person plodding along 8-10 mpg, who takes 5 minutes to maneuver into a parking space at olive garden.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,315 posts)
201. accusations of union bashing are the last refuge of the left wing scoundrel
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 10:15 AM
Jan 2013

While a right winger who's been beaten in argument will whine "why do you hate your country?", no matter how irrelevant it is, a left winger will say "why do you hate unions?".

PasadenaTrudy

(3,998 posts)
5. A friend
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:17 PM
Jan 2013

of mine bought a big ol' Land Rover Discovery because he's short ( 5'5&quot and he says he can see better

srican69

(1,426 posts)
7. I think you friend cculd be compensating too ..
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:19 PM
Jan 2013

must be tired of people looking down on him ..and he gets his revenge behind the wheels of an SUV ...


remember you have to discount whatever they say ....

PasadenaTrudy

(3,998 posts)
11. Possibly..
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:23 PM
Jan 2013

Doesn't fit with his personality though...I think he's a bit paranoid too. Feels more in control sitting higher up. I like being down low so I can maneuver about easier and quicker.

 

nick of time

(651 posts)
206. Nope, not at all.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:15 AM
Jan 2013

I just get tired of the insults on both sides of the issue. Insults don't contribute in any way towards working out a solution to a problem, any problem.

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
14. I'm not that short
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:24 PM
Jan 2013

but that's part of the reason I've got my Wrangler Unlimited. That and if I see anyone using a mobile phone in their hand I put the fear of God up them as I steer in their direction - my tyres are just under the height of a wing on a normal car.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
8. Kind of a strange disconnect in your OP
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:21 PM
Jan 2013

On the one hand you were suggesting we understand their psychology, presumably to get better results from dealing with them. Then you ended with a total rejection of that understanding with "those gun totting (sic) reptiles." I just found that funny.

 

nick of time

(651 posts)
9. I have an SUV because it's perfectly suited for farm work
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:23 PM
Jan 2013

and I do like to go 4 wheeling, I also bought an AR-15 from a friend of mine for $300.00 because it's perfectly suited for shooting the coyotes that go after my chickens and ducks, not because of some reptillian primal instinct.
And your little insult of gun totting reptiles, no wonder we have such a divide in this country, and I mean both sides of the extreme.

Mosby

(16,310 posts)
44. The Expedition has maybe 8 inches of ground clearance
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:22 PM
Jan 2013

Like most full size SUVs, they are definitely not designed for off-road.

A real off-road vehicle like the Toyota Tacoma has 12" of ground clearance.



kwassa

(23,340 posts)
49. The clearance on most SUVs is a myth ...
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:02 PM
Jan 2013

the bumpers may be three feet off the ground, but the bottom of the differential housing is only eight inches off the ground, and that is what is going to hit first.

srican69

(1,426 posts)
25. you may have a perfectly valid reason to buy an SUV and an AR-15 sir ..
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:50 PM
Jan 2013

I am talking about the average guy living in the city or suburban are who will NEVER EVER go off roading to justify having a SUV ..( and gives feeling safe in one as the reason)

read the research on SUVs and the Reptilian brain by Clotaire Rapaille..

 

nick of time

(651 posts)
27. That's fair enough.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:52 PM
Jan 2013

Last edited Mon Jan 28, 2013, 09:14 PM - Edit history (1)

However calling people gun toting reptiles is OTT in my humble opinion.

Response to nick of time (Reply #27)

 

nick of time

(651 posts)
61. I also have 2 pick ups that my employees use for that kind of hauling.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jan 2013

I also have 1 pick up that's licensed and use that to haul supplies. My SUV is used for getting around my farm and going to town.
Shoveling manure into a Ford Expedition isn't very practical now, is it?

 

Lesmoderesstupides

(156 posts)
17. I have an SUV cuz it is hard to get through 6+" of snow in the mountains in a car
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:30 PM
Jan 2013

When they make a car that can do what my SUV does I will glady buy it.

Now I also own guns but I don't need an AR, no one does IMHO, plenty of other guns are available that will do the job.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
127. Socialists who pay to plow the roads.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:31 PM
Jan 2013

Unlike some of the Randian "you're on your own" counties in the USA.

 

Lesmoderesstupides

(156 posts)
194. My SUV gets better mileage than an XC90 so you want me to get a vehicle that uses more gas?
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 05:34 AM
Jan 2013

Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2013, 10:36 AM - Edit history (2)

Also is not American Union built.

Why would I want to waste gas and not support American Union workers I am not a Republican.

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
202. My 2000 Saab 9-3 gets 22 in town 35 highway.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 10:31 AM
Jan 2013

And goes through snow drifts.

I bought it new 13 years ago after looking at "American" built cars. Unfortunately they were pretty much crap then.

 

Lesmoderesstupides

(156 posts)
203. So you stab your working brothers and sisters in the back, and buy a non US union made car
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 10:36 AM
Jan 2013

good job.

Thanks for supporting American Workers and Jobs!

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
214. Saab was owned by GM at the time.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:39 PM
Jan 2013

I owned GM stock.


Have fun storming the castle.

Or do the other thing and enjoy your stay.


GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
223. Are you always this charming?
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 06:18 PM
Jan 2013

Or did you just pick it up recently?

But your name certainly suits you.

Is it self descriptive? Or are you trying to be clever?

Enjoy your stay or is it your return?

patrice

(47,992 posts)
31. He, he..., but don't forget that in places like cupcake land that's bragging rights for women too.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:56 PM
Jan 2013

lynne

(3,118 posts)
32. Don't have a SUV, but have an extended cab pickup -
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:59 PM
Jan 2013

- that takes almost a stepladder to get into. I like it because I can see much better than in our automobile. I can see more of the road and further down the road. Am also able to see around shrubs, signs, etc. that block my vision when in the other car. Plus I can haul firewood, take our trash to the dump, take metal to the recycle place, pick up lumber and building supplies.

I think that psychologist needs to get out of the office and interact with the public every so often.

srican69

(1,426 posts)
33. fortune 500 companies flock to him to pay millions of dollars .. you still think he needs to get out
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:00 PM
Jan 2013

Ernesto

(5,077 posts)
45. My 2WD Ford F250 extendo cab diesel gets 30 MPG on the highway.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:30 PM
Jan 2013

IF I keep my foot out of the turbocharger and use the cruise control........

Locrian

(4,522 posts)
41. not just AR15
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:16 PM
Jan 2013

Or SUVs, or cars, or guns, or....

We're ALL manipulated by marketing. The gun manufactures / industry's "products" are "advertised" 24/7/365 in just about every TV/Movie/Game etc. They are shown as tools of the hero, as ways to solve problems, as ways to 'save the day' etc.

Then there's the "zombie apocalypse", TV "shooter" reality shows, etc, etc, etc.

We need to start looking at some of this as a marketing issue - that's what's driving a lot of these 'new' bubble and fear/fantasy buyers..

Look at the crazy sales of the iPhone FFS. Similar marketing phenomenon/craze, except you can't shoot 20 people with an iPhone.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
189. That is the truth
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:29 AM
Jan 2013

and for those poking fun at the 'marketing psychologist dude' some of those guys are the shrewest, smartest psychologists out there - they make people think they NEED shit they don't really need - on a regular basis. They get kids drooling over McDonalds, make women run out for plastic surgery, cause panics on sale days and basically manipulate all of society. They study your wants, your needs, your weaknesses, your habits, your values, your income, your families and they know what buttons to push. They make you BELIEVE what you want to believe about their product. Hell, there are examples of it in this thread! LOL. Underestimate these vampires at your own risk but don't discount their knowledge. They know you better than you do.

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
43. SUVs mean that you'll survive a crash with a smaller vehicle, it's a kind of bullying
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:21 PM
Jan 2013

in that sense. Though I don't think most people buying them realize this. Those that drive small sedans and are harrassed by reckless SUVs do see it this way.

On this topic an elderly man was killed last weekend in San Diego by a Land Rover SUV. They were not cited because supposedly there was not enough time to stop and he wandered into the road. However, if it had been a lighter sedan he might not have died and the person might have had better control to swerve.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
46. Trucks are useful.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:44 PM
Jan 2013

I prefer a 4x4 with the smallest engine and a manual transmission. Right now that is the Toyota Tacoma since Ford killed the Ranger (moronic act). It's annoying that the compact truck market has been gutted. Trucks are very useful to haul goods and 4wheel drive is a necessity in the north.

It has nothing to do with superiority complexes - 8 foot long lumber just doesn't fit in my compact car.

REP

(21,691 posts)
47. Guess you didn't hear: SUV drivers are less likely to die in a crash.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 04:49 PM
Jan 2013
http://www.iihs.org/externaldata/srdata/docs/sr4605.pdf

My car is one of the more likely to not do so well ... mostly because it is small.

we can do it

(12,184 posts)
75. No they are not
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:07 PM
Jan 2013


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/04/the-most-dangerous-cars-i_n_1568029.html#slide=more230404
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/17/business/safety-gap-grows-wider-between-suv-s-and-cars.html
http://automotive.lilithezine.com/SUVs-Are-Dangerous.html


Myth: SUVs are safer than cars.

Reality: SUVs are no safer than cars for their occupants, and pose much greater dangers for other road users. SUV occupants die slightly more often than car occupants in crashes. The occupant death rate in crashes per million SUVs on the road is 6 percent higher than the death rate per million cars. The occupant death rate for the largest SUVs, which tend to be driven by middle-aged families, is 8 percent higher than the occupant death rate for minivans and upper-midsize cars like the Ford Taurus and Toyota Camry, which are typically driven by similar families. SUV occupants are much more likely than car occupants to die in a rollover, which accounts for about 1,000 more deaths a year than if the same people had been in cars. In collisions with other vehicles, however, SUVs are nearly three times as likely as cars to kill other drivers, inflicting another 1,000 unnecessary deaths a year among motorists who would have survived if hit instead by cars of the same weight. SUVs also contribute much more than cars to air pollution, causing up to 1,000 extra deaths a year among people with respiratory ailments.http://thedetroitproject.com/readmore/myths.htm


Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
182. Like the article says, Electronic Stability Control
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 12:58 AM
Jan 2013

The reason top heavy vehicles roll over is because of less lateral stability. If you prevent them from going sideways, they don't roll over, or at least it's a lot harder to get them to roll over in the longitudinal direction.

What they do is make the roads less safe for passenger vehicles because their bumpers tend to be higher.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
60. I guess that could be since I mostly see women driving SUVs...
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jan 2013

Most guys I see drive cars or trucks.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
160. No. I don't drive by them much
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 10:18 PM
Jan 2013

I tend to get sucked into their parking lot like a comet in orbit and have to buy a burger to reach escape velocity.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
67. It NEVER fails, people have a personal bone to pick with SUV's so DU is the bashing grounds
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:40 PM
Jan 2013

bullshit


Fail

the DU purity squad strikes again.

PS


The Japanese make MORE and just as DIRTY GAS GUZZLING SUv's as the Big three, so fail times three.

Meh


time for another ignore list special

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
84. Thoughtless, shallow pseudo mass mind-reading post is thoughtless and shallow
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:25 PM
Jan 2013

I drive an SUV because my activities often involve driving in areas where 4-wheel drive is necessary.

A psychologist ( I forget his name) did a study ( that included the subjects being interviewed in partial state of sleep) and came to the conclusion that the reason people bought the vehicles was that the increased ground clearance gave them a feeling of superiority on the roads ..

That reminds me of the story about the famous mathematician who was stricken for several days with a terrible case of constipation.

He worked it out with a pencil.

I have a degree in psychology and I have no idea where your apocryphal story came from. I am also not aware of any research showing validity for interviews conducted in anything other than a fully conscious state.

My guess is that...

Yes, it's just that. A guess. Real life motivations of members of a large and diverse group of people can rarely be summarized in a few sentences that were concocted without doing any actual research.

Have you asked even ONE person who owns a firearm (or an SUV) why he or she made the decision to acquire it?

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
198. I think like a dozen people have beaten you to that canard.
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 09:37 AM
Jan 2013

Thanks for playing, I'm sure there are other threads requiring dick comments though.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
89. Ok, explain those of us who need the ground clearance
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:49 PM
Jan 2013

And the 4x4 capability for well...work...

FYI I know the vehicle has a higher chance of a roll over, drive accordingly.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
93. You are talking to people who think they are smarter than the rest of us
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:55 PM
Jan 2013

and think by taking SUVs off the road they'll solve the world's petroleum problems.

If they had any common sense they'd see the radical change over the past decade in SUV/Crossover millage.


But they are just too ignorant to be bothered. They have their little soapbox here so they get up on it like chickens, cluck cluck, the farmer is bad cluck cluck.


Many many words to describe them and even though they use "little dicks" and get away with it. I can think of something smaller between their eyes.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
107. Well, we bought a 2004 Jeep
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:13 PM
Jan 2013

1.- Could not afford new

2.- All the fancy electronics are not a good idea well...off road.

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
96. Not that many people buy them
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:59 PM
Jan 2013

but those who do, buy them often. I don't really think it is to make them feel "safer", because if you think it takes an AR-15, you will never truly feel safe. I fortunately cannot imagine living in the headspace where I would come to think owning an AR-15 is a necessity. You have to be expecting quite an attack to need that sort of equipment.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
116. They're popular because they're small, light, and low-powered
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:10 PM
Jan 2013

Sort of the opposite of the direction you're going.

 

justanidea

(291 posts)
115. Wow, I learn something new on DU everyday.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:07 PM
Jan 2013

Here I thought I bought my Jeep Wrangler because I loved driving with the top/doors off, enjoyed off-roading and wanted 4 wheel drive for the winter, and just loved the rugged simplicity of the truck.

Turns out I was actually only buying it to compensate for a small penis and to feel superior to others.

I guess I can add Jeep ownership in with gun ownership and fishing to the list of things DU has told me are socially unacceptable.



we can do it

(12,184 posts)
129. It seems they both have the "I am more important than everyone else" attitude.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:32 PM
Jan 2013

This does not apply to those who legitimately use guns or big trucks for work or necessity. NO, pushing others out of the way at the mall is not necessity.

Who cares if others are safe and the planet is able to support human life? Its all about me.

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
131. And for those of you who equate small penises with driving SUV's
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:40 PM
Jan 2013

I've been "in" the auto industry since 1966. If you haven't figured out what the UAW icon means in my posts it stands for the United Auto Workers. I've never owned a Japanese or Korean vehicle and never will.


Those of you YOU attack the US auto industry are nothing more than Right wing enablers and you are attacking the many Unions involved in building cars for GM, Chrysler and Ford.

Shame on you and your imported crap

Have a nice life

Response to srican69 (Original post)

DainBramaged

(39,191 posts)
149. So women driving SUv's are reptiles with itty bitty penises?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 09:25 PM
Jan 2013

Mega fail.


This thread, as the Mythbusters would say, if busted, fucking busted.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
150. People also bought them as an alternative to a minivan.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 09:32 PM
Jan 2013

Compared to a typical minivan, an early-to-mid 90's SUV had slightly worse gas mileage, 4-wheel drive, superior towing ability, and plenty of room for kids and cargo.

Back when gas was $1.19 a gallon, people figured that paying a couple of hundred dollars a year extra was worth this hit for better mobility in the snow and the increased towing ability. A Ford Explorer would get maybe 16mpg, a minivan maybe 18. A large sedan would get maybe 20. And in the hilly, snowy parts of the country the 4wd helped quite a bit.


Of course, they looked cooler than a minivan, too, which certainly didn't hurt sales.



But the fact of people buying AR-15s is something a bit different. IF you've made the choice to own a gun to defend your home against an intruder(s), then picking the AR-15 or similar is a quite logical choice.

AR-15s and other rifles have superior power to handguns, and are easier to aim. Unlike shotguns, rifles intended for self-defense use offer more accuracy, much less recoil, and can hold more cartridges. And because they are semi-automatic, AR-15s and similar don't have any mechanical controls that require operation during a crisis situation.

AR-15s also have a boatload of accessories available from dozens of different makers.

People pick the AR-15 because it's a good choice. A name-brand AR-15 is a quality piece of machinery that does what it is intended to do quite well.

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
163. LOL
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 10:24 PM
Jan 2013

I drive to the range in my Toyota Corolla. The money I save on gas I spend on reloading components.

 

sylvi

(813 posts)
166. People who are obsessed with the correlation of penis size and personal possessions
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 10:46 PM
Jan 2013

have small penises.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
185. I'm going to call it RODWIN'S LAW...
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:36 AM
Jan 2013

It states: "As an online discussion about cars, motorcycles, boats, or guns grows longer, the probability of a useless statement involving Penis Size approaches 1." In other words, Rodwin observed that, given enough time, in any online discussion involving cars, motorcycles, boats, or guns—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably makes a statement about Penis Size.

I usually see it when the person posting has no substantive argument and cannot in any way add to the discussion but feels compelled to chime in anyway.

JVS

(61,935 posts)
213. "Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people."
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:11 PM
Jan 2013

said Elanor Roosevelt.

I suppose one could modify it to address those who talk about penises.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
168. Yeah, that's pretty obvious
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 10:50 PM
Jan 2013

"I'm a big manly man with my big gun and big loud truck and I must conform so my neighbors know that I'm a manly man just like them and just to make sure I wear a douchey beard just like Toby Keith!"

Algebra Palin

(34 posts)
169. it isn't that deep for me.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 10:56 PM
Jan 2013

i drive an SUV cos i like sitting high up.
i got an ak because it was pretty much a novelty (to me) at time.

Adam-Bomb

(90 posts)
177. Oh, Man, you guys crack me up
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 11:25 PM
Jan 2013

I got a 95 GMC 4x4 Surburban because the 3/4 ton truck I wanted was already sold.

The "Lead Sled" had the towing package I DID want, and I let my wife talk
me into it.....I'm glad she did.

Besides the towing package, it's great on trips, I can fold or take out the rear
seats and haul almost anything, and it has been extremely reliable.....almost
200,000 miles on it, now.

It's also VERY comfortable.

Now, it does spend a lot of time holding down my driveway, but we didn't get
it for a daily driver. It's paid for, and insurance is like $110.00 every six months.

I go to the range in the Chrysler minivan

VOX

(22,976 posts)
184. Welcome to DU. Hope you've got more going than gats 'n guzzlers...
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 01:04 AM
Jan 2013

You know, sum of them-there l'ib'rul idees 'n such.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
178. Your message is lost in the weeds
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 11:40 PM
Jan 2013

You'll be nitpicked to death.

Personally, I drive a Juke; a car which, though very compact, has a high ground clearance, compensated with independent 4-wheel steering for control. My wife was in a crash a few weeks ago. Although the car that rear-ended her left his license plate number stamped on the muffler and that car, a Nissan Acura, had to be towed from the scene, airbag deployed, my wife was able to drive the car from the scene after being crunched between the Acura and a Grand Marquis in front. Total damage to our vehicle, $9,000.00 Total damage to wife and son, $0.00. A car that can drive away with that much damage is a good car.

I understand your point about guns, and I agree with it.

But you steered and crashed into a whole different subject...

fujiyama

(15,185 posts)
190. These comparisons work to a very limited extent
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:45 AM
Jan 2013

Yes, there is a psychological factor of your safety being reinforced by owning the bigger gun or driving the bigger vehicle. We live in a very paranoid and distrustful society and it seems to have got worse over the years. Skepticism has given way to wholesale paranoia and fear.

The reality is that for some, SUVs serve a purpose (especially small and mid-range). But even a Ford Excursion or Expedition or a Chevy Suburban serves some utilitarian purpose - of fitting more people, hauling more stuff, or towing more weight.

Semi-Automatic guns and Assault weapons are exactly that. They're weapons. Guns are meant to kill, hurt, or destroy - whether it's for warfare, hunting, or sports - it's meant to send a projectile at a target. They're inherently and intrinsically destructive tools. That's what they're made to do. They're made with that particular purpose.

No civilian really needs an AR-15 and very few need a Ford Excursion, but the former has no real practical value for hunting or home defense. The latter is a monstrosity but can be used in public in a safe manner. Yes, an AR-15 can also be used safely (at say, a firing range or in a remote area), but ultimately they are either weapons of warfare or close enough to it. The real question is whether we as a society should behave as if individuals are always on a war-footing. It strikes me as an odd way for a society to function.

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
207. the reason is.....GROUPTHINK!!! yay narrow-minded insulting fools who can't read!
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 11:27 AM
Jan 2013

What is Groupthink?



Groupthink, a term coined by social psychologist Irving Janis (1972), occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (p. 9). Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups. A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background, when the group is insulated from outside opinions, and when there are no clear rules for decision making.
http://www.psysr.org/about/pubs_resources/groupthink%20overview.htm

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
219. My guess is that like other commodities, Madison Avenue has done a bang-up job
Tue Jan 29, 2013, 04:34 PM
Jan 2013

My guess is that like other commodities, Madison Avenue has done a bang-up job branding their products to a base-line demographic, and then laying out an appeal for that demographic to trumpet.

And like other commodities, we will aggressively protest all criticisms to the contrary with a righteous might and a smörgåsbord of rationalizations and justifications, from simple appeal and desire to the vague and a diaphanous "it's the one that's right for me".

Madison Avenue has sold all of us a bill of goods, and we all willingly purchased it in many varied forms, from computers operating systems to vehicles to rootin'-tootin' weapons. In our opportunistic culture, the "we" is more often than not, merely lip service. The "me" is our priority, and we will defend our personal desires above the collective good of humanity.

The Enlightenment was a very cool experiment, but it really didn't work as well as was first thought.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reason people buy AR-15 t...