Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums...GOP still can’t shake that “47 percent” problem
The Morning Plum: GOP still cant shake that 47 percent problem
Posted by Greg Sargent
That 47 percent problem just wont go away.
One of the big stories of the morning is that Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinellis new book contains passages that are very similar to the 47 percent comments that helped doom Mitt Romneys candidacy. It remains to be seen how damaging the comments will be to Cuccinelli, a rising star within the party. But beyond that, the news showcases the broader difficulties the GOP faces as Republicans soul search about how to remake their party.
Here are the key Cuccinelli comments, which are directed at unnamed politicians:
Theres been a great deal of chatter among Republicans lately that they dont really need to change their ideas; they merely need to change their tone. But as Cuccinnellis comments demonstrate, the ideas are the tone. The basic problem here is not the rhetoric; its the apparent belief among many conservatives that there isnt any legitimate way that government assistance can be a positive force in peoples lives...This sort of thinking is increasingly at odds with the American mainstream, particularly the Obama coalition of minorities, college educated white women, and young voters that asserted itself in the last election. When it comes to Latinos in particular, the partys problem is not just rooted in its harsh stance on immigration, as Jamelle Bouie noted recently. Its also rooted in the fact that Latinos view government as a positive force and are repelled by the GOPs hostile anti-government rhetoric. As such, it remains to be seen whether embracing immigration reform will even help repair the partys relationship with this constituency.
Romneys 47 percent comments didnt doom him because of their harshness alone, though that certainly played a part. Rather, he lost partly because of what those comments reflected: A broader inability to articulate any affirmative role for government to play in peoples lives. As many others have observed, the GOPs basic problem is that it hasnt articulated an actual policy agenda that has any chance of developing broad appeal. This task is only made harder by the need to pander to many within the party who hew to the actual beliefs underlying Romneys 47 percent comments beliefs that are perfectly captured in Cuccinellis new book.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/01/31/the-morning-plum-gop-still-cant-shake-that-47-percent-problem/
Posted by Greg Sargent
That 47 percent problem just wont go away.
One of the big stories of the morning is that Virginia attorney general Ken Cuccinellis new book contains passages that are very similar to the 47 percent comments that helped doom Mitt Romneys candidacy. It remains to be seen how damaging the comments will be to Cuccinelli, a rising star within the party. But beyond that, the news showcases the broader difficulties the GOP faces as Republicans soul search about how to remake their party.
Here are the key Cuccinelli comments, which are directed at unnamed politicians:
The amazing this is that they often grow government without protest from citizens, and sometimes they even get buy-in from citizens at least from the ones getting the goodies One of their favorite ways to increase their power is by creating programs that dispense subsidized government benefits, such as Medicare, Social Security, and outright welfare (Medicaid, food stamps, subsidized housing, and the like). These programs make people dependent on government. And once people are dependent, they feel they cant afford to have the programs taken away, no matter how inefficient, poorly run, or costly to the rest of society. <...>
Citizens will vote for those politicians who promise more benefits each year, rather than the fiscally responsible politicians who try to point out that such programs are unsustainable and will eventually bankrupt the states or the nation Creating government dependency is the typical method of operation for big-government statists.
Theres been a great deal of chatter among Republicans lately that they dont really need to change their ideas; they merely need to change their tone. But as Cuccinnellis comments demonstrate, the ideas are the tone. The basic problem here is not the rhetoric; its the apparent belief among many conservatives that there isnt any legitimate way that government assistance can be a positive force in peoples lives...This sort of thinking is increasingly at odds with the American mainstream, particularly the Obama coalition of minorities, college educated white women, and young voters that asserted itself in the last election. When it comes to Latinos in particular, the partys problem is not just rooted in its harsh stance on immigration, as Jamelle Bouie noted recently. Its also rooted in the fact that Latinos view government as a positive force and are repelled by the GOPs hostile anti-government rhetoric. As such, it remains to be seen whether embracing immigration reform will even help repair the partys relationship with this constituency.
Romneys 47 percent comments didnt doom him because of their harshness alone, though that certainly played a part. Rather, he lost partly because of what those comments reflected: A broader inability to articulate any affirmative role for government to play in peoples lives. As many others have observed, the GOPs basic problem is that it hasnt articulated an actual policy agenda that has any chance of developing broad appeal. This task is only made harder by the need to pander to many within the party who hew to the actual beliefs underlying Romneys 47 percent comments beliefs that are perfectly captured in Cuccinellis new book.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/01/31/the-morning-plum-gop-still-cant-shake-that-47-percent-problem/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 658 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
...GOP still can’t shake that “47 percent” problem (Original Post)
ProSense
Jan 2013
OP
If Cuccinelli is a "rising star in the Republican Party" it will be good for Democrats.
yellowcanine
Jan 2013
#1
yellowcanine
(35,704 posts)1. If Cuccinelli is a "rising star in the Republican Party" it will be good for Democrats.
Think Rick Santorum on steroids. The guy is driven by religious based factoids and plays a key role in what Politico calls the "GOP's Virginia problem."
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/the-gops-virginia-problem-86977.html?ml=po_r
As it is, Cuccinelli has already split the Republican Party in Virginia and it could hand the governor's office to the Democrats as well as allow Democrats to pick up seats in the Legislature.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)2. AKA: "Jimmy Carter's Revenge." :-)