Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 10:54 AM Jan 2013

Federal Rule Limits Aid to Families Who Can’t Afford Employers’ Health Coverage

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/31/us/politics/irs-to-base-insurance-affordability-on-single-coverage.html?_r=0


WASHINGTON — The Obama administration adopted a strict definition of affordable health insurance on Wednesday that will deny federal financial assistance to millions of Americans with modest incomes who cannot afford family coverage offered by employers.

In deciding whether an employer’s health plan is affordable, the Internal Revenue Service said it would look at the cost of coverage only for an individual employee, not for a family. Family coverage might be prohibitively expensive, but federal subsidies would not be available to help buy insurance for children in the family.

The policy decision came in a final regulation interpreting ambiguous language in the 2010 health care law.

Under the law, most Americans will be required to have health insurance starting next year. Low- and middle-income people can get tax credits to help them pay premiums, unless they have access to affordable coverage from an employer.




No help for families with children, no coverage for K-Y Jelly. Welcome to Healthcare in America.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Rule Limits Aid to Families Who Can’t Afford Employers’ Health Coverage (Original Post) Scuba Jan 2013 OP
Don't forget, no coverage for any child under their own policy. ScreamingMeemie Jan 2013 #1
du rec. nt xchrom Jan 2013 #2
Sounds counterproductive abelenkpe Jan 2013 #3

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
1. Don't forget, no coverage for any child under their own policy.
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 10:57 AM
Jan 2013

No dependents on preexisting coverage for their parents. It's a great thing.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Rule Limits Aid t...