General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe term Attention Whore
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by REP (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Well, I have been around DU a long time. I don't post too often, but this is a first to me. Apparently it is ok to refer to Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin {none of whom I like or have any respect for} and a host of other right wing women as Media Whores as found by google search, but call Media Benjamin and Dennis Kucinich media whores ( Spending time on Fox News trashing the President and Democrats) and your post gets hidden by a 4-2 jury vote.
I was certainly not referring to Ms Benjamin or Mr Mr Kucinich sexuality, but their willingness to say anything to get on TV, even Fox.
Is it ok to use the term media whore when talking of a man and not ok when talking of a woman. I used the term in a gender neutral way by mentioning them both.
What is a better term to use?
Bucky
(54,087 posts)But only in the gender-neutral sense of the word slut.
Bucky
(54,087 posts)or Fox weasel.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)the fact a fairly sizable minority of DU rs are Kucinich apologists.
You apparently have had a run in with said group.
bamacrat
(3,867 posts)Keep saying if it applies. Pay no attention to the word police and the nice Nazi's........Alert! Alert!
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Many of those of us on the liberal side feel appreciation and respect for Kucinich and other liberals, in a way we definitely don't feel any kind of appreciation for those right wingers such as Malkin or Coulter.
oldhippie
(3,249 posts)... or pretty much anything else (with the exception of a few Forbidden Words.) Democrats? Not so much. At least that is what I have observed. It's Community Standards.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Skittles
(153,258 posts)many of them completely miss the point - it's the roll of the dice, bottomofthehill - sometimes they get it and sometimes they simply DO NOT
lpbk2713
(42,770 posts)... or the jury member(s) renders a verdict renders a verdict on the wrong post.
True, the DU jury system needs some serious work.
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)lpbk2713
(42,770 posts)Kind of surprised you don't recall noticing it if you find it disconcerting.
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Don't expect to make any sense of the rules.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)I mean really, what a fucking transparent horseshit post of character assination.
Both those two have done more in a few hours then you probably have in a lifetime for progressive causes.
It appears DU is not DB free zone.
REP
(21,691 posts)This does not fit the SoP of this Forum, but can be reposted in Meta-Discussion. Thanks!