Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UrbScotty

(23,980 posts)
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 09:34 PM Feb 2013

Kansas Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Same-Sex Adoption

On Friday, the Kansas Supreme Court issued a ruling protecting the rights of same-sex couples to both be recognized as the legal parents of the children they are raising together. The case involved two women, Marci Frazier and Kelly Goudschaal, who had been raising children together, but then faced a custody dispute after they separated. The Court ruled that the coparenting contract the couple had signed is valid and should be recognized, because their children are better off having two parents than just one:

To summarize, the coparenting agreement before us cannot be construed as a prohibited sale of the children because the biological mother retains her parental duties and responsibilities. The agreement is not injurious to the public because it provides the children with the resources of two persons, rather than leaving them as the fatherless children of an artificially inseminated mother. No societal interest has been harmed; no mischief has been done. Like the contract in Shirk, the coparenting agreement here contains “no element of immorality or illegality and did not violate public policy,” but rather “the contract was for the advantage and welfare of the child[ren].”


The decision remands the case back to the district court with this guidance to work out the details for the couple.

The conclusion in this case is simple and poignant: a child’s parents are the people that have legally committed to caring for them, not necessarily who they are biologically connected to. Interestingly, the justices do not even address the question of same-sex marriage, recognizing that protecting the interests of children is what takes priority. In this case, the children deserve to enjoy the continued support of both of their moms, and nothing in Kansas law prevents that.


http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/02/25/1633621/kansas-supreme-court-rules-in-favor-of-same-sex-adoption/
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kansas Supreme Court Rules In Favor Of Same-Sex Adoption (Original Post) UrbScotty Feb 2013 OP
“the contract was for the advantage and welfare of the child.” Skittles Feb 2013 #1
I imagine the whole Phelps family are doing this... JeffHead Feb 2013 #2
Couldn't think of a better group of misfits than the Phelps! RKP5637 Feb 2013 #3
Westboro hell! Tagish_Charlie Feb 2013 #4
brownback also! rurallib Feb 2013 #6
Du rec. Nt xchrom Feb 2013 #5
Heather has two mommies... plus a damn good lawyer. Jim Lane Feb 2013 #7
Well, this is one of maybe two times a year Kansas is right about something Zoeisright Feb 2013 #8
 

Tagish_Charlie

(85 posts)
4. Westboro hell!
Mon Feb 25, 2013, 10:10 PM
Feb 2013

Supreme Mullah, Taliban Sam, Ruler of Brownbackistan has to be drooling in his shoes over this one

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
7. Heather has two mommies... plus a damn good lawyer.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 02:04 AM
Feb 2013

The legal reasoning is clear, but I imagine the lawyer had to work some to help the judges get past the fact that it was a same-sex couple.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kansas Supreme Court Rule...