General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWealth Inequality Is a Problem, but How Do You Even Begin to Solve It?
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/03/wealth-inequality-is-a-problem-but-how-do-you-even-begin-to-solve-it/273769/You might consider America's vast wealth inequality, vividly illustrated in this viral video, to be offensive, infuriating, or irrelevant. But it is not terribly mysterious.
Rich people have more money. More money tends to lead to bigger properties, fatter savings, and better access to capital markets. As a result, the top 1% of the country controls between 40 and 50 percent of the total wealth from stocks and bonds. What's more, the very very richest people tend to be lawyers, doctors, and executives, especially in finance, with equity in their firms and companies. The overwhelming source of high wealth (as opposed to high income) at the tippy top comes from stocks, real estate, and business equity. And it's basically going to the tippy top.
The share of total household wealth, which has fallen at the bottom thanks to the housing bust, is accumulating at the top 1 percent.
The two easiest ways to think about reducing wealth inequality are (a) building up the bottom and (b) cutting down the top. These aren't equally sensible approaches, they're just the two most obvious. From the bottom, if we found ways to make poor and middle class families save more, they could invest that money in assets that got more valuable over time, and this would increase their wealth. From the top, one extreme solution beyond raising taxes would be to find ways to cap income and compensation.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)For later.
on point
(2,506 posts)TheMastersNemesis
(10,602 posts)As long as there is one Republican left in power you will get what you get.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)I mean - great if we could do it - but doesn't seem all that likely.
Bryant
juajen
(8,515 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)'if we found ways to make poor and middle class families save more' - yeah perhaps we we just keep at that sort of neoliberal bullshit trickle down idiocy for another 50 years.
You can't 'save more' if your household income has been flatlined or declining ever since the 1970s, even with bullshit chained CPI accounting.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)magellan
(13,257 posts)institute a financial transaction tax, raise taxes on the wealthy, give significant tax breaks to businesses that keep jobs here and hire Americans, rebuild our unions, provide a meaningful stimulus package to a) rehire axed public workers and b) hire more public workers for infrastructure and renewable energy jobs....
Basically, do everything cons hate and our best economists suggest.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)magellan
(13,257 posts)That's what I'll be doing from now on. I never want to regret my vote again.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)'Easy' in the sense that they would not take much more than a revamp of the tax code. But impossible in today's America, where the Government has been bought by those same 1%ers.
FDR managed to do it, but in his time the government wasn't owned by the Koch's of the day.
The easy fix: raise income taxes to 50% for the top tier, eliminate deductions for those making over 500K/yr, eliminate loopholes and tax shelters, tax all income regardless of source at the same rate. Eliminate bonuses and exec pay as deductions from corporations. Make sure the estate tax is at least 50% on large estates. In one or 2 generations we would be back to a reasonable level of income and wealth distribution.
It will never happen, though.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)serious inheritance tax, guaranteed access to education pre-k to PhD, fair trade, no more 0% interest to banks, clamp down on speculation, and the living wage to start.