General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)80K is chump change.
Drale
(7,932 posts)Abortion and euthanasia
Cardinal Bergoglio has invited his clergy and laity to oppose both abortion and euthanasia.
Homosexuality
He has affirmed church teaching on homosexuality, though he teaches the importance of respecting individuals who are gay or lesbian He strongly opposed legislation introduced in 2010 by the Argentine Government to allow same-sex marriage, calling it a "real and dire anthropological throwback". In a letter to the monasteries of Buenos Aires, he wrote: "Let's not be naive, we're not talking about a simple political battle; it is a destructive pretension against the plan of God. We are not talking about a mere bill, but rather a machination of the Father of Lies that seeks to confuse and deceive the children of God." He has also insisted that adoption by gay and lesbian people is a form of discrimination against children. This position received a rebuke from Argentine president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, who said the church's tone was reminiscent of "medieval times and the Inquisition".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Francis#Homosexuality
freshwest
(53,661 posts)To please God by making more people?
To make more cannon fodder for the leaders of the world or corporations?
I find this reasoning to be suspect. But then I'm a humanist. This also fits under my NOYB category.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)hopefully . . . if someone leads him to read DU...
TheMightyFavog
(13,770 posts)A very simple cross.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Bergoglio gave up his chauffeured car and rode the bus so he could see and talk to his flock, sold the residence of his office and lived in a small apartment in a middle-class area of BA so that nobody could be mistaken he was better than the laity. He's been very vocal about poverty. He chose to name himself after Francis of Assisi. He spent the church's money well to provide aid during Argentina's long economic collapse to the poorest among his flock. He's a staunch voice for pastoral work and a man of the people.
There's a lot to dislike about the guy (he's a rabid homophobe who is obsessed with the idea that gay marriage is a Satanic lie and adoption of children by gay people is a form of child abuse...for starters), but I think awareness and combating poverty is the one thing you can't get on the guy about.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)What says living simply like stashing prisoners on your island vacation home?
Chan790
(20,176 posts)What does his shitty record on opposing abuse of political prisoners have to do with the price of tea in China?
The topic was his awareness and combating of poverty.
Most of the hierarchy of the church in Argentina supported the RW and nominally-Catholic junta. He's also a homophobe. He sees Satanic boogiemen in everything. He opposes death-with-dignity laws. He's rabidly pro-life. He opposes ordination of women or a place in the hierarchy for women. He's not-progressive on a lot of things admittedly...none of which are poverty.
Yes, he has an island retreat. Still not an argument against his awareness of poverty concerns.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Having an island retreat, much less storing a dictator's victims there, is not a "simple" life.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts).
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,226 posts)The entire piece is well worth a read. A segment:
http://ncronline.org/blogs/parish-diary/what-would-christ-say-if-he-could-see-church-today
What would Christ say if he could see the church today?
by Fr. Peter Daly | Mar. 11, 2013
Over the next few weeks, in the run-up to the election of the new pope, the world will experience a tsunami of images from Vatican City. Ordinarily skeptical journalists will gush over the art, the architecture, the ceremonies and the history of the Vatican. Predictably, the media will fall in love with its sights and sounds. That's OK for them. They care nothing about our church. But we Catholics, who love our church and see it as the body of Christ made visible, should step back from the pomp and power and consider what image we project.
What would Jesus say if he saw a long parade of cardinals in red watered silk cassocks and lace surplices? Would he think they were vested appropriately as successors of his apostles? He told the 12 to take nothing for their first journey except a walking stick and a single tunic (Mark 6:8-9). Do these men travel in the spirit of the first apostles or in the spirit of Renaissance nobility?
What would Jesus say if he heard bishops addressed as "Your Eminence" or "Your Excellency"? Didn't he tell his followers not to be like the Pharisees, who demanded titles of honor like "rabbi," "teacher," "master" or even "father" (Matthew 23:8-10)?
What would Jesus say if he saw cardinals in long silk capes (cappa magnas) processing to seats of honor at ceremonies and styling themselves as "princes" of the church? Jesus criticized the religious leaders of his own day who demanded seats of honor in synagogues and who "widen their phylacteries and lengthen their tassels" (Matthew 23:5-6).