General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShall We Bring Back 19th Century Etiquette?
That would be a glorious thing to see in 2013.
We could, once again:
Bow politely to each other - That works nicely for the Japanese.
Tip our hats at passers-by - That would provide jobs for unemployed hatmakers.
Write invitations and thank you notes in longhand - A very genteel sort of thing to do.
Entertain our friends regularly with lovely dinners at home - Ever so much nicer than eating fast food, I think.
Begin leaving cards when we visit - Even if the person we're visiting is "not at home."
Sit in parlors and discuss current events - Conversation has become a lost art.
Or perhaps not. Such are the musings of an old man with a collection of 19th Century etiquette books...
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)etiquette is one rule:
Before shaking hands with another person, it's polite to wipe the Cheetos dust from your hand on your trousers.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)it's only proper to eat Cheetos with your left hand.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)Why, any properly raised person knows that. Besides people who are left-handed are such a bore at dinner, arms all akimbo and so forth. A properly-raised person learns to use the right hand correctly.
But as for countries with medieval toilet habits, one wouldn't have a person from such a place in one's home in any case, would one? Of course Ambassadors and the like usually have learned proper behavior to some degree, so they can be admitted, if necessary.
hlthe2b
(102,263 posts)That includes being aware of what is around you and your body in relation to others... Even without the incessant cell phone use, I can't tell you how many times I have been struck by flailing arms or literally stepped on by those persistently fixated on themselves and oblivious to all others. Not to mention the people who let doors slam in the face of those a mere step behind them--even when that person is on crutches.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)idea that you are not the most important person on the planet.
Remembering that would eliminate the need for any formal etiquette.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)for a handshake. It's rude otherwise for a man to offer first.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)properly introduced, it's impolite to impose yourself on the person in the first place.
One can ask a mutual friend for an introduction, of course, but that friend should check with the other person to make sure such an introduction is appropriate. It can be very complicated, indeed.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)when I was in middle school. I made notice that he had extended his hand to the boys near me but not to me. That's when he explained that it was rude unless I'd offered.
I think some manners are funny but I love to learn about them because I think they're something we're losing touch with.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)different school of etiquette at the time. All of that is why I've been reading old etiquette books for years. I love the subject, for its glimpse into life during other periods of history.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Just something I picked up growing up Southern. Sometimes it makes me come off as aloof; it's just kind of ingrained.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Recently I watched all the "Downton Abbey" series online. The tenor of the language was a wonder to hear. Even in disagreement the spoken civility was evident. No swearing, no stomping or verbal tantrums, just plain, but eloquent, speech.
I still write thank yous longhand....so many comment on it when I do and feel special...which is what I intend! Cards are wonderful too. I made personal cards and fabric 'cases' for them a few Christmasses ago for my female friends and relatives. I find them so handy when asked for my address when I'm standing at a service counter, etc. and use them rather than verbally announcing to all present behind me my address. Also easy to be attached to a delivery order. They were lots of fun to make but I did get the feeling that I had grown a third head! However, no one laughed when I explained their usefulness.
AHhhh....etiquette....I also wrapped up an etiquette book in fancy paper and left it for the neighborhood mother/bully. I think she figured out who left it but.....I hope she got the point.
I would love to host a dinner and have real conversation....but I fear reality teevee and sporting events would take preference. We can dream though, can't we?
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)They can be hosted by different people in their own homes. Our group does it several times a year, on a rotating basis. We're four old married couples, without children living at home. One person at least in each couple is a good cook, so the food is always good. We've all known each other for years, so it's always comfortable being together. It's a very nice tradition to have, and keeps those relationships going.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)bourgeoisie who wanted to imitate them. They never used the same etiquette with their servants and underlings. They treated those "little people" very rudely just like the trust fund babies and nouveau riche do today.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)I was being a bit facetious with my OP. I'm sorry for your confusion.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Amy Vanderbilt, who was the authority on etiquette back in my day, even said that good manners is really about being kind to the person you are dealing with. You make them feel comfortable in your presence and they should do the same. Conventions like bowing and curtsying and the modern day versions we do are not written in stone and really not necessary. They are nice but not important in the overall spirit of being polite and courteous.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)Johanna come lately in terms of proper behavior. Her ideas are decidedly pedestrian, and she certainly would not be welcome in my circles under any circumstances.
BTW, I'm currently working on an etiquette book for the 21st Century. It will be quite amusing, I assure you.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)MineralMan
(146,298 posts)on between paid jobs. It'll be an ebook. I don't have a solid completion date, though.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Keep the nice bit and throw away the crap bit.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Courtesies were for only one class.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)They realized that they needed these people as much as the 'underlings' needed them although the separation of class was forever persistent. Maybe in true historical sense the relationship wouldn't have existed however, my reply was intended to point out the language, the actual words, they used to communicate. There were some great barbs tossed back and forth but done in such a way that I could see its usefulness AND humor.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Also Jane Austen had a pretty sharp eye for what was going on between the classes.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)As time went by, it became harder and harder to find people willing to work in service. As that happened, their lot improved and people started treating their service staff better. Throughout the period, there were households who treated their employees well, along with households that didn't.
Most of the etiquette books written in the last half of the 19th century had chapters on relationships with household staff. It was interesting to see how things changed with time. Of course, following WWI, at least in the US, houses with staffs became fewer and fewer, and the etiquette and home management books of the time reflected that, focusing a lot on the home with no staff at all.
Pre-1800, it's very hard to find many etiquette books. I find that interesting. I have a couple of French ones and British ones from the 18th century, and one German one, which is difficult for me to read.
George Washington actually wrote an etiquette book, something not many people know. However, it was essential a transcription of a French book, translated and simplified by Washington. Interesting reading, though.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I saw a lot of rudeness from the upper classes directed to the obreros or working class. Maybe they didn't mistreat them, but they definitely did not afford them the same courtesies they gave their own peer group. They made sure that they felt inferior. I don't think England or Europe at large was very different and those manners were inherited from the nineteenth century.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)Austen and Dickens pre-dated the period depicted in the series. Austen by almost a hundred years at her death and Dickens by forty years. Downton Abbey writers went to length to depict the changes that were coming for the aristocracy....changing roles for women, the keeping of vast estates and the 'underlings' roles intermingled in it all. One daughter, a political activist married the Irish chauffeur, another became a writer for a London paper....lots of conflicts from what had been probably better times (traditionally) for the uber riche. These were globally changing times and I've found no review stating gross inaccuracies for the period....and I am certain the Brits would point it out. imho
DrDan
(20,411 posts)imagine having to put aside personal insults, offensive language/comments and once again be polite
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)friends. Our dining room seats eight comfortably. That kind of conversation is pretty common around our house.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)When I lived in Chile, I often went to dinner where Americans, Brits, Nazis, Communists and various other political and cultural specters were seated around the table. Now those conversations really got interesting. Oh the cooks and servers, local indigenous people of lower class status, weren't invited to the table.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)So are our friends. Our dinners, which move from home to home several times during the year, do not include anyone who is not a local indigenous person. Not much ceremony is involved.
However, in another time and place, when I was much more solvent financially, I hosted a formal Christmas holiday dinner for 24 people. It was a 19th Century British style dinner, based on a real menu from such a dinner. It was done by subscription, so the cost was divided among all of us, but I planned it and made it happen.
The idea was to actually experience the entire thing as if we were doing it then. It was held in the dining room of an old mansion which had become an event venue. We hired a staff to prepare and serve the meal, and we were all dressed to match the period. The servers were all local actors, and costumes were rented. I did a little Victorian etiquette guide for the thing, and showed the servers how it should be served in the style of that time. They were very well paid. We even had a butler to oversee the entire service and pour the wine. The dinner was prepared by a local chef, and included a boar's head and seven courses.
All of the people who participated really got into the spirit and character of the thing, and a great time was had by everyone. From beginning to end, the event lasted over six hours, from sherry before dinner service began to brandy, coffee and cigars following the meal. As a bit of historical theater, it was a huge success. The company was delightful. As a meal, it was extraordinary. As an expense, it was frightful.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)nothing better than a few couples sitting around a comfortable dining room table, some good food, some good wine . . . a few laughs, some good conversation
it seems the internet has robbed us of that pleasure
that said, we look forward to dinner with (new) friends tomorrow evening
just not often enough anymore it seems
snooper2
(30,151 posts)or we go full Beastie Boys style
Initech
(100,070 posts)MineralMan
(146,298 posts)for people who were properly raised, I assure you.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)I spent years learning to fence, and I want that investment to pay off.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)"Do please forgive my memory, it had placed you momentarily among those rejoicing in ordinary competence".
JVS
(61,935 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)oldhippie
(3,249 posts)I gotta remember that one.
that made me laugh!!
Silent3
(15,210 posts)MineralMan
(146,298 posts)I'll send royalty checks.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Whyever not?
deutsey
(20,166 posts)REP
(21,691 posts)... but I'll let a much better writer speak:
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)Learning proper etiquette was a viable way to advance one's social status, and it became even more viable after WWI. Young men and women who learned how to behave found it less difficult to move into circles that would have once been impossible to enter. Through employment and advancement, along with other things, it became possible to creep into polite society, although there was always a stigma based on family history. Still...things began to change and are still changing.
REP
(21,691 posts)Language was a thing with Shaw; he references Sweet in the Preface: "With Higgins's physique and temperament Sweet might have set the Thames on fire. As it was, he impressed himself professionally on Europe to an extent that made his comparative personal obscurity, and the failure of Oxford to do justice to his eminence, a puzzle to foreign specialists in his subject." etc.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)The more I notice that people are becoming much more polite in public. People smile at strangers now. They hold doors open. They help each other out. They have short exchanges. It's like people are choosing to counteract the rudeness that seems to be taking over. I know I started doing it because the world I want to live in is much friendlier than what we seem to be headed for. I think a lot of people have come to the same conclusion.
MineralMan
(146,298 posts)We need an epidemic of it in this country, I think, so infect as many people as you can.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Are you suggesting that the little pieces of etiquette that define good manners are outdated? Most of the examples you cite probably are outdated, but I must observe 50 others through the course of an average day that aren't. I take my hat off when I enter a building, hold the door for the person behind me, etc., etc. These little things are hardly inconvenient, and their aggregate effect is, imho, actually beneficial. They make us feel like we fit.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)They don't look where they are going and are very rude.
They yak on their cell phones while making a purchase at a retail store.
They don't look up and mow people down.
I was at the Houston Galleria last Sunday and the herds were quite thick.
The luxury goods stores (Chanel, Ferragamo, Hugo Boss, Vuitton, etc.) were rather deserted. Neiman-Marcus was fairly busy.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)... that's a start.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)Because if you lived in the 19th Century, life pretty much sucked.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)People then understood the different between the "private self" and the "public self".
In public, they were on their best behavior because they knew that, in society, each person plays a "role". In a very real sense, when you are in public, you are not nly your self, you are playing a social role in the collective.
So no, wearing "whatever you want" (because you need 24-7 self-expression?) at all times was out.
But politeness and good behavior was in.
It is still that way in Japan and I think it was good.