General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney sees 'jihadists' as possible global superpower
By Steve Benen
I'm not sure why CPAC invited Mitt Romney to speak this year. I'm also not sure why he agreed to participate.
There wasn't much to his address -- delivered, incidentally, from notes he read, instead of the teleprompter he relied on throughout 2012. "I'm sorry I won't be your president," Romney told the conservative audience. "I will be your coworker and I'll work shoulder by shoulder beside you."
Unless your job can be outsourced, at which point the former governor will stop being your coworker and start being the guy who laid you off.
There was one paragraph, however, that struck me as interesting.
"It's no secret that the last century was an American century, and it's no secret that over the span of the coming century, that is not written in the stars. America's pre-eminent position is not guaranteed. And the consequence if America were to become surpassed by another nation would be devastating. Why do I say that? It's because the other leading contenders for world leadership -- China, Russia, the jihadists -- not one of them accepts freedom as we understand it."
So, let me get this straight. The man who sought the nation's highest office for six years seriously believes "jihadists" will compete with the United States on the international stage? In Romney's vision, "jihadists" have the potential to become a global superpower, capable of "world leadership," on par with the U.S. of A.?
I realize the 2012 election wasn't decided on foreign policy or international affairs, but I've never understood Romney's strange view of the world.
- more -
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/03/15/17328635-romney-sees-jihadists-as-possible-global-superpower
They invited him because he just as insane as they are.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)I've always thought there couldn't possibly be a worse president than W, but I'm beginning to change my mind.
Initech
(100,068 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)Rand seems to be the hot ticket right now, but I don't expect him to be their guy next time.
Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #5)
Initech This message was self-deleted by its author.
Initech
(100,068 posts)The GOP seems to be a never ending train of stupidity these days. You had Rick Santorum, then Herman Cain, then Ron Paul, then Newt "Moon Colony" Gingrich (or Newt "High School Janitor" Gingrich ), the list goes on and on. Can't wait to see what the next election cycle brings. Todd Akin? Rand Paul? Ted Cruz? Sarah Palin? Or someone much worse?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)Jeb Bush will rear his big fat pumpkin head. I'm guessing we'll see Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio; and they need a black guy, so look for Alan West. I don't think Sarah Palin will be back, but maybe Michele Bachmann will take another shot at it. Tim Pawlenty will be making too much money as a lobbyist, so he's out. I bet Santorum will try again because the others aren't quite godly enough.
That's a pretty good crew for the clown car, but no doubt there will be some surprise participants.
Initech
(100,068 posts)Assuming the GOP isn't completely broken by then.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Oh, wait...he's serious.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Tikki
(14,557 posts)currently reside in the USA.
Tikki
sinkingfeeling
(51,454 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)I am so happy you are not my POTUS; the last thing this country needs is another uninformed idiot destroying the infrastructure out of greed and criminal behavior.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)magellan
(13,257 posts)Jihadists and our conservatives have a lot more in common than the likes of Romney would ever see.