Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo what if the most honest self-evaluation of the Republican Party concluded “We’re screwed!”
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_03/we_have_met_the_enemy_and_he_i043602.phpWe Have Met the Enemy And He Is Us
March 15, 2013 11:35 AM
By Ed Kilgore
So what if the most honest self-evaluation of the Republican Party concluded Were screwed!
Thats sorta the impression left by Matthew Continettis piece in the Weekly Standard entitled The Double Bind.
And the impact of his analysis, unless theres just a collective decision to ignore it, could be significant. He is not, after all, some tweedy RINO interested in high-fives from the MSM or the opposition; hes a stone partisan warrior (founder of the Washington Free Beacon and hagiographer of Sarah Palin) who would very much like to bring liberals weeping to their knees. Hes the sort of guy who would probably be quite happy if a one-party dictatorship could be established, or who may think the godless elites have already established one.
But hes not in denial when it comes to the political dilemmas facing the Republican Party, which he neatly summarizes in a few graphs:
Heres the problem. The domestic proposals that have the greatest chance of making the Republican party attractive to the coalition of the ascendantimmigrants, members of the millennial generation, single white womeninvolve far more government intervention in the economy than the GOP coalitionmarried white people, Wall Street, the Tea Partywill allow. And we havent even mentioned changing the GOP approach to social issues, which would drive the Republican base of religious conservatives out of the party. Pursuing such proposals would break the coalition that puts Republicans close to a majority.
On the other hand, sticking with the policies that glue this so-close-to-a-majority coalition together would foreclose the possibility of expanding the GOP vote. And it would limit the vote Republicans pull from disaffected voters who used to support the GOP but have turned away for various reasons.
Theres more. Trying to appeal to the coalition of the ascendant and the Reagan coalition simultaneously would give the party a severe case of political schizophrenia. The GOP would bewilder its historic base of support while disappointing newcomers, leading to confusion, disillusionment, apathy, and perhaps (ultimately) dissolution.
On the other hand, sticking with the policies that glue this so-close-to-a-majority coalition together would foreclose the possibility of expanding the GOP vote. And it would limit the vote Republicans pull from disaffected voters who used to support the GOP but have turned away for various reasons.
Theres more. Trying to appeal to the coalition of the ascendant and the Reagan coalition simultaneously would give the party a severe case of political schizophrenia. The GOP would bewilder its historic base of support while disappointing newcomers, leading to confusion, disillusionment, apathy, and perhaps (ultimately) dissolution.
snip//
Continetti closes by suggesting, as is common in pleas for significant political change, that it may take some exemplary leader like Reagan (ironically) to usher in the era of the conservative welfare state, and convince Republicans to abandon their illusions. The ritualistic invocation of RRs holy name in this particular cause may greatly offend his intended audience, since one of their chief illusions is that Reagan presided over a latter-day Coolidge Administration that was steering the nation towards prelapsarian innocence until the treacherous Bushes and the wily Clinton (not to mention the Kenyan socialist Obama) spoiled his legacy. But conservative denialists will have a harder time rebutting his argument that the path they are on currently leads straight to nowhere.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 791 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So what if the most honest self-evaluation of the Republican Party concluded “We’re screwed!” (Original Post)
babylonsister
Mar 2013
OP
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)1. The Man Sees The Trap He Is In, Ma'am
Kind of a shame, actually. The analysis is quite sound.
LVdem
(524 posts)2. I'd feel sorry for them...
If they weren't a bunch of dicks...
OK, no I wouldn't.
Ha.