Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 07:34 AM Mar 2013

Fail! The $400 Billion Military Jet That Can't Fly in Cloudy Weather

http://www.alternet.org/fail-400-billion-military-jet-cant-fly-cloudy-weather



According to one of its supporters, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is not "what our troops need," is "too costly" and "poorly managed," and its "present difficulties are too numerous to detail."

The F-35 is a case study of government failure at all levels - civilian and military, federal, state, local, even airport authority. Not one critical government agency is meeting its obligation to protect the people it presumably represents. Senator Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., who wrote the F-35 critique above, is hardly unique as an illustration of how government fails, but he sees no alternative to failure.

Up for re-election in 2014 and long a supporter of basing the F-35 in Vermont, Leahy put those thoughts in a letter to a constituent made public March 13. This is Leahy's most recent public communication since December 2012, when he refused to meet with opponents of the F-35 and his web site listed a page of "public discussion" events mostly from the spring, including private briefings with public officials, without responding to any substantive issues.

The F-35 is a nuclear-capable weapon of mass destruction that was supposed to be the "fighter of the future" when it was undertaken in 2001. Now, more than a decade overdue and more than 100% over budget, the plane is expected to cost $1.5 trillion over its useful life, of which about $400 billion has already been spent.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fail! The $400 Billion Military Jet That Can't Fly in Cloudy Weather (Original Post) xchrom Mar 2013 OP
Cancel now, save a trillion MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #1
but the Hill is getting old :-) madokie Mar 2013 #2
Please consider Ms. Warren in the primaries MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #4
My hope is they will join hands madokie Mar 2013 #6
All that money squandered? AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #3
Maybe if we tell him he can use the money to MannyGoldstein Mar 2013 #5
$33 billion a year for this broken toy so far magellan Mar 2013 #7
It's a cold war relec 20 years in development and the costliest plane in history. talkingmime Mar 2013 #8
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
1. Cancel now, save a trillion
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 07:39 AM
Mar 2013

We have drones. We have F16s. If things get really scary, we can send Hillary with a dagger.

What more do we need?

madokie

(51,076 posts)
2. but the Hill is getting old :-)
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 07:42 AM
Mar 2013

according to mitch baby that is
Oh I'll vote for her in '16 as sure as I'm sitting here on my ass now

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
4. Please consider Ms. Warren in the primaries
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 07:45 AM
Mar 2013

We need Hill to stay rested in case the F16s prove insufficient.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
3. All that money squandered?
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 07:43 AM
Mar 2013

And President Obama can't even go on national TV, or otherwise contact Congressional leaders, and demand that the F-35 program be shut down?

Of course not.

He can't even close Gitmo.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
5. Maybe if we tell him he can use the money to
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 07:47 AM
Mar 2013

build new prisons for pot smokers?

Other pot smokers, of course, not him.

(No, I'm not saying that our President is currently a pot smoker)

magellan

(13,257 posts)
7. $33 billion a year for this broken toy so far
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 07:58 AM
Mar 2013

On the bright side, that's a steal compared to the $220 billion a year we've footed to date for the boondoggle in Iraq.

Just another of the many worthless yet sacrosanct defense expenses we're expected to pay for while American children go hungry and seniors and the disabled are threatened with further cuts.

 

talkingmime

(2,173 posts)
8. It's a cold war relec 20 years in development and the costliest plane in history.
Mon Mar 18, 2013, 12:04 PM
Mar 2013

If Congress is serious about cutting spending, take the loss and dump the thing. It doesn't meet any current or foreseable need. All it is good for is funneling tax dollars into the pockets of the military industrial complex.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fail! The $400 Billion Mi...