Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,845 posts)
Tue Mar 19, 2013, 12:47 PM Mar 2013

Drug Testing for Congressmen: A modest proposal in response to an obnoxious one.

Source: Daily Beast



<snip>

In a statement, Fincher said, “It’s not unreasonable to ask folks to stay clean in order to receive federal assistance.” Fincher—who hails from Frog Jump, Tennessee, and is a self-styled fiscal conservative—says he just wants to bring a little Frog Jump common sense to Washington.

But the Environmental Working Group charges that the congressman, who is managing partner of Fincher Farms in West Tennessee, has received $3.2 million in federal farm subsidies over 10 years. Fincher has said that much of that total is in the form of loans, which he repays. Of course, receiving a federal loan is a benefit, even if it is repaid. But Fincher does acknowledge directly pocketing $50,000 to $75,000 a year in payments above and beyond the loans. The average recipient of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (a.k.a. welfare), by contrast, gets $392 per month. So Fincher, who boasts of being a successful agribusinessman, is by his own admission taking at least 10 times more federal money each year than the average impoverished American receives in welfare. (Fincher’s spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.)

Why not apply Fincher’s logic to Farmer Fincher? Lord knows farmers work their tails off. But so do lots of folks whose work is not federally subsidized. So if Farmer Fincher wants to bank thousands in cash and benefit from millions in loans, he ought to be willing to pee in a jar just like some poor single mother on TANF.

But why stop there? Let’s apply Fincher’s logic to all federal largesse. Drug-test Wall Street bankers who take billion-dollar bailouts, hedge-fund managers who exploit tax loopholes to pay a lower tax rate than their secretaries, defense contractors, radio talk-show hosts who broadcast on Armed Forces Networks.

<snip>

It is interesting—but not surprising—that when Congressman Fincher thinks of welfare recipients he doesn’t think of himself. And when he thinks about people who are high on drugs, his immediate stereotype is a welfare recipient, not a banker, radio talk-show host, or politician. Maybe instead of drug testing we need a hypocrisy test.


Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/03/18/paul-begala-should-we-drug-test-congressmen.html#.UUiQXazvbPY.reddit
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Drug Testing for Congress...