Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBelieve it or not, Senate passes spending bill
Believe it or not, Senate passes spending bill
by Joan McCarter
After spending weeks insisting that sequestration wouldn't hurt anyone, Senate Republicans were forced today to pass a spending bill that blunts at least some of the sequester cuts. After finally coming to an agreement to move the spending bill for 2013, it passed with a simple majority vote, 73-26.
In fact, the Senate voted on a number of Republican amendments, all from Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) to play politics with the sequester, like the one that would have shifted maintenance funding for National Parks and Monuments to the Secret Service to resume White House tours. It lost, 45-54.
The chamber did approve one amendment co-sponsored by Democrat Mark Pryor and Republican Roy Blunt to shift Agriculture funding to keep meat inspectors on the job, and another amendment proposed by Democrat Kay Hagan and Republican James Inhofe was approved that will reverse the military services plans to cut tuition assistance for service members.
That's in addition to the work done in the underlying bill to restore at least some of the funding cut by the sequester to the WIC food assistance program, to child care subsidies, and to embassy security and construction, among other programs, all of which Republican Richard Shelby, the ranking member on Appropriations, touted in his floor speech introducing the bill. Republicans might still insist that sequestration won't hurt anyone, but their work on this bill says otherwise.
The amendments offered were essentially the same amendments that both sides had agreed to vote on at the beginning of the week. This could have all been done on Monday, but for the futile obstruction of a few Republicans. Only the threat of losing their weekend before a long holiday recess seemed to be enough to break through the logjam.
Now it's back to the House, where, well, we'll see.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/20/1195613/-Believe-it-or-not-Senate-passes-spending-bill
by Joan McCarter
After spending weeks insisting that sequestration wouldn't hurt anyone, Senate Republicans were forced today to pass a spending bill that blunts at least some of the sequester cuts. After finally coming to an agreement to move the spending bill for 2013, it passed with a simple majority vote, 73-26.
In fact, the Senate voted on a number of Republican amendments, all from Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) to play politics with the sequester, like the one that would have shifted maintenance funding for National Parks and Monuments to the Secret Service to resume White House tours. It lost, 45-54.
The chamber did approve one amendment co-sponsored by Democrat Mark Pryor and Republican Roy Blunt to shift Agriculture funding to keep meat inspectors on the job, and another amendment proposed by Democrat Kay Hagan and Republican James Inhofe was approved that will reverse the military services plans to cut tuition assistance for service members.
That's in addition to the work done in the underlying bill to restore at least some of the funding cut by the sequester to the WIC food assistance program, to child care subsidies, and to embassy security and construction, among other programs, all of which Republican Richard Shelby, the ranking member on Appropriations, touted in his floor speech introducing the bill. Republicans might still insist that sequestration won't hurt anyone, but their work on this bill says otherwise.
The amendments offered were essentially the same amendments that both sides had agreed to vote on at the beginning of the week. This could have all been done on Monday, but for the futile obstruction of a few Republicans. Only the threat of losing their weekend before a long holiday recess seemed to be enough to break through the logjam.
Now it's back to the House, where, well, we'll see.
- more -
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/20/1195613/-Believe-it-or-not-Senate-passes-spending-bill
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 978 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Believe it or not, Senate passes spending bill (Original Post)
ProSense
Mar 2013
OP
demwing
(16,916 posts)1. 'passed with a simple majority vote, 73-26.''
Maybe I missed that memo, but isn't anything over 60 votes considered a super majority?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. No doubt, that was sarcasm. n/t
ProSense
(116,464 posts)3. Interesting
10 Republicans voted against cloture and for passage.
Roll call on cloture 63 - 36
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00043
Roll call on passage 73 - 26
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00044
Here are the 10:
Barrasso (R-WY)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Hatch (R-UT)
McConnell (R-KY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Wicker (R-MS)
Why would they vote to block the bill, and turn around minutes later and vote to pass it?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)4. Why are the Republicans obsessed with the White House tours?
It's a little baffling to me
ProSense
(116,464 posts)5. It's bizarre.
Maybe there is some pork in there for them or they're using tours as a fundraising tool.