Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 04:58 PM Mar 2013

Believe it or not, Senate passes spending bill

Believe it or not, Senate passes spending bill

by Joan McCarter

After spending weeks insisting that sequestration wouldn't hurt anyone, Senate Republicans were forced today to pass a spending bill that blunts at least some of the sequester cuts. After finally coming to an agreement to move the spending bill for 2013, it passed with a simple majority vote, 73-26.

In fact, the Senate voted on a number of Republican amendments, all from Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) to play politics with the sequester, like the one that would have shifted maintenance funding for National Parks and Monuments to the Secret Service to resume White House tours. It lost, 45-54.

The chamber did approve one amendment co-sponsored by Democrat Mark Pryor and Republican Roy Blunt to shift Agriculture funding to keep meat inspectors on the job, and another amendment proposed by Democrat Kay Hagan and Republican James Inhofe was approved that will reverse the military services’ plans to cut tuition assistance for service members.

That's in addition to the work done in the underlying bill to restore at least some of the funding cut by the sequester to the WIC food assistance program, to child care subsidies, and to embassy security and construction, among other programs, all of which Republican Richard Shelby, the ranking member on Appropriations, touted in his floor speech introducing the bill. Republicans might still insist that sequestration won't hurt anyone, but their work on this bill says otherwise.

The amendments offered were essentially the same amendments that both sides had agreed to vote on at the beginning of the week. This could have all been done on Monday, but for the futile obstruction of a few Republicans. Only the threat of losing their weekend before a long holiday recess seemed to be enough to break through the logjam.

Now it's back to the House, where, well, we'll see.

- more -

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/03/20/1195613/-Believe-it-or-not-Senate-passes-spending-bill



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Believe it or not, Senate passes spending bill (Original Post) ProSense Mar 2013 OP
'passed with a simple majority vote, 73-26.'' demwing Mar 2013 #1
No doubt, that was sarcasm. n/t ProSense Mar 2013 #2
Interesting ProSense Mar 2013 #3
Why are the Republicans obsessed with the White House tours? Cali_Democrat Mar 2013 #4
It's bizarre. ProSense Mar 2013 #5
 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
1. 'passed with a simple majority vote, 73-26.''
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 05:06 PM
Mar 2013

Maybe I missed that memo, but isn't anything over 60 votes considered a super majority?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. Interesting
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 05:34 PM
Mar 2013

10 Republicans voted against cloture and for passage.

Roll call on cloture 63 - 36
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00043

Roll call on passage 73 - 26
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=113&session=1&vote=00044

Here are the 10:

Barrasso (R-WY)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coats (R-IN)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Hatch (R-UT)
McConnell (R-KY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Wicker (R-MS)

Why would they vote to block the bill, and turn around minutes later and vote to pass it?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. It's bizarre.
Wed Mar 20, 2013, 06:24 PM
Mar 2013

Maybe there is some pork in there for them or they're using tours as a fundraising tool.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Believe it or not, Senate...