Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

msongs

(67,405 posts)
Fri May 3, 2013, 09:30 PM May 2013

AK Senator Begich to introduce an act to protect/preserve Social Security this coming Monday....

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/03/1206754/-AK-Sen-Mark-Begich-D-Will-Introduce-The-Protecting-Preserving-Social-Security-Act-On-Monday

According to the dKos article there are 3 main points in the legislation:

1) remove SS income cap
2) change the basis used to adjust increases for seniors

3)remove penalties on honest citizens who paid in big money to SS from jobs, then got a job with another retirement.

#3 is a big deal! If you worked SS jobs for 30 years and spent 10 years in a pension paying job your SS is cut by 75% for no other valid reason.
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AK Senator Begich to introduce an act to protect/preserve Social Security this coming Monday.... (Original Post) msongs May 2013 OP
I am liking it! rurallib May 2013 #1
K&R MotherPetrie May 2013 #2
#3 is really a big deal, several people I know has worked on jobs paying SS and also jobs with state Thinkingabout May 2013 #3
Hubby taught at community college for a couple of decades,after first being a programmer in business Hekate May 2013 #19
But if you do that you also get a partial pension, right? Recursion May 2013 #22
If you work on jobs for twenty years and pay FICA you are entitled to receive an amount of money Thinkingabout May 2013 #23
Add him to my list of favorable politicians. mick063 May 2013 #4
Your newest favorable politician... tarheelsunc May 2013 #11
For now, any Democrat that looks to strengthen Social Security is rare. mick063 May 2013 #18
"change the basis used to adjust increases for seniors" sounds like chained cpi. HiPointDem May 2013 #5
Yeah, #2 sounds like C-CPI DJ13 May 2013 #6
if so, the begich plan is to tax more, spend less, build the SS surplus even bigger & borrow more! HiPointDem May 2013 #8
It's the cpi-e!!!!! Nite Owl May 2013 #9
An alternative that revises CPI upwards? Awesome. They'll be sorry they ever mentioned chained CPI. reformist2 May 2013 #10
That would be a winner! DJ13 May 2013 #12
Why does this story tell me that some people are starting to feel the pressure? tech3149 May 2013 #7
Great start libdude May 2013 #13
K & R AzDar May 2013 #14
Filibuster time Iliyah May 2013 #15
Protecting and Preserving Social Security Act and the Social Security Fairness Act of 2013: freshwest May 2013 #16
item 3 is a fact. got it right from the mouth of the SS office director when he docked my SS nt msongs May 2013 #17
See upthread -- same thing with my husband. Hekate May 2013 #20
He has to do something to redeem himself Blue_In_AK May 2013 #21
^ Wilms May 2013 #24
OK, that's a good thing... truebluegreen May 2013 #25

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
3. #3 is really a big deal, several people I know has worked on jobs paying SS and also jobs with state
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:04 PM
May 2013

And school systems and are penalized for doing so. They qualify for SS and this is figured on the number of years paid into the system but large amounts are taken away simply because they have worked in places which has their own retirements and did not pay into FICA those years.

Hekate

(90,683 posts)
19. Hubby taught at community college for a couple of decades,after first being a programmer in business
Sat May 4, 2013, 02:42 AM
May 2013

He retired from teaching last year, and he knew his SS was going to be downgraded because the public school system has its own retirement pension plan. He actually went back into the industry, and aside from enjoying the work, he takes satisfaction in knowing that he is gradually building his SS pension back up.

It is weird, isn't it?

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
23. If you work on jobs for twenty years and pay FICA you are entitled to receive an amount of money
Sat May 4, 2013, 09:19 AM
May 2013

determined by the amount of money you earned during those 20 years. If you then or previously go to work for schools or state agencies which does not pay FICA then when you start to draw your SSI they take away a portion of your SSI, sometimes 1/3 but if you had not worked in jobs which did not pay FICA then you get the full amount. It is like a penalty for having taken a job without paying FICA.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
4. Add him to my list of favorable politicians.
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:06 PM
May 2013

Elizabeth Warren, Alan Grayson, Bernie Sanders, Sherrod Brown, and now.......Mark Begich.


We need to keep this running list current and up to date.

Edit: Now that it looks like CPI might be involved, belay that last order!

tarheelsunc

(2,117 posts)
11. Your newest favorable politician...
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:39 PM
May 2013

opposes universal background checks, supports ANWR drilling, and prides himself as an "independent" on his official website.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
18. For now, any Democrat that looks to strengthen Social Security is rare.
Sat May 4, 2013, 12:28 AM
May 2013

Not that I am a single issue voter, but SS is near the top of my list. When a politician comes out in favor of strengthening the safety net, I take notice.

The points you made are noted. I posted before taking a closer look.

With respect to "my newest favorable politician", you failed to read my edit, but I won't hold it against you.

We are on the same side of your fore mentioned issues.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
5. "change the basis used to adjust increases for seniors" sounds like chained cpi.
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:06 PM
May 2013

on edit: *supposedly* it's cpi-e, an experimental cpi specific to spending of the elderly.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/18/1202889/-Sen-Mark-Begich-Both-Courageous-Hero-and-Cowardly-Devil

my reservations with *any* changes in SS still stand. why the rush to change *anything* when SS is forecast to be able to pay out 100% until 2033? we can easily wait 15 years, by which time the entire landscape may have changed.


#3 is a big deal! If you worked SS jobs for 30 years and spent 10 years in a pension paying job your SS is cut by 75% for no other valid reason.

i believe you're misrepresenting what actually happens here.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
6. Yeah, #2 sounds like C-CPI
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:11 PM
May 2013

If it was an increase it seems it would be described as such in glowing terms.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
8. if so, the begich plan is to tax more, spend less, build the SS surplus even bigger & borrow more!
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:12 PM
May 2013

Nite Owl

(11,303 posts)
9. It's the cpi-e!!!!!
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:29 PM
May 2013

Fron the Daily Kos article:

"The second part of that bill would revise how SS payments are adjusted to better reflect how America’s senior spend their income. Currently, payments are based on a Consumer Price Index model that does not accurately reflect higher costs seniors pay, for medications, for example. The bill would create a CPI – E for elders."



Yeah!!!!

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
12. That would be a winner!
Fri May 3, 2013, 11:06 PM
May 2013

Of course, the cons (both party's) wont want it since it wouldnt free up money to funnel to the 1%, but its a start.

Thank you for the explanation!

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
7. Why does this story tell me that some people are starting to feel the pressure?
Fri May 3, 2013, 10:11 PM
May 2013

It might just be an "If you want to keep your job you've got to give them something" situation. For myself and most I know all three of those reasons are best possible choices.
It's not an issue of don't take what I paid for so much as can't we find a way to take care of someone when absolutely everything in their life has gone wrong.

libdude

(136 posts)
13. Great start
Fri May 3, 2013, 11:44 PM
May 2013

Sounds like a great start to preserve/ protect and begin to really take Social Security into a true retirement system for every participant.
The CPI-e which would focus on those spending areas that seniors primarily use.
I worked for ten years in jobs covered by FICA, I worked in civil service for almost three decades, I worked a part time job for twenty years during my civil service career. When I turned 62 and began receiving Social Security, because of my civil service pension, my SS was cut by about 49%, and will remain cut at that level.
This is called WEP, windfall elimination provision, this will affect my spouse when she recieves my SS, which will be again cut in half, this is called GPO, government pension offest.
I only mention this for those that have not retired and might find themselves in the same situation.
I really scratch my head in thinking that a civil service pension is some kind of profit windfall.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
15. Filibuster time
Fri May 3, 2013, 11:51 PM
May 2013

thats all the GOP are good for. Anywho, trying to make up for the non gun control stuff? Anyways, I still don't trust him.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
16. Protecting and Preserving Social Security Act and the Social Security Fairness Act of 2013:
Sat May 4, 2013, 12:03 AM
May 2013


More about part 2 from the link:

The second part of that bill would revise how SS payments are adjusted to better reflect how America’s senior spend their income. Currently, payments are based on a Consumer Price Index model that does not accurately reflect higher costs seniors pay, for medications, for example. The bill would create a CPI – E for elders.

Increases Benefits for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities.

Currently, Social Security benefits are adjusted by the Consumer Price Index for workers. However, costs and spending patterns for seniors do not mirror those of the workforce. That is why Sen. Begich’s bill calls for adjusting cost-of-living increases with a Consumer Price Index specifically for the elderly which was created to more accurately measure the costs of goods and services seniors actually buy.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/03/1206754/-AK-Sen-Mark-Begich-D-Will-Introduce-The-Protecting-Preserving-Social-Security-Act-On-Monday

Not sure about first paragraph, but the second is exactly what people getting COLA have said for years. Spending habits are vastly different than those in the work force, and predicating the index on that measure was not geared for those on SS, etc.

This is much like what Begich suggested last year. I'll be calling my representatives about this, since it is a specific proposal and not media spin. All members of Congress need to be called, Senate and HoR, to let them know in line with the faulty 'austerity' tables, we expect better from them.

Thanks for posting, will be sharing.


Hekate

(90,683 posts)
20. See upthread -- same thing with my husband.
Sat May 4, 2013, 02:44 AM
May 2013

The only difference is that although he is 66 he does not want to retire yet, so he's back doing what he did before he started teaching: computer programming, and coincidentally rebuilding his SS account.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AK Senator Begich to intr...