Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,986 posts)
Sun May 5, 2013, 11:33 AM May 2013

"irreparable damages to revenues/growth prospects of utilities?" I may fuckin' cry; but probably not

Duke Energy CEO Jim Rogers said, 'If the cost of solar panels keeps coming down, installation costs come down and if they combine solar with battery technology and a power management system, then we have someone just using (the grid) for backup.' What happens if a whole bunch of customers start generating their own power and using the grid merely as backup? The EEI report warns of 'irreparable damages to revenues and growth prospects' of utilities.

http://grist.org/climate-energy/solar-panels-could-destroy-u-s-utilities-according-to-u-s-utilities/
http://avedoncarol.blogspot.com/2013/05/i-think-youll-understand.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"irreparable damages to revenues/growth prospects of utilities?" I may fuckin' cry; but probably not (Original Post) kpete May 2013 OP
The 'backup' grid will then become very, very expensive to use... Ruby the Liberal May 2013 #1
Yeah dude, Turbineguy May 2013 #2
Oh, Boo Hoo! supernova May 2013 #3
Help the Solar industry, Damage Electitic Utlitlies Buy Solar Stocks Katashi_itto May 2013 #4
I bet the kerosene lamp people were upset with the light bulb too. hobbit709 May 2013 #5
But if solar users are dependent upon the grid Yo_Mama May 2013 #6
horse carriage maker decries newfangled "automobile" elehhhhna May 2013 #7
Public utilities should be publicly owned. MineralMan May 2013 #8
screw duke energy onethatcares May 2013 #9
Seen Europe lately? Half-Century Man May 2013 #10
GOOD! silverweb May 2013 #11
That is the same reason WHY we do't have a Publicly Owned National Health Insurance Program... bvar22 May 2013 #12

supernova

(39,345 posts)
3. Oh, Boo Hoo!
Sun May 5, 2013, 11:37 AM
May 2013

Someone call him a Whaaaaambulance!



I intend in the next five years or so to go solar. Duke Energy can suck it!

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
4. Help the Solar industry, Damage Electitic Utlitlies Buy Solar Stocks
Sun May 5, 2013, 11:40 AM
May 2013

Why Solar Capital Is a Top 10 Financial Stock With 10.15% Yield

Solar Capital Limited (NASD: SLRC) has been named as a Top 10 dividend-paying financial stock, according to Dividend Channel, which published its most recent ”DividendRank” report. The report noted that among shares of financial companies, SLRC displayed both attractive valuation metrics and strong profitability metrics. For example, the recent SLRC share price of $23.66 represents a price-to-book ratio of 1.0 and an annual dividend yield of 10.15% — by comparison, the average stock in Dividend Channel’s coverage universe yields 3.8% and trades at a price-to-book ratio of 2.1. The report also cited the strong quarterly dividend history at Solar Capital Limited, and favorable long-term multi-year growth rates in key fundamental data point



http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
6. But if solar users are dependent upon the grid
Sun May 5, 2013, 11:49 AM
May 2013

they will need to pay for it.

These are required disclosures, and attempts to frame this as some sort of vast utility conspiracy are completely clueless.

Anybody using grid-tied solar is in fact highly dependent on the grid to keep their electricity on. If laws are structured so they do not pay for that resource, then everyone else is going to be paying a continually increasing rate (because they are paying their share of the costs plus the cost for service to the grid-tied customers), which will increase solar installations.

The only real issue is that as we go to more solar installations, we will have to have a new way of allocating grid costs to customers. Big deal.

onethatcares

(16,167 posts)
9. screw duke energy
Sun May 5, 2013, 12:53 PM
May 2013

they just became our monopoly of no choice here in west coast Floriduh. Their prior buddies that they bought out have been charging we rate payers for a nuke plant that will never be built along with a botched repair job on their current POS crystal river plant. And......
.................................................they decided they didn't have to pay their fair share of taxes to Levy county giving those folks a great big bendover when it comes to the schools and infrastructure there.

Here we are in the "SUNSHINE" state and we can't get a break on solar.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
10. Seen Europe lately?
Sun May 5, 2013, 01:05 PM
May 2013

The landscape is dotted with millions of solar panels and wind turbines on homes. South America, Africa and Asia have large numbers of passive household energy generation devices. Have to wonder why a phenomenon so prevalent globally, is conspicuous in it's absence here.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
11. GOOD!
Sun May 5, 2013, 04:03 PM
May 2013

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]It's well past time corporate profits started taking the brunt.

So get honest and do what you and your ilk tell the ordinary people of the world: Adapt or die.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
12. That is the same reason WHY we do't have a Publicly Owned National Health Insurance Program...
Sun May 5, 2013, 04:05 PM
May 2013

... because THAT would do "irreparable damages" to the For Profit Health Insurance Industry.

Our government works FOR the 1%.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"irreparable damages to r...