Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Sun May 5, 2013, 07:22 PM May 2013

Syrian Rebel Leader: We Won't Share U.S. Arms With Extremists

Originally published on Sun May 5, 2013 9:01 am

The Obama administration says it's considering providing arms to rebels fighting to bring down Syrian President Bashar Assad if the U.S. can confirm his forces did in fact use the debilitating nerve gas sarin in recent attacks. Coupled with news that Israel reportedly launched an airstrike at a target in Syria to prevent a shipment of missiles from reaching Hezbollah, these events could represent a game changer in the conflict-ravaged nation.

The 'Moderate' Opposition

The so-called Free Syrian Army is not a traditional army, but instead made up of many small battalions and brigades that have come together to fight Assad's regime. According to Brig. Gen. Salim Idris, the rebel group's chief of staff, it doesn't operate like a traditional fighting force.

"I don't like to say that we are working just like a regular army because the majority of the forces are civilians," Idris tells NPR's Kelly McEvers.

Idris would likely manage any military assistance the U.S. decides to provide. The U.S. and its allies believe he represents the so-called "moderate" fighters — those who want to topple the president and install a democratic government.

A senior Obama administration official told NPR the weapons the U.S. would most likely provide are shoulder-fired missiles, which could take down aircraft. That would be a good start, Idris says, but it would not be enough.

MORE...

http://www.krwg.org/post/syrian-rebel-leader-we-wont-share-us-arms-extremists

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
1. Yeah, right.
Sun May 5, 2013, 07:36 PM
May 2013

We should stay out of this completely. It's not our business and the country is just going to go full on psycho. No thanks.

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
2. I totally agree with you. How do we know they won't. Wouldn't be surprised...
Sun May 5, 2013, 08:03 PM
May 2013

if they extremist joined the rebels.the rebels will give them arms.


Extremist: "We want to join your fight"
Syrian rebel: " Great..we can use the help"
Extremist: "Can we use your arms?"
Syrian rebel: " Sorry you can't. the U.S. said this is just for us rebels"
Extremist: "Oh ok.


Riiiiiiiight

pampango

(24,692 posts)
3. Certainly every Muslim (or every Sunni Muslim) in Syria is not a terrorist but providing arms is
Sun May 5, 2013, 08:50 PM
May 2013

more complicated than that. Providing weapons will not end well.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. Brilliant! Another civil war to get bogged down in with our "help". See Vietnam for precedent.
Sun May 5, 2013, 08:56 PM
May 2013

Not to mention our glorious (and losing) efforts in Afghanistan.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Syrian Rebel Leader: We W...