General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEver get the feeling you're watching an over-speed flywheel coming apart?
At first small pieces break off the perimeter and they almost balance each other. But the wobble produces cracks and once the first big piece flies off, the whole thing breaks apart quickly and violently.
Our over-populated, over-industrialized planet is starting to look like that to me.
Perhaps hitting the brakes and slowing down the flywheel for repair should be considered.
madokie
(51,076 posts)htuttle
(23,738 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)And those eager to bring about the second coming?
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)And those Windmills and Solar Panels will NOT support an oil-equivalent lifestyle.
Profound cultural change is desperately needed.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Just pointing out many are sadly looking forward to the end....
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Some sick percentage of Christians believe a Second Coming is near.
Change is hard. Giving up and surrendering to Fate (or a God) is easy.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)including the very first ones, has had those that strongly believed that the second coming would happen in their lifetime.
I guess when your life revolves around an outlook that life on earth is hell and that heaven can be achieved if you suffer enough in this world (and make others suffer with you), it sounds pretty good.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)Belief that the "Second Coming" of Jesus is nigh may be stemming climate change action, according to a study published in the Political Science Quarterly.
The research, conducted by David C. Barker of the University of Pittsburgh and David H. Bearce of the University of Colorado, examined data from the 2007 Cooperative Congressional Election Study to discover that belief in the "end times" reduced a persons probability of strongly supporting government action on climate change by 12 percent when controlling for demographic and cultural factors.
Furthermore, when the effects of party affiliation, political ideology and media distrust were removed, this number increased by almost 20 percent.
It stands to reason that most nonbelievers would support preserving the Earth for future generations, but that end-times believers would rationally perceive such efforts to be ultimately futile, and hence ill-advised, Barker and Bears said, according to the Raw Story. . . .
That is, because of institutions such as the Electoral College, the winner-take-all representation mechanism, and the Senate filibuster, as well as geographic distribution of partisanship to modern partisan polarization, minority interests often successfully block majority preferences, they wrote. Thus, even if median voter supports policies designed to slow global warming, legislation to effect such change could find itself dead on arrival if the media Republican voter strongly resists public policy environmentalism at least in part because of end-times beliefs.
...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2798439
reformist2
(9,841 posts)I actually don't think there are too many people. There's more than enough food and shelter. The problem is a stupid and outdated economic system that is unable to distribute these necessities to the people.
kentuck
(111,092 posts)Good analogy!
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)newfie11
(8,159 posts)Kablooie
(18,634 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)and try to eat more produce and less processed food, and live small, and blah blah blah.
It's just hard when almost everyone around me is hyperconsuming their lives away.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)The Pacific full of radiation? Well, I guess that's ok, but I will make sure that if something worse happens it will not be ok. Then something worse happens, and well it's ok I guess...
The planet has only so many things left.