General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat do the republicans hope to accomplish with Benghazi?
I think that's pretty clear. They hope that it catches on with the American public and damages the current administration, but even more importantly they hope to cripple Hillary Clinton politically; making a presidential run not viable.
For a long time, repukes were more trusted by the American public on foreign policy. Then came bushco. They desperately want that back.
The more I read about Benghazi, the clearer it is that there's no there there, but republicans with their endless hearings by multiple committees hope that the issue is just too confusing form Americans and that they can distill it into Benghazi bad democrats bad their fault dead Americans.
So far, it's not working, but they are managing to keep it alive.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Quemoy and Matsu!
Quemoy and Matsu!
Archae
(46,327 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matsu_Islands
The phrase "Quemoy and Matsu" became part of U.S. political language in the 1960 U.S. presidential election. During the debates, both candidates, Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy, pledged to use U.S. forces if necessary to protect Taiwan from invasion by China, the mainland, which the U.S. did not at that time recognize as a legitimate government. But the two candidates had different opinions about whether to use U.S. forces to protect the ROC's forward positions, Quemoy and Matsu, as well.
-----
But, yes, a pivotal issue in 1960, now reduced to "what are those?"
Archae
(46,327 posts)I was less than a year old, and by the time I actually could know more about politics, Watergate hit.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)They want to smear Hillary with whatever they can pre 2016 so she will not be electable.
Wouldn't it be terrible to have that much collective hate for someone that you are willing to bring down a nation?
Kber
(5,043 posts)If they could rule over the ashes.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They better shut up. She made them all look so very stupid last time they tried demanding answers.
I'm sure she will be in top form later if she runs.
They will look stupid again. And again. And again. Forever.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The republicans know this. But they keep repeating "Bengazi, Bengazi" in the hopes their low information voters will assume there must be something there. Its swift-boating, part deaux.
Populist_Prole
(5,364 posts)It won't last, and so they'll have to come up with another cause du-jour every so often till the 2016 elections. Gotta keep drunken angry self righteous rubes angry and drunk, lest they lose fire in their belly and think things through rationally.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)MiniMe
(21,714 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)President and gotten more mileage out of it but again the GOP could not see the forest for the trees. I doubt they are going to find out much more than they should have learned if they cared to attend the briefing but then they would have lost footage in trying to prove something which did not happen.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)They want to embarrass Hillary. But not so much that she decides not to run, they want something that they can make an issue of in the campaign. And if she gets elected, something they can continue to use throughout her presidency just like the birther nonsense.
If we choose another candidate who can't plausibly be connected to Benghazi, they'll literally have nothing except a bunch of shit unpopular policies.
PD Turk
(1,289 posts)...it is a tale,told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
signifying nothing......
I'm predicting they will strut and fret for their hour upon the stage, and it's starting to look like their hour is almost up.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)It also takes attention away from the modest upticks in the economy lately that destroy their austerity agenda.
The usual kabuki theater of the absurd.
cali
(114,904 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)That's why someone leaked the rough drafts to ABC.
I still don't see how this damages her, but maybe some do:
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Benghazi%20Talking%20Points%20Timeline.pdf
Ganja Ninja
(15,953 posts)Focus the public on a fake story so they control the subject of national discourse. Smear the Democrats by innuendo and gin up public anger with partisan hearings and fake displays of outrage and indignation. It's all designed to trigger a monkey see monkey do response in their less than intelligent followers. That way they won't have to face scrutiny of themselves and their piss poor job performance.