Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn old but relevant editorial from the NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/opinion/20tue1.html?ex=1292734800&en=825d9a85592d751f&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss<snip>
But none of these phony choices were as absurd as the one Mr. Bush posed to justify his secret program of spying on Americans: save lives or follow the law.
Mr. Bush said he thwarted terrorist plots by allowing the National Security Agency to monitor Americans' international communications without a warrant. We don't know if that is true because the administration reverts to top-secret mode when pressed for details. But we can reach a conclusion about Mr. Bush's assertion that obeying a 27-year-old law prevents swift and decisive action in a high-tech era. It's a myth.
<snip>
Mr. Bush and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales offered a whole bag of logical pretzels yesterday to justify flouting this law. Most bizarre was the assertion that Congress authorized the surveillance of American citizens when it approved the use of "all necessary and appropriate force" by the United States military to punish those responsible for the 9/11 attacks or who aided or harbored the terrorists. This came as a surprise to lawmakers, who thought they were voting for the invasion of Afghanistan and the capture of Osama bin Laden.
<snip>
Chillingly, this is not the only time we've heard of this administration using terrorism as an excuse to spy on Americans. NBC News recently discovered a Pentagon database of 1,500 "suspicious incidents" that included a Quaker meeting to plan an antiwar rally. And Eric Lichtblau writes in today's Times that F.B.I. counterterrorism squads have conducted numerous surveillance operations since Sept. 11, 2001, on groups like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Greenpeace and the Catholic Workers group.
Mr. Bush says Congress gave him the power to spy on Americans. Fine, then Congress can just take it back.
....more
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 664 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An old but relevant editorial from the NY Times (Original Post)
kentuck
May 2013
OP
And today, with a Democratic President, we have no reason to think domestic surveillnce has ceased
1-Old-Man
May 2013
#1
I believe the NSA aspect was exposed by Thomas Tamm, a DOJ lawyer/whistleblower...
Smarmie Doofus
May 2013
#2
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)1. And today, with a Democratic President, we have no reason to think domestic surveillnce has ceased
and of course indefinite detention does not end with Democratic President either.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)2. I believe the NSA aspect was exposed by Thomas Tamm, a DOJ lawyer/whistleblower...
... warrantless wiretaps....who then was investigated , arrested, and hounded out of gov't.
Bradley Manning-haters are you paying attention?
K and R