Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
Wed May 15, 2013, 10:43 AM May 2013

Major story the media is ignoring today.

Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

CAIRO — In the month before attackers stormed U.S. facilities in Benghazi and killed four Americans, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens twice turned down offers of security assistance made by the senior U.S. military official in the region in response to concerns that Stevens had raised in a still secret memorandum, two government officials told McClatchy.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/14/191235/amb-stevens-twice-said-no-to-military.html
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Major story the media is ignoring today. (Original Post) One of the 99 May 2013 OP
This does not fit with the narrative of the President being to blame-NT Anansi1171 May 2013 #1
Not funding security in Libya is the scandal Life Long Dem May 2013 #2
Which has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with OFFERS of assistance. TheMadMonk May 2013 #3
 

Life Long Dem

(8,582 posts)
2. Not funding security in Libya is the scandal
Wed May 15, 2013, 11:22 AM
May 2013
"One person familiar with the events said Stevens might have rejected the offers because there was an understanding within the State Department that officials in Libya ought not to request more security, in part because of concerns about the political fallout of seeking a larger military presence in a country that was still being touted as a foreign policy success.

The embassy was told through back channels to not make direct requests for security,” an official familiar with the case, who agreed to discuss the case only anonymously because of the sensitivity of the subject, told McClatchy."


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/14/191235/amb-stevens-twice-said-no-to-military.html#storylink=cpy
 

TheMadMonk

(6,187 posts)
3. Which has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with OFFERS of assistance.
Wed May 15, 2013, 12:32 PM
May 2013

The problem is not lack of funding. The problem is the bloody USA's constant interference in foreign affairs for the best part of the last century.

Lack of funding my arse. Defending democracy? What a fucking joke. Your country spends hundreds of billions every year on either destabilising other nations, or defending against those you've already fucked over to the point where actual patriots freely spend the only currency left to them. THEIR OWN LIVES!

Your self proclaimed "moral high ground" lies atop mountain made up of 20-30 million bodies piled up since the conclusion of WWII. 6,000 - 10,000 9/11's inflicted, directly and indirectly, by America upon the peoples of SE Asia, South America and the Carribean, Indonesia, Africa, and the Middle East.

And all for what? To save suppurating pustules on the buttocks of humanity like Dick Cheney, the Walton family, and the Koch brothers from the "horror" of having to pay fair market value for the resources which fuel their empires.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Major story the media is ...