General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIRS Fallout: The REAL SCANDAL: SECRET MONEY Influencing US Elections
Published on Tuesday, May 14, 2013 by The Nation
IRS Fallout: The Real Scandal Is Secret Money Influencing US Elections
by Ari Berman
501c4 social welfare groups like Karl Roves Crossroads GPS, the Koch brothers Americans for Prosperity and Grover Norquists Americans for Tax Reformwhich dont have to disclose their donorsspent more than $250 million during the last election. Of outside spending reported to the FEC, 31 percent was secret spending, coming from organizations that are not required to disclose the original sources of their funds, writes Demos. Further analysis shows that dark money groups accounted for 58 percent of funds spent by outside groups on presidential television ads [$328 million in total].
IRS guidelines for 501c4 groups state that the promotion of social welfare does not include direct or indirect participation or intervention in political campaigns on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for public office
a section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization may engage in some political activities, so long as that is not its primary activity. Its ludicrous for groups like Crossroads GPSwhich spent at least $70 million during the last electionto claim that its primary purpose is not political activity. Only the likes of Karl Rove would believe that running attack ads against President Obama qualifies as social welfare.
So what did the IRS do about this blatant abuse of the tax code by some of the countrys top corporations and richest individuals? Virtually nothing. When it comes to political spending, the IRS is more like a toothless tiger, wrote Ken Vogel and Tarini Parti last year in a story headlined, The IRSs feeble grip on big political cash.
Its obvious that our Wild West campaign-finance system needs more, not less, scrutiny and much tighter, not looser, regulation. Yet conservative groups are exploiting the IRS scandal to further dilute regulatory agencies that are already on life support. Writes Andy Kroll of Mother Jones:
The Roves of the world would like nothing more than for the public to believe that conservative groups had too few opportunities to influence the 2012 election and were wrongly persecuted by evil Washington bureaucrats. Yet the 2012 election should have taught us precisely the opposite lessonthat our patchwork regulatory system is far from equipped to deal with the new Gilded Age unleashed by Citizens United. As Rep. Keith Ellison told Hayes last night: We need to redouble our efforts to bring real campaign-finance reform forward.
MORE AT:http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/05/14-12
Published on Tuesday, May 14, 2013 by The Nation
Little Star
(17,055 posts)and then there is this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022851430
atreides1
(16,076 posts)...of what "social welfare" means.
Maybe they might want to tighten those rules just a little...along with an more accurate definiton of what social welfare is really suppose to be!