Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublican accidentally debunks GOP narrative at IRS hearing
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/05/18/republican-accidentally-debunks-gop-narrative-at-irs-hearing/During a congressional hearing regarding the IRS on Friday, Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) inadvertently led the head of the IRS to contradict the notion that conservative nonprofits were singled out for scrutiny.
At the hearing, outgoing acting IRS commissioner Steve Miller repeatedly objected to the use of the word targeting. He said the so-called be on the lookout (BOLO) list was an inappropriate organizational tool or shortcut that IRS staff used to find potential political cases. Miller claimed the tea party groups would have be subjected to extra scrutiny regardless of the BOLO list.
If the targeting wasnt targeting, if the targeting wasnt based on philosophy, how come only conservatives got snagged? Roskam confidently asked.
They didnt, sir, Miller responded. Organizations of all walks and all persuasions were pulled in. Thats shown by the fact that only 70 of the 300 organizations were tea party organizations, of the ones that were looked at by TIGTA [Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration].
At the hearing, outgoing acting IRS commissioner Steve Miller repeatedly objected to the use of the word targeting. He said the so-called be on the lookout (BOLO) list was an inappropriate organizational tool or shortcut that IRS staff used to find potential political cases. Miller claimed the tea party groups would have be subjected to extra scrutiny regardless of the BOLO list.
If the targeting wasnt targeting, if the targeting wasnt based on philosophy, how come only conservatives got snagged? Roskam confidently asked.
They didnt, sir, Miller responded. Organizations of all walks and all persuasions were pulled in. Thats shown by the fact that only 70 of the 300 organizations were tea party organizations, of the ones that were looked at by TIGTA [Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration].
umm....oopsies!
edit: There's a link to the PDF of Inspector General report in the article...on Page 8 of that report is a graph showing 96 of 298 were tea party-related (either "tea party" or "patriot" or "9/12" . That's LESS than 1/3 of all applications receiving "special" review.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1374 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Republican accidentally debunks GOP narrative at IRS hearing (Original Post)
Roland99
May 2013
OP
Flashmann
(2,140 posts)1. Those damn,pesky accidental truths again
librechik
(30,674 posts)2. whoop! there it is!
Rex
(65,616 posts)3. RU ROH!!!!
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
WillyT
(72,631 posts)4. LOL !!! - Perfect !!!
siligut
(12,272 posts)5. Their big fuss is good reason to scrutinize them further
And scrutinize every single member too. I like to dream a little.
TheGunslinger
(1,086 posts)6. They're overscandalizing and wearing out the populace
hope it backfires on them in 2014!