Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Wed May 22, 2013, 09:57 PM May 2013

FDA bans 'waterproof' label on sunscreens

PHOENIX -- Just in time for the first unofficial summer holiday weekend, the Federal Drug Administration has issued new requirements to help make sun-protection products more effective and less misleading.

The FDA has banned terms like 'waterproof' on sunscreen labels and Valley dermatologist James Pehoushek said there never has been a truly waterproof sunscreen.

"We always tell our patients to reapply sunscreen every two hours. This is especially true in the case of children playing in the pool. A lot of people think the water actually protects them from the sun when in truth the water magnifies sunrays," Pehoushek said.

Pehoushek said make sure any sunblock has an SPF rating of 50 plus and is labeled 'broad spectrum.' That will block about 97 percent of the sun's rays.

http://ktar.com/22/1635911/FDA-bans-waterproof-label-on-sunscreens

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FDA bans 'waterproof' label on sunscreens (Original Post) The Straight Story May 2013 OP
SPF 50? FirstLight May 2013 #1
Need the rays??? HERVEPA May 2013 #2
actually yes... FirstLight May 2013 #4
Sorry for your condition. Take care. HERVEPA May 2013 #5
I use SPF 50. tammywammy May 2013 #3
I have seen SPF 75, but genreally use 35 myself. hollysmom May 2013 #6

FirstLight

(13,360 posts)
1. SPF 50?
Wed May 22, 2013, 10:09 PM
May 2013

geez, it's amazing to me how we have gotten so used to our environment or atmosphere changing... I remember using baby oil and SPF 2. Last summer I had a terrible time finding something below 30..
I use the 30+ stuff on my kids to be safe, but personally I need the rays on my skin.

FirstLight

(13,360 posts)
4. actually yes...
Wed May 22, 2013, 10:33 PM
May 2013

I have psoriatic arthritis, and the UV rays actually are good for it. During winter my doc tells me to do tanning occasionally to help with flareups. I take care not to burn or blister, and when in the sun for extended periods I wear higher protection or use shade... but the sun is good for us in relatively normal doses

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
3. I use SPF 50.
Wed May 22, 2013, 10:33 PM
May 2013

No need to go higher. I prefer to do as much as possible to prevent skin cancer.

You only need 15 min of the "rays" for vitamin D, otherwise you're just tanning yourself to skin cancer.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
6. I have seen SPF 75, but genreally use 35 myself.
Wed May 22, 2013, 11:04 PM
May 2013

I use ones labeled as water resistant, no such thing as water proof - haven't see that labeled for years.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FDA bans 'waterproof' lab...