General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe problem is that 90% of us are getting cucumbers.
Even capuchin monkeys know when they are being treated unfairly -and you can bet that this also sours relations between the two monkeys.
Want to create social discord and sow bad relations and lack of trust between group members? Treat them unfairly.
In a nutshell, this is what is behind most of the crimes in modern society and, in particular, in the US with its growing unfairness.
Just. Watch.
For the full De Wall TED Talk on morality in animals, here is the link.
http://www.ted.com/talks/frans_de_waal_do_animals_have_morals.html
PS De Waal is one of the greatest Bonobo scholars.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)ie: a sense of right and wrong? fairness?
curious.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)It has been demonstrated scientifically.
If you are interested, watch the TED talk.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)i just completely disagree with the presenter.
an individual trying to get ahead is... merely trying to get ahead and place itself in a winning DNA replication position. no right or wrong without a highly developed prefrontal cortex. just is.
i encourage people to watch Stanfords Robert Sapolsky on youtube. brilliant man, and not much woo. resources are a zero sum game.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)LOL, he is perhaps one of the most respected scientists and scholars in the study of primate behavior.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)why would the monkey share when there was nothing compelling him to in the first experiment?
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)about primate altruism.
Do you have some link where Sapolsky argues against these concepts of morality in primates?
BTW, I did read Sapolsky's account of his life with baboons. It was interesting but a bit short on scientific analysis and long on cult of personality if I recall.
Systematic Chaos
(8,601 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)I would argue against the analogy, however, because the cucumber was perfectly acceptable until the grape appeared.
My sense is that 90% have less than a cucumber, 9% have cucumber, the rest have an increasing number of grapes.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Fairness, of course, only has meaning by comparing our situation with others. If the choice is cucumber or nothing, we choose cucumber.
THAT is the choice we are getting. Diminishing portions of cucumber.
Just watch out when those monkeys escape the cage. They can be vicious and dangerous in large numbers.
But I suspect if you observed the treatment of Mr. Lucky, receiver of the grapes, you would find that he loses the trust of his group.
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)I was splitting hairs a little bit over what was at least an initial satisfaction with the cucumber. Until the grape was introduced, it didn't appear to be unfair. My point was (and I think you alluded to the same thing when you said "diminishing portions of cucumber) is that when comparing the division of wealth, the sliver of cucumber would have been insulting without the introduction of the grape.
I'm splitting hairs. I get your point.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Kurovski
(34,655 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)I either heard from an acquaintance or read somewhere that a little angry monkey will stand on your chest and piss in your face if they think you did 'em wrong. Gotta love it.
PB
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)hunter
(38,311 posts)We have three dogs. If I do not follow the rules of dog social justice they stop listening to me.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But I am not sure it is the same thing.
It may be that they are just learning that there are no rules for them to rely upon -that you are acting on a whim.