Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It costs almost a million bucks for Congress to name a post office? Maybe even more. (Original Post) riqster May 2013 OP
There is a flaw in the logic Travis_0004 May 2013 #1
You are half right riqster May 2013 #3
What is the issue with the name? Swede Atlanta May 2013 #2
Well, you'd think Congress would be conversant with "no-brainers" riqster May 2013 #4
There should be a prohibition on naming any federal building after any congress person. LiberalFighter May 2013 #5
I feel that way about Jim Rhodes riqster May 2013 #6
 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
1. There is a flaw in the logic
Thu May 30, 2013, 05:42 PM
May 2013

let me give you another example.

At work, the business next store is our customer. I fold down invoices, and about twice a week, walk their invoice over to them instead of mailing it.

A penny pinching boss might say that I"m wasting company resources. If it takes me 5 minutes to walk the invoice there and back, wouldn't it be cheaper to just mail it. Assuming I make more than 9.20 an hour (which I do), he would be correct, but since I'm salaried, I'm getting paid if I'm walking next door, twiddling my thumbs, or I just go home earlier. So the savings for me walking the letter is .46 cents. (My main reason for doing it is to stretch for a little bit mid day).

Congress is no different. They are salaried, they are getting paid regardless of how many bills they pass. So there is a very high fixed cost to congress, just to have them show up for the year, but the marginal cost, per bill passed is very small. If they choose not to rename a post office, the actual savings would be close to 0. Maybe they save a few sheets of paper, but not much else.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
3. You are half right
Thu May 30, 2013, 08:01 PM
May 2013

I am salaried, and thus exemplify the fixed-cost model. However, if I am more productive during my working hours, I provide more benefit to my employer in the form of increased revenue.

Don't confuse a fixed cost with a sunk cost.

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
2. What is the issue with the name?
Thu May 30, 2013, 06:26 PM
May 2013

It should not be the Joe Schmoe who tied my shoes and taught me to fish P.O.

It should be the South Marion P.O. or the North Marion P.O, etc. These should be "no brainers"

riqster

(13,986 posts)
4. Well, you'd think Congress would be conversant with "no-brainers"
Thu May 30, 2013, 08:12 PM
May 2013

Being such themselves. Alas, 'tis not the case.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
6. I feel that way about Jim Rhodes
Thu May 30, 2013, 10:47 PM
May 2013

Stinking mass-murdering bastard has any number of things named after his hell-bound ass.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It costs almost a million...