General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs it racist to criticize the President?
Of course not. So don't charge racism over criticism of policy.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)that appear to suggest just that.
frylock
(34,825 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Ooh, anti-Obama defensive straw man.
cali
(114,904 posts)up your rhetoric game to 7th grade level.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)while we're jousting against straw men
cali
(114,904 posts)with a charge of racism over criticism of President Obama's policy, it's pretty much about trying to shut people down.
If you've seen any racism here directed toward the President and/or First Lady, I would hope that would be immediately alerted on.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)those regarding the president and his family being "snooty" or "angry"
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)I saw some of the responses in this thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2951684
and a few made the similar claim your making. People use those terms to criticize and nitpick all the time.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)as "uppity" if they think themselves entitled to too much respect, and "angry or surly" if they are insufficiently gracious and deferential to white people.
There is a long, sordid history behind such usage.
JustAnotherGen
(31,924 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)Rev. Jackson was just using the code words to mask his racism, right?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and offensive, especially since castration was a favored technique of Jim Crow lynch mobs to terrorize black men.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)but sometimes words are "code words" and sometimes they're not, depending on the motivation one wishes to presume about the speaker. I don't think Rev. Jackson was using "code words" in this case, but if a white repuke had said the same thing, I think people would see the "code words" in the statement.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)I think the majority, or at least the DNC Trolls who run around shouting at us to keep in line, would argue that it is Racist to claim it isn't Racist.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)I knew I had seen this in another thread. I posted the link in my response above.
kiva
(4,373 posts)but it's easier than defending centrist policies...and bonus points for looking uber-liberal.
marshall
(6,665 posts)That is inevitable because of our culture.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Racism, by its cowardly nature, often hides behind the veil of concern and criticism.
And I have no problems with seeing a racist called as such, regardless of the mechanism the racist may use to score points.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)Convenient.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)That may be your position, yet certainly not what I stated-- at best, merely a "convenient" misinterpretation.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)which means you get to decide when someone is concerned, and when someone is racist.
Let me guess where you usually come down on that.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I get to decide nothing outside of my immediate world. As I do not get to decide who willfully misinterprets a benign statement.
However, it's rather convenient that you decided "often" is now a weasel word. I'm glad you get to decide that.
cali
(114,904 posts)down criticism of the President's policies?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)If I ever see the charge leveled against one who is not a racist, I imagine I would have more than "a" problem.
boilerbabe
(2,214 posts)thread. UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE. "what posts" huh?" fucking disengenouos assholes.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)I first noticed this garbage in this reply in a post yesterday.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2951919
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)Oh, dear.
JustAnotherGen
(31,924 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,924 posts)Because he is known racist.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)many racists like Rush challenge the president.
Wounded Bear
(58,726 posts)there are ways to express criticism that are racist.
But no, not all criticism is race based.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)Does that mean one is anti-LGBT or is a suppressor of human rights if the heckler happens to be a member of the LGBT community?
I get the feeling that the recent dustup has much to do with these ancillary threads.
Don't charge homophobia over criticism of an individual's bad behavior. Sounds like a parallel.
And your original question has many answers. It's not simple, binary matter. Some criticism IS race-based, but people aren't going to run around in white hoods and sheets to make it easy to spot them. Racism is subtle and insidious, and easily couched in code words.
Prism
(5,815 posts)According to some partisans, every adjective in there is a synonym for "uppity."
Is it possible to get a new thesaurus to reflect this change?
bike man
(620 posts)ever since President 1. I would further imagine some/many of those criticizms came from non-whites, and that many/most were not racist in nature.
So, no it is not racist.