Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it racist to criticize the President? (Original Post) cali Jun 2013 OP
I've seen some responses to various posts Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #1
suggest? they flat out make accusations if you aren't in line. frylock Jun 2013 #3
On DU? Against other DUers? And if so please provide the links? nt el_bryanto Jun 2013 #6
? ProSense Jun 2013 #2
no dear. you really need to learn what a strawman is cali Jun 2013 #4
You're right. No 'policy' criticisms against Obama have a racial tinge, geek tragedy Jun 2013 #5
of course some do. but when people here at DU start in cali Jun 2013 #9
the problem is that a lot of racism finds its way into code words, especially geek tragedy Jun 2013 #11
Perhaps I'm naive but I don't get that Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #18
black people who do not "know their place" very often get disparaged geek tragedy Jun 2013 #24
+1 JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #30
Exactly, like when Jesse Jackson said the President was "talking down to black people". hughee99 Jun 2013 #19
is that the one where Jackson talked about this wish to castrate then-candidate Obama? nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #26
Yes, a.k.a "open mic night" on Faux news. n/t hughee99 Jun 2013 #37
certainly not the only example of Jackson saying something profoundly stupid geek tragedy Jun 2013 #38
Certainly not the only time, hughee99 Jun 2013 #41
on the Internet, no way to tell who's what background nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #42
Actually Savannahmann Jun 2013 #7
No. But, it's a convenient way of defending bad policy. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #8
and shutting down criticism- or at least attempting to do that. cali Jun 2013 #10
Now it's about "code" words Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #22
Of course not kiva Jun 2013 #12
There will always be a whiff of racism marshall Jun 2013 #13
Who are you talking to? Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #14
Racism, by its cowardly nature, often hides behind the veil of concern and criticism. LanternWaste Jun 2013 #15
In other words, no concern or critique is ever valid when you can attribute it to racism. Dreamer Tatum Jun 2013 #16
That may be your position, LanternWaste Jun 2013 #20
No, it's yours. You use weasel words like "often," Dreamer Tatum Jun 2013 #23
I get to decide nothing outside of my immediate world LanternWaste Jun 2013 #28
Do you have a problem with people using the charge of racism to try and shut cali Jun 2013 #17
If I ever see it, I imagine I would. LanternWaste Jun 2013 #21
I can't believe all these clueless folks missed the" racist lesbian heckler" boilerbabe Jun 2013 #25
I know, I swear this place has been the Twilight Zone this week. Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #34
No more than it is antisemitic to criticize Israel. lapislzi Jun 2013 #27
Another +1 JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #31
No it is not racist to challenge the president! hrmjustin Jun 2013 #29
Unless it's Rush Limbaugh JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #32
The very act of challenging the president is not racist, but it would be true to say hrmjustin Jun 2013 #35
Not in general.....but... Wounded Bear Jun 2013 #33
If one thinks that someone who interrupts and heckles the FLOTUS is rude and arrogant, CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #36
My thesaurus seems to be broken Prism Jun 2013 #39
I would imagine that presidential policies/actions/etc have been criticized bike man Jun 2013 #40
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. no dear. you really need to learn what a strawman is
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:03 PM
Jun 2013

up your rhetoric game to 7th grade level.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. You're right. No 'policy' criticisms against Obama have a racial tinge,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:04 PM
Jun 2013

while we're jousting against straw men

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. of course some do. but when people here at DU start in
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:09 PM
Jun 2013

with a charge of racism over criticism of President Obama's policy, it's pretty much about trying to shut people down.

If you've seen any racism here directed toward the President and/or First Lady, I would hope that would be immediately alerted on.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. the problem is that a lot of racism finds its way into code words, especially
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:11 PM
Jun 2013

those regarding the president and his family being "snooty" or "angry"

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
18. Perhaps I'm naive but I don't get that
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:24 PM
Jun 2013

I saw some of the responses in this thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2951684

and a few made the similar claim your making. People use those terms to criticize and nitpick all the time.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
24. black people who do not "know their place" very often get disparaged
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:27 PM
Jun 2013

as "uppity" if they think themselves entitled to too much respect, and "angry or surly" if they are insufficiently gracious and deferential to white people.

There is a long, sordid history behind such usage.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
19. Exactly, like when Jesse Jackson said the President was "talking down to black people".
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:25 PM
Jun 2013

Rev. Jackson was just using the code words to mask his racism, right?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
38. certainly not the only example of Jackson saying something profoundly stupid
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 04:11 PM
Jun 2013

and offensive, especially since castration was a favored technique of Jim Crow lynch mobs to terrorize black men.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
41. Certainly not the only time,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 04:16 PM
Jun 2013

but sometimes words are "code words" and sometimes they're not, depending on the motivation one wishes to presume about the speaker. I don't think Rev. Jackson was using "code words" in this case, but if a white repuke had said the same thing, I think people would see the "code words" in the statement.

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
7. Actually
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:06 PM
Jun 2013

I think the majority, or at least the DNC Trolls who run around shouting at us to keep in line, would argue that it is Racist to claim it isn't Racist.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
22. Now it's about "code" words
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:27 PM
Jun 2013

I knew I had seen this in another thread. I posted the link in my response above.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
12. Of course not
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:13 PM
Jun 2013

but it's easier than defending centrist policies...and bonus points for looking uber-liberal.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
15. Racism, by its cowardly nature, often hides behind the veil of concern and criticism.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:19 PM
Jun 2013

Racism, by its cowardly nature, often hides behind the veil of concern and criticism.

And I have no problems with seeing a racist called as such, regardless of the mechanism the racist may use to score points.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
20. That may be your position,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:25 PM
Jun 2013

That may be your position, yet certainly not what I stated-- at best, merely a "convenient" misinterpretation.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
23. No, it's yours. You use weasel words like "often,"
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:27 PM
Jun 2013

which means you get to decide when someone is concerned, and when someone is racist.

Let me guess where you usually come down on that.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
28. I get to decide nothing outside of my immediate world
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:30 PM
Jun 2013

I get to decide nothing outside of my immediate world. As I do not get to decide who willfully misinterprets a benign statement.

However, it's rather convenient that you decided "often" is now a weasel word. I'm glad you get to decide that.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
17. Do you have a problem with people using the charge of racism to try and shut
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:20 PM
Jun 2013

down criticism of the President's policies?

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
21. If I ever see it, I imagine I would.
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:26 PM
Jun 2013

If I ever see the charge leveled against one who is not a racist, I imagine I would have more than "a" problem.

boilerbabe

(2,214 posts)
25. I can't believe all these clueless folks missed the" racist lesbian heckler"
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:29 PM
Jun 2013

thread. UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE. "what posts" huh?" fucking disengenouos assholes.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
35. The very act of challenging the president is not racist, but it would be true to say
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:35 PM
Jun 2013

many racists like Rush challenge the president.

Wounded Bear

(58,726 posts)
33. Not in general.....but...
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:34 PM
Jun 2013

there are ways to express criticism that are racist.

But no, not all criticism is race based.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
36. If one thinks that someone who interrupts and heckles the FLOTUS is rude and arrogant,
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jun 2013

Does that mean one is anti-LGBT or is a suppressor of human rights if the heckler happens to be a member of the LGBT community?

I get the feeling that the recent dustup has much to do with these ancillary threads.

Don't charge homophobia over criticism of an individual's bad behavior. Sounds like a parallel.

And your original question has many answers. It's not simple, binary matter. Some criticism IS race-based, but people aren't going to run around in white hoods and sheets to make it easy to spot them. Racism is subtle and insidious, and easily couched in code words.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
39. My thesaurus seems to be broken
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 04:14 PM
Jun 2013

According to some partisans, every adjective in there is a synonym for "uppity."

Is it possible to get a new thesaurus to reflect this change?

 

bike man

(620 posts)
40. I would imagine that presidential policies/actions/etc have been criticized
Thu Jun 6, 2013, 04:15 PM
Jun 2013

ever since President 1. I would further imagine some/many of those criticizms came from non-whites, and that many/most were not racist in nature.

So, no it is not racist.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it racist to criticize...