Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So 2016 will be a Clinton vs. a Bush? (Original Post) MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 OP
I doubt it quinnox Jun 2013 #1
I'll vote for Max Baucus if it keeps another scumbag Bush out of office. Dawson Leery Jun 2013 #2
No, it will be Clinton vs. the thug from New Jersey nevergiveup Jun 2013 #3
I hope neither one. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #4
how about kirsten gillibrand? DesertFlower Jun 2013 #5
I like Gillibrand. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #13
Better than Hillary DonCoquixote Jun 2013 #52
Me too, of course! MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #8
Over a lot of dead bodies Demeter Jun 2013 #6
Hopefully neither n/t OhioChick Jun 2013 #7
Have I ever told you... MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #9
Seems both parties are pulling the restraints pretty damn tight n/t OhioChick Jun 2013 #14
Who said? longship Jun 2013 #10
What nitwit said that Warren will be running? MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #11
She's going to be a great Senator. longship Jun 2013 #15
I think she can win. MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #23
Oh yeah! Lugnut Jun 2013 #38
Puke. Arctic Dave Jun 2013 #12
Stay classy........... Beacool Jun 2013 #30
Two of the worst things that could to make the US worse. Arctic Dave Jun 2013 #35
Hillary maybe, TexasTowelie Jun 2013 #16
Howard Dean has said he might run if progressives are not being served. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2013 #17
If Dean runs in the primary, he'll probably get my vote Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #19
If he is running and has a chance of being the "not Hillary" in the primary, he has my vote karynnj Jun 2013 #45
Sen Gillibrand vs Christie will be card for 2015. CK_John Jun 2013 #18
In a really masochistic way I kind of hope so Fumesucker Jun 2013 #20
Nobody named Bush or Clinton should be allowed within a 10 mile radius of the White House tularetom Jun 2013 #21
If the establishment chooses (as they always do), I expect so. Marr Jun 2013 #22
Yes. The Establishment met in 2007 to determine who the next President should be. Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #25
Back in 2007, a good friend of mine told me that this was actually the case MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #28
I remember Obama's big national debut at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Marr Jun 2013 #37
Once the Kennedys endorsed him, Hillary was toast leftstreet Jun 2013 #39
Ever heard of Penny Pritzker? BrotherIvan Jun 2013 #41
I highly doubt that Jeb will be the Republican candidate. Nye Bevan Jun 2013 #24
You didn't like Rocky VI? jberryhill Jun 2013 #26
This is more like the 215th remake of Groundhog's Day MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #29
Ned Ryerson, is that you? jberryhill Jun 2013 #32
For the good of the country, I hope neither (nt) bigwillq Jun 2013 #27
There is a mayoral election nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #31
How predictable this place is. Beacool Jun 2013 #33
It doesn't really matter what they want. Marr Jun 2013 #40
It strikes me the GOP is good at nominating the least insane of their candidates. BlueCheese Jun 2013 #51
No, this is not 2008 DonCoquixote Jun 2013 #53
Wouldn't that mean that Dems haven't learned *ANY* lessons? delrem Jun 2013 #34
No more Bushs, No more Clintons! nt Rhymes With Orange Jun 2013 #36
2014 treestar Jun 2013 #42
+1 n/t politicasista Jun 2013 #56
The silver lining to a Clinton candidacy Jim Lane Jun 2013 #43
That's a really good point. MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #44
Hillawar? Beacool Jun 2013 #47
I know what you mean. Beacool Jun 2013 #46
"O death, when will you come?" (Liz Lemon) JackRiddler Jun 2013 #48
The neocon terraforming is unfinished whatchamacallit Jun 2013 #49
The epic battle of "The Lessers of Two Evils". New Dem vs Old Repug. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #50
I would offer you a beer, but i only have Coors :p and some dont consider it alcohol darkangel218 Jun 2013 #54
I just read that Howard Dean is considering a run. grasswire Jun 2013 #55

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
4. I hope neither one.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:44 PM
Jun 2013

When we have our first female president I would like our first one to be one that doesn't have a husband that has held elected office ever.



Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
13. I like Gillibrand.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:55 PM
Jun 2013

Her husband is a venture capitalist - at least he isn't a politician.

She will be 47 years old in December.
Seems a bit too young to me.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
52. Better than Hillary
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:03 PM
Jun 2013

Not much better, but better.

I myself would rather see Janet Napolitano or Kathleen Sibelius come out of the shadows.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
6. Over a lot of dead bodies
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:48 PM
Jun 2013

Maybe no one will run...the job is losing its status. Rapidly.

I know, I'm straining at gnats. I'd put up a Warren/Grayson or Grayson/Warren ticket, on a newly minted Peoples' Party, or 99% or something.

longship

(40,416 posts)
10. Who said?
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:51 PM
Jun 2013

The prognosticators of all prognosticators here at DU?

But I have it on high authority that it's going to be Liz Warren in 2016! Or is it Michelle Obama? I cannot remember which one. Well... Regardless, it's one of those three.

The DU prognosticators have spoken with complete accuracy, no doubt.

I think I'll consult Sylvia Browne. Maybe she knows for sure.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
11. What nitwit said that Warren will be running?
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:53 PM
Jun 2013

She's a very difficult woman, you know.

Very unladylike.

longship

(40,416 posts)
15. She's going to be a great Senator.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:59 PM
Jun 2013

If she runs for President in 2016, she'll not be such a great Senator. The question about a Warren presidency is yet to be answered.

That's all I have to say about it now.


TexasTowelie

(112,456 posts)
16. Hillary maybe,
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 11:59 PM
Jun 2013

but I'm thinking Rand Paul for the Repugnants. He has street cred as a libertarian, a racist and an asshole.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
45. If he is running and has a chance of being the "not Hillary" in the primary, he has my vote
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:13 AM
Jun 2013

In 2003, I went back and forth between JK and Dean - and really admired both. I seriously think he would easily win my current state - VT.

By the way, you may like this article about a picnic on the 10th anniversary of the start of the 2004 campaign that will happen in Burlington. The front page article in The Burlington Free Press is nice. http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20130618/NEWS03/306180024/Howard-Dean-staff-mark-10th-anniversary-presidential-campaign

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. In a really masochistic way I kind of hope so
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:09 AM
Jun 2013

I spend far more time than is good for me reading and talking about politics, a Clinton/Bush redux would solve that particular problem completely.



tularetom

(23,664 posts)
21. Nobody named Bush or Clinton should be allowed within a 10 mile radius of the White House
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:19 AM
Jun 2013

I might actually sit that one out.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
22. If the establishment chooses (as they always do), I expect so.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:26 AM
Jun 2013

The illusion of choice has become incredibly threadbare in recent years. It's like they're not even trying anymore.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
25. Yes. The Establishment met in 2007 to determine who the next President should be.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:32 AM
Jun 2013

And the Establishment determined that that person should be Barack Hussein Obama.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
28. Back in 2007, a good friend of mine told me that this was actually the case
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:42 AM
Jun 2013

He told me that Obama had been anointed by the bankers, and that Gephardt had been paid off to give Obama his staff and that the fix was in, blah, blah, blah.

I was Probama at the time, and thought my buddy was nuts. And my buddy always sounds nuts, but usually ends up being right.

And here we are.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
37. I remember Obama's big national debut at the 2004 Democratic National Convention.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:30 AM
Jun 2013

Actually, I barely remember his actual speech, because it didn't impress me as being anything particularly... well, impressive.

But the entire corporate media was abuzz about this "new star of the Democratic Party" for days afterwards. They all went on with the same type of praise; 'this Obama guy is the future of the party', etc., etc. I remember telling my roommate at the time that Obama must be a Wall Street stooge for the corporate media to be so determined to make him the new definition of the left. I don't think I was particularly insightful or anything, but I do think I was right.

Hillary was the other candidate deemed "viable" by the corporate media months ahead of any primary vote. And that's who we got to choose between; two candidates that Wall Street found acceptable-- basically the same product in two different packages. That's your level of choice.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
41. Ever heard of Penny Pritzker?
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 03:48 AM
Jun 2013

He was her guy from way back. Roll that around on your tongue for a while.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
24. I highly doubt that Jeb will be the Republican candidate.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:30 AM
Jun 2013

But Hillary is the overwhelming favorite to get the Democratic nomination. So much so that just her running will result in many Democratic big names sitting out the primary.

However a "true progressive" such as Howard Dean might well blow Hillary away and grab the nomination. In the dreams of several DUers. Yeeeeeehaaaaaaaa!

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
31. There is a mayoral election
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:45 AM
Jun 2013

And a few city council seats. After that...there is an election? Or rather a dedazo.

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
33. How predictable this place is.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:49 AM
Jun 2013

Hillary hasn't even announced whether she'll run or not. What I have no doubt though, is that if she does run, she will become the nominee. This is not 2008.

As for Jeb, no he won't be their nominee. The conservatives hate the Bushes almost as much as they hate the Clintons. They want a Tea Party candidate to be their standard bearer.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
40. It doesn't really matter what they want.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:42 AM
Jun 2013

The rich guys who own the party wanted Romney, so that's who they got. Rank and file conservatives hated Romney. Remember the whole "anyone but Romney" line? It doesn't matter what they want.

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
51. It strikes me the GOP is good at nominating the least insane of their candidates.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:02 PM
Jun 2013

Romney, McCain, Dole, etc. were actually a lot more palatable than people lile Huckabee, Pat Robertson, Ron Paul, etc.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
53. No, this is not 2008
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:08 PM
Jun 2013

Where people still had enough of a reason to care about the country that we were willing to try going in a prgressive direction for once.

Now, we know Hillary will just find a kinder, gentler way to screw us over, and if she tries not, Billy will put her in line, just like he corrected Obama about Syria,and just like he is fixing the Trans canda pipeline, no, wait a minute, that will be Hillary's job.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
34. Wouldn't that mean that Dems haven't learned *ANY* lessons?
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:52 AM
Jun 2013

That there wasn't a grassroots movement to change course, and to refuse to listen to bullshit lying rhetoric? To at least give it a shot?

I don't think the US has any more chances if it doesn't do a 180 right NOW. That means there needs to be grassroots primarying starting right now, to find and fund candidates. Concrete action. Which progressive doesn't know that most incumbents, esp. those highest in the system, are gaming the American people? There's a shitload of terrible, terrible incumbents who need to be replaced if there's to be any change. That means being courageous, having the courage of your convictions and *believing* in the win. And it means starting NOW.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
43. The silver lining to a Clinton candidacy
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:49 AM
Jun 2013

If she runs, Andrew Cuomo won't.

If she doesn't run, Cuomo will run and, IMO, is more likely than anyone else to get the nomination.

Cuomo stood up for marriage equality but has no other redeeming qualities. So here's my prediction, Manny: If Cuomo is elected President, then, by Midsummer's Day of 2017, you will be here on DU bemoaning Hillary's decision not to run.

Right now you may think that's inconceivable. Trust me, Cuomo in the White House will make a believer out of you.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
44. That's a really good point.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:08 AM
Jun 2013

Hillawar would keep the field clear of the other Third Wayers. And Hillawar can be easily beaten by an FDR Democrat (or a pretend one in the case of 2008).

Run Hillawar, run!

Beacool

(30,253 posts)
47. Hillawar?
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jun 2013

Can you at least be respectful of fellow Democrats and not act like this is Free Republic?

As for Warren, I hope she stays in the Senate a good long time because she's needed. But, only the Left wants her to run in 2016. You're all dreaming if you think that she would even have a sliver of a chance of becoming president.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
50. The epic battle of "The Lessers of Two Evils". New Dem vs Old Repug.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:00 PM
Jun 2013

Should be quite a show...if you're a fan of farce.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
54. I would offer you a beer, but i only have Coors :p and some dont consider it alcohol
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 01:11 PM
Jun 2013

Here it is anyway :p


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So 2016 will be a Clinton...