General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo 2016 will be a Clinton vs. a Bush?
Just kill me now.
God, I need a beer. And an opium chaser.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Hillary, maybe. But not a Bush. Hell, no!
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)nevergiveup
(4,764 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)When we have our first female president I would like our first one to be one that doesn't have a husband that has held elected office ever.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)Her husband is a venture capitalist - at least he isn't a politician.
She will be 47 years old in December.
Seems a bit too young to me.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Not much better, but better.
I myself would rather see Janet Napolitano or Kathleen Sibelius come out of the shadows.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Demeter
(85,373 posts)Maybe no one will run...the job is losing its status. Rapidly.
I know, I'm straining at gnats. I'd put up a Warren/Grayson or Grayson/Warren ticket, on a newly minted Peoples' Party, or 99% or something.
OhioChick
(23,218 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)... that I use your sig regularly in conversation?
OhioChick
(23,218 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)The prognosticators of all prognosticators here at DU?
But I have it on high authority that it's going to be Liz Warren in 2016! Or is it Michelle Obama? I cannot remember which one. Well... Regardless, it's one of those three.
The DU prognosticators have spoken with complete accuracy, no doubt.
I think I'll consult Sylvia Browne. Maybe she knows for sure.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)She's a very difficult woman, you know.
Very unladylike.
longship
(40,416 posts)If she runs for President in 2016, she'll not be such a great Senator. The question about a Warren presidency is yet to be answered.
That's all I have to say about it now.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)And it's her nature to try.
We'll see!
Lugnut
(9,791 posts)She's my kind of gal.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Two douchebags.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Gee, might as well be at Free Republic.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)Both are puke worthy.
TexasTowelie
(112,456 posts)but I'm thinking Rand Paul for the Repugnants. He has street cred as a libertarian, a racist and an asshole.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)So hold on. There is hope yet.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)In 2003, I went back and forth between JK and Dean - and really admired both. I seriously think he would easily win my current state - VT.
By the way, you may like this article about a picnic on the 10th anniversary of the start of the 2004 campaign that will happen in Burlington. The front page article in The Burlington Free Press is nice. http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/article/20130618/NEWS03/306180024/Howard-Dean-staff-mark-10th-anniversary-presidential-campaign
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I spend far more time than is good for me reading and talking about politics, a Clinton/Bush redux would solve that particular problem completely.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)I might actually sit that one out.
Marr
(20,317 posts)The illusion of choice has become incredibly threadbare in recent years. It's like they're not even trying anymore.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)And the Establishment determined that that person should be Barack Hussein Obama.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)He told me that Obama had been anointed by the bankers, and that Gephardt had been paid off to give Obama his staff and that the fix was in, blah, blah, blah.
I was Probama at the time, and thought my buddy was nuts. And my buddy always sounds nuts, but usually ends up being right.
And here we are.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Actually, I barely remember his actual speech, because it didn't impress me as being anything particularly... well, impressive.
But the entire corporate media was abuzz about this "new star of the Democratic Party" for days afterwards. They all went on with the same type of praise; 'this Obama guy is the future of the party', etc., etc. I remember telling my roommate at the time that Obama must be a Wall Street stooge for the corporate media to be so determined to make him the new definition of the left. I don't think I was particularly insightful or anything, but I do think I was right.
Hillary was the other candidate deemed "viable" by the corporate media months ahead of any primary vote. And that's who we got to choose between; two candidates that Wall Street found acceptable-- basically the same product in two different packages. That's your level of choice.
leftstreet
(36,116 posts)Am I the only one who remembers that?
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)He was her guy from way back. Roll that around on your tongue for a while.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But Hillary is the overwhelming favorite to get the Democratic nomination. So much so that just her running will result in many Democratic big names sitting out the primary.
However a "true progressive" such as Howard Dean might well blow Hillary away and grab the nomination. In the dreams of several DUers. Yeeeeeehaaaaaaaa!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Oh Lord.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)You know, repetitive things can indeed suck.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And a few city council seats. After that...there is an election? Or rather a dedazo.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Hillary hasn't even announced whether she'll run or not. What I have no doubt though, is that if she does run, she will become the nominee. This is not 2008.
As for Jeb, no he won't be their nominee. The conservatives hate the Bushes almost as much as they hate the Clintons. They want a Tea Party candidate to be their standard bearer.
Marr
(20,317 posts)The rich guys who own the party wanted Romney, so that's who they got. Rank and file conservatives hated Romney. Remember the whole "anyone but Romney" line? It doesn't matter what they want.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)Romney, McCain, Dole, etc. were actually a lot more palatable than people lile Huckabee, Pat Robertson, Ron Paul, etc.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Where people still had enough of a reason to care about the country that we were willing to try going in a prgressive direction for once.
Now, we know Hillary will just find a kinder, gentler way to screw us over, and if she tries not, Billy will put her in line, just like he corrected Obama about Syria,and just like he is fixing the Trans canda pipeline, no, wait a minute, that will be Hillary's job.
delrem
(9,688 posts)That there wasn't a grassroots movement to change course, and to refuse to listen to bullshit lying rhetoric? To at least give it a shot?
I don't think the US has any more chances if it doesn't do a 180 right NOW. That means there needs to be grassroots primarying starting right now, to find and fund candidates. Concrete action. Which progressive doesn't know that most incumbents, esp. those highest in the system, are gaming the American people? There's a shitload of terrible, terrible incumbents who need to be replaced if there's to be any change. That means being courageous, having the courage of your convictions and *believing* in the win. And it means starting NOW.
Rhymes With Orange
(40 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Matters.
politicasista
(14,128 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)If she runs, Andrew Cuomo won't.
If she doesn't run, Cuomo will run and, IMO, is more likely than anyone else to get the nomination.
Cuomo stood up for marriage equality but has no other redeeming qualities. So here's my prediction, Manny: If Cuomo is elected President, then, by Midsummer's Day of 2017, you will be here on DU bemoaning Hillary's decision not to run.
Right now you may think that's inconceivable. Trust me, Cuomo in the White House will make a believer out of you.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Hillawar would keep the field clear of the other Third Wayers. And Hillawar can be easily beaten by an FDR Democrat (or a pretend one in the case of 2008).
Run Hillawar, run!
Beacool
(30,253 posts)Can you at least be respectful of fellow Democrats and not act like this is Free Republic?
As for Warren, I hope she stays in the Senate a good long time because she's needed. But, only the Left wants her to run in 2016. You're all dreaming if you think that she would even have a sliver of a chance of becoming president.
Beacool
(30,253 posts)I'm no big fan of Cuomo either.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Prepare yourselves.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Should be quite a show...if you're a fan of farce.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Here it is anyway :p
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I would fully, fully support Howard Dean!