General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI wonder if Bradley Manning's torture encouraged Snowden to leave the US
before revealing his info?
I'd imagine the White House thought that torturing Manning and denying him due process, in a very public way, would terrify whistleblowers into silence. Perhaps it's just made them more evasive.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It makes sending him back harder too.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)...because his political persecution is virtually guaranteed.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Now that the US is widely known to practice torture for political purposes, during two administrations.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
http://www.hrweb.org/legal/cat.html
Article 3
No State Party shall expel, return ("refouler" or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture.
For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.
pscot
(21,024 posts)I know it's true because I read it on the internet.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Oh and kill Ralph Nader, another person with so much power that he is single-handedly responsible for everything that happened between 2000 and now.
pscot
(21,024 posts)and those 2 aren't on it.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)On my list I have those on Fox actually lower than the idiots on Corp-Media that pretend to be news-people. Ooops on second thought, Geraldo is pretty high.
Disclaimer: I dont actually wish those on my kill list dead, just made to work at McDonald's for min. wage. Well, to be completely truthful, I would like to arm some Iraqi's with shoes and turn Cheney loose to run for it thru the brush, like he does with whatever kind of birds he likes to kill. Not to hurt him of course, only to scare him good. I better stop.
pscot
(21,024 posts)to publish your list on the net. Mine tends to focus on the owners and their political minions.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)from people who may be tortured down the line.
Torturers tend to think its awesome.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)Autumn
(45,064 posts)the fuck out of the country first.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts).
gulliver
(13,180 posts)Manning trusted WikiLeaks, and look where it got him. Snowden thought he would try an unscrupulous quasi-journalist. He won't get tortured, but a lot of other people probably will be thanks to him.
MattFromKY
(43 posts)To the Children of the Night hotline.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)nineteen50
(1,187 posts)can you tell me why others and which others will be tortured because of Snowden? I keep hearing all these bad things are and are going to happen but no specifics Why?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I'd imagine the White House thought that torturing Manning and denying him due process, in a very public way, would terrify whistleblowers into silence. Perhaps it's just made them more evasive."
...know that they re-elected a President who "thought that torturing Manning and denying him due process, in a very public way, would terrify whistleblowers into silence." (Oh, and it clearly didn't have that effect on Snowden (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023083768)
I mean, this alleged "torturing" of Manning by the WH happened before the election, right?
Let's say your claim is true, did you know that you were voting for such a man?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Did you *not* know you were voting for such a man?
But Romney would likely have been much worse.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)That's your response?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)What would the correct response be?
tridim
(45,358 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 25, 2013, 07:11 AM - Edit history (1)
Solitary confinement for a year?
Made to sleep naked without sheets, under constant observation?
Those aren't torture? Or the President didn't know? Or the President was powerless to stop it? I'm curious as to your thinking, here.
tridim
(45,358 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Your post is worthy of a second grader, and a not-very-attentive one at that. Outside of telling 3WM that he's crazy, without giving the slightest rationale for the accusation, do you have anything?
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)Marine inquiry faults Bradley Manning treatment
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58991.html#ixzz2XFmwnHZP
The commander of the Marine base where Wikileaks suspect Pvt. Bradley Manning was jailed for nearly 10 months ordered an inquiry into his treatment and then overruled one of the investigators findings, Marine Corps documents obtained by POLITICO show.
A special investigation determined that Mannings jailers violated Navy policy by keeping him on suicide watch after psychiatrists concluded he was not a threat to himself, but the commander rejected that conclusion, according to the documents.
The Obama administration this year became embroiled in questions over Mannings treatment at Quantico after his jail conditions including a requirement at one point that he be stripped of all clothing drew complaints from human rights groups and liberal activists.
Then-State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley joined in the criticism, calling Mannings treatment ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid. After President Barack Obama was asked about Crowleys comments at a White House press conference, Crowley resigned. Obama said the military had assured him that Mannings treatment was appropriate. But in April Manning was moved to Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, where he is being detained under more lax conditions.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)The people who got to see Manning noticed that they were keeping him drugged up and slowly breaking his mind. On top of all the other fun stuff.
And people here at DU approved. I saw it as a REALLY bad sign- they were torturing an American citizen, a soldier no less, and denying him due process.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)Not quite as bad as Jose Padilla, but it was obvious what they were trying to do to him.
midnight
(26,624 posts)more outrages!
Hydra
(14,459 posts)By supporting their bad policies. They treat vets like crap, so I generally ignore them except to say "Bring our troops home, dammit!!"
midnight
(26,624 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)He probably got an average of 3-4 non consequitive hours of sleep during the first months.
Many DUer's think that's cool and dandy, judging from this thread. They're simply too small minded to imagine the effects that this can have. There's a reason these practices are almost universally forbidden.
But who am I talking to? I'm preaching to the choir, I know...
As if anyone of these cowards in this thread making flippant jokes about Bradley's treatment would stand more than 1 day of such.
Disguting and disappointing, aka the new normal for D's / Duers. It makes one almost desire a return of the shrub.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)So why should he be sorry?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Airc, in the end, the torture stopped after State Dept official Crowley stated publicly that the way Manning was being treated was 'stupid'. He resigned after making that statement. But his statement had an effect, thankfully and Manning was moved from the prison where he had been tortured to another prison.
Torturing Whistle Blowers negates any agreement regarding extradition with allies in the EU or any member of the UN. The International standards are clear, no nation is obliged to extradite anyone to a country where that person is likely to be subjected to torture. THAT is what Crowley, an intelligent man, was referring to.
Coccydynia
(198 posts)Vote for us. We'll only cut off three fingers. The other party, they'll cut off five.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)torture did Manning endure? Due process? Well, we'll see. Manning can appeal to scotus and if your claims are true they will be revealed then. Also, please stop using the word "whistleblower" when you mean "criminal". There are true whistleblowers, as defined by law, these two don't come close.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)Torture is fun.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)Special Rapporteur corresponded with the US government regarding Mr Manning but chose not to interview him and issued a report that consists largely of philosophical statements, rather than actual factual findings
okaawhatever
(9,461 posts)was from the UN, but the words "cruel and inhuman" were used to describe his being left without clothing at night when he was on suicide watch. While there may be some argument on the claim for solitary, I though that was a bit much. It was the same process for all prisoners, so it's not like they were punishing him uniquely.
Shoot if they think that's cruel and unusual they should see some of our recent scotus rulings.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)The Addendum A/HRC/19/61/Add.4 consists of 81 pages detailing the Special Rapporteur's correspondence with governments. Under the heading United States of America, there are two paragraphs concerning Mr Manning. Paragraph (a), titled
UA 30/12/2010
Case No.USA 20/2010
State reply:27/01/2011
19/05/2011 Allegations of prolonged solitary confinement of a soldier charged with the unauthorized disclosure of classified information
indicates that the Special Rapporteur was investigating a complaint that
... Mr. Manning was held in solitary confinement for twenty-three hours a day following his arrest in May 2010 in Iraq,and continuing through his transfer to the brig at Marine Corps Base Quantico. His solitary confinement -- lasting about eleven months -- was terminated upon his transfer from Quantico to .. Fort Leavenworth on 20 April 2011 ...
which he investigated because
... solitary confinement can amount to a breach of .. the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and .. of the Convention against Torture ...
For the investigation
... the Special Rapporteur requested an opportunity to interview him ... The US Government authorized the visit but .. could not ensure that the conversation would not be monitored. Since a non-private conversation with an inmate would violate the terms of reference applied universally in fact-finding by Special Procedures, the Special Rapporteur had to decline the invitation ...
The Special Rapporteur then reiterates
... imposing seriously punitive conditions of detention on someone .. not .. found guilty of any crime is a violation of .. physical and psychological integrity as well as .. presumption of innocence. The Special Rapporteur again renews his request for a private and unmonitored meeting with Mr. Manning to assess his conditions of detention ...
Paragraph (b) notes his further request for an unmonitored meeting with the prisoner produced no official response
Personally, I believe the US government should have granted the Special Rapporteur's request for an unmonitored meeting, but my concern (regarding the failure to do so) is ameliorated somewhat the fact that Mr Manning has access to an attorney who can meet with him unmonitored and who would be in a position to raise any maltreatment issues. The most that can be said to date in this regard, however, is that 112 days have been removed from whatever sentence Manning ultimately receives, on the grounds that
... Manning's confinement was "more rigorous than necessary" ...<and> ... "became excessive in relation to legitimate government interests" ...
Judge reduces Bradley Manning's possible sentence
AP/ January 8, 2013, 4:38 PM
which falls rather short of the claim Manning has been tortured
RVN VET
(492 posts)yet he was tortured -- held in solitary, humiliated, left wondering whether his life was in jeopardy, not offered the possibility of a trial of any sort and, then, provided one after he'd already been, essentially, pre-punished for what he was alleged to have done (even though the allegations themselves were never really made clear).
Yep, I would have run if I were Snowden. Even more than Manning's incarceration and ugly treatment, though, i would have been concerned about renditioning and that old South American standby that the School of the americas provided graduate school training in: being "desaparecido".
Still a lot of mystery about Snowden's motivations, how he got his job, what he "stole", etc., etc. But I don't doubt for an instant his justification for getting out of Dodge and staying out.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)he would be tried
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Not a very suspenseful trial now...
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Manning was, for 9 months, subjected to methods that almost the whole world - and the US before Bushie was selected - deemed to be torture.
This is in the public record, everyone can google it for himself.
If you're willing to ridicule what Manning went through... Would you offer yourself for 9 months for a little experiment?
michigandem58
(1,044 posts)Oh wait looks like they do.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)And then let's see if you're still that smarmy at the end of the first week.
michigandem58
(1,044 posts)but I'm not a criminal. No desire to go through what Manning did, but that doesn't make it torture. Try not breaking the law.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)As did the US before Bush was selected.
lamp_shade
(14,828 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Who you don't respect, I take it.
tridim
(45,358 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Thanks in advance.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)ergo, it must be false.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)like a Bible-thumper
tridim
(45,358 posts)DERP.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)OK, you got them on that one.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)23 hour a day naked solitary confinement for a year is not torture, does that sum up your position correctly?
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Sleep deprivation is also cool nowadays, it seems.
I can't believe this thread. I really can't.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Perhaps when one realizes they are defending torture simply because the Obama Administration does it one has second thoughts. Or at least we can hope
People are asserting that Manning wasn't tortured, now?
This Snowden thing's really got people rattled...
:wft:
tridim
(45,358 posts)It's not difficult. Google is your friend.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)krawhitham
(4,644 posts)It's complete bull shit, but so are a lot of DU memes lately
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Following his conscience since he is revealing more all the time. It is getting into the traitor bracket now. He is a scumbag.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)CONGRATULATIONS!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)I notices that popping up today on DU from the predictable places.
Was that in the latest government recommended talking points distribution?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)LEOs where I live use that term as an endearing nickname for we the people, unless talking to a suit.
Authoritarians love sounding and feeling like "tough cops". Then again some of them may actually be among the brave blue few not afraid to administer street justice by group beating a handcuffed person fetal on the ground or using TG or electricity for some needed on the scene torture.
tblue
(16,350 posts)have taken over the Democratic Party. It's clearer every day. It used to be just some of the pols--the Blue Dogs/Third Way Dems. Now it's the everyday voter putting the state before the people and the Constitution. How is that any different from the Republicans?
frylock
(34,825 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that?
Btw, Cheney and Fleischer and King share your view, not sure that is proof of anything, but they too have failed to provide anything but their over-wrought, expected, emotional diatribes in response to their spying programs being exposed.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)I only ask because that is a cop phrase used to describe non-LEO's
They like to call people under their charge "scumbags" I assume to dehumanize them prior to beating the crap out of them for walking while poor, or giving a cop a "disrespectful" look.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)that cause LEO's to beat up teenagers with puppies.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)~George Orwell, 1984
What have we become?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)And we're seeing a mass revision of history- where the Bush Admin was NOT wrong to start wars, spy and torture...because it's all legal now.
Just imagine what the Bushes will do when they come back in 2016 with that kind of power and public support
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,613 posts)Snowden is civilian. Makes it a little different.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,613 posts)The military can do what it wants, no questions asked.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)They cannot do anything they want.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...and the other HERO exposed the vast extent to which we have lost our freedom from being surveilled by our own government with our own money paying for it, as if we were the enemy. Which I suppose we are since to psychopaths, everyone looks like the enemy.
- Either way, if we continue to focus on these HEROES and not what they've exposed, we deserve anything that happens after that.
In answer to the issue of the press and others attacking Edward Snowden instead of the NSA: ''It's like blaming the guy who turned the light on while ignoring the roaches he exposed.'' Tierra_y_Libertad
tblue
(16,350 posts)No due process. Unless you are a wealthy campaign donor, then you can do anything you want.
AG Eric Holder:
"Due process and judicial process are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security. The Constitution guarantees due process, not judicial process.
http://m.theatlanticwire.com/national/2012/03/holder-due-process-doesnt-necessarily-mean-courtroom/49509/
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Keep on apologizing for a fucking traitor.
JI7
(89,248 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Or how to kill silently with his bare hands in about 2 seconds. I mean, good god.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)When the "music" is torture, and lack of due process, that's a particularly unlikely thing to happen.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)will a traitor. He never was a whistleblower in any sense of the word. People here were played like a fucking fiddle by the traitor and his slick PR guy who masquerades as a journalist and gives lawyers a bad name.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)5 U.S.C. § 2302
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/2302
http://www.iecjournal.org/iec/2011/03/whistleblowers-in-intelligence-community.html
"Whistleblowers in Intelligence Community" You can also find a PDF of the whole article to download. It's quite good.
treestar
(82,383 posts)He's more likely to be tortured by Russia, China, Ecuador.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)2. He was not tortured. He was on suicide watch and you made it "torture" because you love to exaggerate.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I take it that you disagree with the UN?
What he experienced was not typical military process, by any means.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Is the UN now some sort of undebatable authority? I thought lockstep was out of the question.
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 25, 2013, 06:03 PM - Edit history (1)
Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)Last edited Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:26 AM - Edit history (1)
It's so hard to keep track of this conditional commander in chief thing!
So, who stole his control away? And when?
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)and probably correct.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)at this point I think any reasonable person would consider it under the circumstances.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Looking at the US objectively right now... Not so good. I'd like to stick around and be part of the solution, but I'm not sure there's a critical mass right now of people with open eyes and open hearts to get something going.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)good or bad is very debatable at this point--I was forcibly retired after the crash (construction biz went away). Very luckily had some resources. Looked around and realized I could sit on the pile, watch it get smaller and hope that it out-lasted the crisis, or make a move.
A BIG move: because of health issues/pre-existing conditions/the usual BS I couldn't even relocate to another state.
So we left the country. I don't know, now, if we will come back.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)OK if you don't want to share.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)With my ailing 90-yr-old mother in tow, we only went as far as Mexico. She passed last year, and we are now--oddly enough--moving on to Ecuador (beautiful place, excellent climate, very inexpensive, good and growing economy...).
Sounds like we will be having company, too.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'm envious!
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)that abuse human rights -- there is a brain drain-- all the educated and skilled people leave.
As long as the US represented a safe haven against abuses, we were an ideal destination. If these policies continue this country will suffer yet another blow to our infrastructure.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Fewer bright students will come, more educated and skilled people will leave.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)and I haven't done much to incur the wrath of Obama & Co.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)and what happened to both of them. So yes, that is why he made sure he was not in the immediate control of us authorities or compliant regimes. He also made sure that he did do an un-vetted document dump as wikileaks did so that the charge of harming military personnel, while it would of course still be made, would be more clearly nonsense.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 25, 2013, 08:58 AM - Edit history (1)
Or maybe it's eleventy-dimensional chess of some sort. One never knows.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)It is counterproductive. You don't encourage loyalty that way.
You encourage loyalty by prosecuting people who lie to start a war.
You encourage loyalty by standing on a moral high ground and making the people who work for or with you proud to be working for and with you.
Obama does this well. He treats people with respect. But when you ask people to do things that offend their consciences, then you can expect disloyalty. An occasional transgression won't get a huge reaction, but as things add up, it will be precisely the people who are the most honest and hardworking and whom you need the most who will balk, become silently angry and may become disloyal.
It doesn't always work the way I have described, but it is pretty much the rule.
In business, people sometimes go and start their own competing business because they simply think they can do things better, but that is not relevant to Snowden.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)giving some folks a pass for bad work, while holding others accountable. Rules must be set, and followed fairly.
navarth
(5,927 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)Or based on other comments, would you simply have not talked about what you saw if you were Snowden?
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)which is what he claimed to be concerned about.
And left all the documents about US spying on other countries, which is destroying his credibility and proving to be a major distraction.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)We'll have to see what he has. I just read a thread that says the gov't now has no idea how many documents he stole...which means either they're lying for effect, or Booz-Allen workers have FAR too much access to our data.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)that privatization of our government intelligence work was an incredibly stupid idea.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)But doesn't really deliver the desired result if we want to catch terrorists...which they don't seem to be too concerned about if Boston was any indication.
We'll have to see where Snowden goes with this, but just the fact that he popped out of Booz-Allen and was able to do all of this should be a HUGE wakeup call to people outside the system- it's broken, in a very bad way.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)He took documents showing that the United States government was engaged in spying on commercial (i.e. non-governmental) enterprises located in foreign countries.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)For example, while Obama was meeting with Putin, Snowden released documents related to US spying on the previous Prime Minister.
And in China, by the way, there is no bright dividing line between governmental and commercial activities.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2013/06/officials-how-edward-snowden-could-hurt-the-u-s/
Beyond technical systems, U.S. officials are deeply concerned that Snowden used his sensitive position to read about U.S. human assets, for example spies and informants overseas as well as safe houses and key spying centers.
They worry this recent quote from Snowden was not an exaggeration: I had access to the full rosters of everyone working at the NSA, the entire intelligence community, and undercover assets all over the world. The locations of every station, we have what their missions are, and so forth.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)JVS
(61,935 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Like "Private Leisure Time" for solitary, and "Benevolent Brunches" for force feeding.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'm always trying to sensationalize these things.
Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #101)
Post removed
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)due-process-free executions and chained CPI.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)but you make a really good point, in my opinion.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)I can;t believe how easy it was for a high school drop out to infiltrate the NSA and successfully access secret documents in such a short time. He exposed a soft underbelly to the NSA.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)It's difficult to see how a chilling effect on those who wish to expose abuse could not be brought about by such treatment of prisoners, whether you think they're justified on their actions or not.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Manning didn't. Drake and the other previous NSA whistleblowers tried the channels and got nowhere. Snowden didn't feel like he had channels to go through.
And when Snowden saw what happened to Manning, what did you think he was going to do? He's not stupid.
If the penalty for disclosing secrets is a year in jail, and it's normal jail, and that jail's run professionally, and not a gladiator school, or an Abu Ghraib, then maybe more people like Snowden would be happy to suck it up and serve a sentence.
But when Manning gets supermaxed, Jose Padilla gets tortured, countless other prisoners are routinely subjected to beatings, rape, random shankings, guards instigating prisoners to assault each other, deprivation of medical care, etc. etc. etc., one concludes that America's prison system has turned into medieval dungeons, and you'd have to be crazy to allow yourself to be subjected to that.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)pnwmom
(108,977 posts)he could have gone directly to his representatives in Congress.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Pelican
(1,156 posts)Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
felix_numinous This message was self-deleted by its author.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)Bob Schieffer and all the rest would be hailing him as the next Rosa Parks and MLK Jr!
Or not!
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)everyone else into blindly following authoritarian rule. Any sane person would leave a country knowing they would not get a fair trial and be tortured. Other motives aside.
This country has changed profoundly, and many here can witness the related shift within the Democratic Party and on this board.
It saddens me, because I am not sure how to proceed. Backing torture and banning all whistleblowing protections is a quantum leap to the right.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)smart guy. I can believe that he was entrusted with a lot of access to the surveillance system. He must be one of the best systems administrators around. He is one of these people who can look at a complex chart and make sense of it in seconds. That is an unusual talent. But I have seen people who have it. Snowden aside from his revelations to the public is one brilliant individual.
He is really smart and I respect him just for that fact. It is a shame that his intelligence was employed to do surveillance on others. He could have been a brilliant biologist or astronomer or something really helpful.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...that Abu Ghraib inspired acts of violence against the United States.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)warrprayer
(4,734 posts)that if Snowden is smart he will stay in Russia.