Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Irony (Original Post) ProSense Jul 2013 OP
Where is the irony? naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #1
Maybe I read it wrong. ProSense Jul 2013 #2
What's ironic about that? Nt naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #3
You're right, there is nothing ironic about expecting a "vindictive" person to issue a "pardon." ProSense Jul 2013 #6
Where did the word expect come from? naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #7
Which ProSense Jul 2013 #8
I don't know naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #10
Really? ProSense Jul 2013 #12
No I don't understand the irony at all naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #13
Maybe if they made some PowerPoint slides Life Long Dem Jul 2013 #28
This is where PRISM algorithms could come in handy NoOneMan Jul 2013 #45
You really need to stop assuming everyone who disagrees with you is a horrible person. nt Romulus Quirinus Jul 2013 #17
you know this is quite silly...right? n/t Sheepshank Jul 2013 #56
You could have used the verb in the tweet. "Deserve" I believe it was tkmorris Jul 2013 #11
Wrong. ProSense Jul 2013 #15
hehehe galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #37
Everything? Renew Deal Jul 2013 #55
Obama is said to be wise, ps RobertEarl Jul 2013 #4
Is he "vindictive"? ProSense Jul 2013 #5
by "wise", it would appear you actually mean "compliant" and "obedient" Sheepshank Jul 2013 #59
Yup. It is quite clear and easy to see the irony. I thought Dem supporters knew irony.(never assume) graham4anything Jul 2013 #52
and Greenwald has a dicktive mentality. n/t Whisp Jul 2013 #9
That sounds like some kind of gay slur to me. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #31
LOL. Epic Fail. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #14
No, it's irony ProSense Jul 2013 #16
Is your thread in response to grahamhgreens? (posted about an hour before yours) Electric Monk Jul 2013 #19
That's "ironic"? ProSense Jul 2013 #21
Tragic Irony (see 3b) Electric Monk Jul 2013 #23
Not ironic in the slightest. You clearly don't know what irony is. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #22
Don'tcha think? WilliamPitt Jul 2013 #65
Dodging the issue. Again. Apophis Jul 2013 #18
The issue is the OP. You don't have to like it. ProSense Jul 2013 #20
I bet whoever wrote it got a kick out of it too. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2013 #32
This makes less sense than most of your misleading titles. n-t Logical Jul 2013 #24
That comment makes no sense as usual. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #25
Really? NoOneMan Jul 2013 #29
Yes, really. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #30
Agree to disagree NoOneMan Jul 2013 #33
I think you should get a refund on that Word A Day calendar. nt Union Scribe Jul 2013 #26
Like rain on your wedding day NoOneMan Jul 2013 #27
How is that ironic? TDale313 Jul 2013 #34
It's a black fly in your Chardonnay NoOneMan Jul 2013 #35
Now, a death row pardon two minutes too late... TDale313 Jul 2013 #36
Inigo Montoya... egduj Jul 2013 #38
LOL! n-t Logical Jul 2013 #39
Oh, ProSense Jul 2013 #40
+1 beat me to it LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #68
Oops! Back to the drawing board. Luminous Animal Jul 2013 #41
Check this out Rex Jul 2013 #42
Yeah, ProSense Jul 2013 #43
LOL, owned..... Logical Jul 2013 #44
? ProSense Jul 2013 #46
bump DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #47
Thanks ProSense Jul 2013 #48
I get it. You don't know what irony is. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #49
Oh man, that's hilarious. ProSense Jul 2013 #50
I love kicking this thread. Your ignorance on display for everyone to see. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #51
Well, ProSense Jul 2013 #53
It's not a disagreement. You simply don't know what irony is. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #54
No, that's your opinion and ProSense Jul 2013 #57
Nope. No irony in the OP at all. That is a fact. DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #58
No, it's your opinion. Thanks, again. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #60
Your ignorance on display. Kick! DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #61
We could do this all day, and I suspect that embarrassment is setting in for you. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #62
You think I'm embarrassed because I know the meaning of words? LOL DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #63
No, I think you're embarrassed that desperation is all you have left. ProSense Jul 2013 #64
I was trying to give you an easy out of this thread. Alert! Alert! DesMoinesDem Jul 2013 #67
There you go again, trying to cover embarrassment by deflecting. n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #72
DMD is correct LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #69
No, but ProSense Jul 2013 #71
You're wrong. Time to admit it LondonReign2 Jul 2013 #73
LOL! n/t ProSense Jul 2013 #74
Is it bad form to say that, while I respect your passionate defenses HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #66
That's OK ProSense Jul 2013 #70
This has nothing to do with irony at all NuclearDem Jul 2013 #75

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Maybe I read it wrong.
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 09:47 PM
Jul 2013

I thought Greenwald was retweeting a story about Snowden deserving a Presidential pardon after having previously declared that the President was "vindictive"

Let me check...yup, just as I thought.



ProSense

(116,464 posts)
6. You're right, there is nothing ironic about expecting a "vindictive" person to issue a "pardon."
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:04 PM
Jul 2013

In fact, "vindictive" people often forgive and forget.

Thanks for helping me to see the light.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
8. Which
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:27 PM
Jul 2013

"Where did the word expect come from? I didn't see that in your original post"

..."word" should I have used to characterize the retweet of the story to show the irony?

Pushing?

Promoting?

Suggesting?

Implying?

Supporting?

Tell me?

 

naaman fletcher

(7,362 posts)
10. I don't know
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:39 PM
Jul 2013

Expect has a specific meaning that you put into greenwalds mouth so that you could make this post about irony.

Don't ask me what words to use.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
12. Really?
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:43 PM
Jul 2013

"I don't know

Expect has a specific meaning that you put into greenwalds mouth so that you could make this post about irony.

Don't ask me what words to use. "

"Expect" isn't in the OP. It's clearly ironic, but you started your protest before I used the word "expect."

I think you damn well understood the irony, but were simply upset that it was being pointed out.


 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
45. This is where PRISM algorithms could come in handy
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 12:19 AM
Jul 2013

Maybe they can connect all those random neurons in your brains into networks so you can both suddenly find irony in non ironic things and think exactly like a terrorist that needs to be locked up.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
11. You could have used the verb in the tweet. "Deserve" I believe it was
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:42 PM
Jul 2013

Of course if you had you couldn't call it irony because it isn't. A person can deserve a thing without really expecting to receive it.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
15. Wrong.
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jul 2013

"You could have used the verb in the tweet. "Deserve" I believe it was

Of course if you had you couldn't call it irony because it isn't. A person can deserve a thing without really expecting to receive it."

Again, I posted no comment with the OP. The article wasn't written by Greenwald, but he is that one who made the claim that the President is "vindictive"

The fact that he's retweeting a piece about a Presidential pardon after calling the President "vindictive" is in itself ironic.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. Obama is said to be wise, ps
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 09:50 PM
Jul 2013

So if he is wise he will pardon Snowden. Are you claiming Obama is not wise?

Obama can't do anything but forgive Snowden, and forget about wiretapping us. Or are you in favor of Obama wiretapping us?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. Is he "vindictive"?
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:02 PM
Jul 2013

"So if he is wise he will pardon Snowden. Are you claiming Obama is not wise?"

I suppose he might be since Snowden has been charged. I mean, you've defined "wise" as what you want to happen in terms of Snowden.

"Obama can't do anything but forgive Snowden, and forget about wiretapping us. Or are you in favor of Obama wiretapping us?"

Obama is "wiretapping" us?




 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
59. by "wise", it would appear you actually mean "compliant" and "obedient"
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:48 AM
Jul 2013

to RobertEarl's request.

Pretty funny imho.

....and then follow the whole statement with the ridiculous strawman "...Or are you in favor of Obama wiretapping us?"

even funnier or pathetic....still trying to decide.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
52. Yup. It is quite clear and easy to see the irony. I thought Dem supporters knew irony.(never assume)
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:35 AM
Jul 2013

Never assume is how the phrase went.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
16. No, it's irony
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 10:57 PM
Jul 2013

I'm fairly certain that Greenwald knows there isn't a Presidential pardon coming from Obama.

There is that.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
27. Like rain on your wedding day
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 11:36 PM
Jul 2013

You could write an entire song about non-ironic, Snowden related things that you think are ironic.


Its like whiiiiistleblowing, cleeeeasssified infurmaaaaheyaaaation. Its like appliiiiiiyeang for asyleeeeum, when your countreeee waaants to keeelilll yooooou.

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
34. How is that ironic?
Mon Jul 8, 2013, 11:47 PM
Jul 2013

Not sure that means what you think it does.

To me, not ironic to feel that a certain act would be the right thing to do, regardless of how likely you think someone is to do it or what your opinion of that person is.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
53. Well,
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:39 AM
Jul 2013

"I love kicking this thread. Your ignorance on display for everyone to see."

...I love that you're "kicking this thread." It shows a certain desperation. I mean, you disagree with the point, and I stand by it and can support my POV.

You are laughing because you don't get it, therefore you have to project that it's "ignorance."

Yeah, thanks for "kicking this thread."

See you soon.



ProSense

(116,464 posts)
57. No, that's your opinion and
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:44 AM
Jul 2013

you're apparently desperate that it be accepted as fact.

More irony:

Does Snowden know Venezuela records and broadcasts activists' phone calls?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023204235





 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
63. You think I'm embarrassed because I know the meaning of words? LOL
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 12:01 PM
Jul 2013
You get paid by the post, right?

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
69. DMD is correct
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 12:22 PM
Jul 2013

You apparently truly don't understand the meaning of the word. Digging in your heels and insisting that you are always correct when it is patently obvious that you are is just foolish.

If I state that Dick Cheney should stand trial for war crimes, even when I know that is going to be forthcoming, is that ironic? Nope, and neither is Greenwald agreeing that Snowden should be pardoned even though he knows it isn't forthcoming.

You made a mistake. It happens.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
71. No, but
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 12:35 PM
Jul 2013

"You apparently truly don't understand the meaning of the word. Digging in your heels and insisting that you are always correct when it is patently obvious that you are is just foolish."

...I would expect this from those who believe Snowden and Greenwald are off limits for criticism.

"If I state that Dick Cheney should stand trial for war crimes, even when I know that is going to be forthcoming, is that ironic? Nope, and neither is Greenwald agreeing that Snowden should be pardoned even though he knows it isn't forthcoming. "

What? I mean, are you missing something?

You know, like the point about the President being "vindictive."



 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
66. Is it bad form to say that, while I respect your passionate defenses
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 12:05 PM
Jul 2013

of President Obama and his administration, I deeply dislike and resent your style of argumentation? By that, I mean this business of posting a cryptic thread title followed by a series of links. What, is the reader supposed to divine your meaning through mind-reading? I had to get many posts in before it became clear to me what your point was or is.

I think you owe it to your readers to do more than simply paste in links when you fashion an OP. You should be stating a thesis and providing support for it, not placing your readers on some Rorschach romp of figuring out the meaning of your various (l)ink blots.

Color me highly annoyed. Apologies to the board if this is too Meta.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
70. That's OK
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 12:28 PM
Jul 2013

"Is it bad form to say that, while I respect your passionate defenses of President Obama and his administration, I deeply dislike and resent your style of argumentation? By that, I mean this business of posting a cryptic thread title followed by a series of links. What, is the reader supposed to divine your meaning through mind-reading? I had to get many posts in before it became clear to me what your point was or is.

I think you owe it to your readers to do more than simply paste in links when you fashion an OP. You should be stating a thesis and providing support for it, not placing your readers on some Rorschach romp of figuring out the meaning of your various (l)ink blots.

Color me highly annoyed. Apologies to the board if this is too Meta."

...I'm not impressed by your argument either. I mean, it appears thoroughly disingenuous, an attempt to disguise the fact that you disagree with my opinions, likely the criticism of Snowden, by inventing a label for them. What the hell are you talking about?

You "resent" and "cryptic thread title followed by a series of links"? WTF? "Is it bad form to say"? What you did was try to frame a personal attack as intelligent critique, when it's nothing but pyschobabble.

I really don't "owe" you anything. If you don't like what I post, that's your problem, not mine. I don't care what you "resent."

"Rorschach romp"

Oh my...



 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
75. This has nothing to do with irony at all
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 04:29 PM
Jul 2013

Greenwald (correctly) analyzed the overly-vindictive nature of the charges against Snowden. He also supported the idea of Snowden getting a pardon.

The two are not contradictory.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Irony