General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIrony
Why Edward Snowden deserves a presidential pardon. My take in the FT.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/0ccf2d14-e7c1-11e2-babb-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2YTznNbY7
Retweeted by Glenn Greenwald
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald
Greenwald: Snowden Charges Show Obamas Vindictive Mentality...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023068613
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)I don't understand your post
ProSense
(116,464 posts)I thought Greenwald was retweeting a story about Snowden deserving a Presidential pardon after having previously declared that the President was "vindictive"
Let me check...yup, just as I thought.
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)In fact, "vindictive" people often forgive and forget.
Thanks for helping me to see the light.
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)I didn't see that in your original post
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Where did the word expect come from? I didn't see that in your original post"
..."word" should I have used to characterize the retweet of the story to show the irony?
Pushing?
Promoting?
Suggesting?
Implying?
Supporting?
Tell me?
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)Expect has a specific meaning that you put into greenwalds mouth so that you could make this post about irony.
Don't ask me what words to use.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I don't know
Expect has a specific meaning that you put into greenwalds mouth so that you could make this post about irony.
Don't ask me what words to use. "
"Expect" isn't in the OP. It's clearly ironic, but you started your protest before I used the word "expect."
I think you damn well understood the irony, but were simply upset that it was being pointed out.
naaman fletcher
(7,362 posts)Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)Maybe that would help.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Maybe they can connect all those random neurons in your brains into networks so you can both suddenly find irony in non ironic things and think exactly like a terrorist that needs to be locked up.
Romulus Quirinus
(524 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)tkmorris
(11,138 posts)Of course if you had you couldn't call it irony because it isn't. A person can deserve a thing without really expecting to receive it.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"You could have used the verb in the tweet. "Deserve" I believe it was
Of course if you had you couldn't call it irony because it isn't. A person can deserve a thing without really expecting to receive it."
Again, I posted no comment with the OP. The article wasn't written by Greenwald, but he is that one who made the claim that the President is "vindictive"
The fact that he's retweeting a piece about a Presidential pardon after calling the President "vindictive" is in itself ironic.
galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)Renew Deal
(81,860 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)So if he is wise he will pardon Snowden. Are you claiming Obama is not wise?
Obama can't do anything but forgive Snowden, and forget about wiretapping us. Or are you in favor of Obama wiretapping us?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"So if he is wise he will pardon Snowden. Are you claiming Obama is not wise?"
I suppose he might be since Snowden has been charged. I mean, you've defined "wise" as what you want to happen in terms of Snowden.
"Obama can't do anything but forgive Snowden, and forget about wiretapping us. Or are you in favor of Obama wiretapping us?"
Obama is "wiretapping" us?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)to RobertEarl's request.
Pretty funny imho.
....and then follow the whole statement with the ridiculous strawman "...Or are you in favor of Obama wiretapping us?"
even funnier or pathetic....still trying to decide.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Never assume is how the phrase went.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Is it a gay slur? It sounds like a gay slur to me.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)You have a worse understanding of ironic than Alanis Morissette.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)I'm fairly certain that Greenwald knows there isn't a Presidential pardon coming from Obama.
There is that.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Why?
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Thread Win.
Apophis
(1,407 posts)I'm shocked.
Your posts are like broken records.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)I got a kick out of it.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)You could write an entire song about non-ironic, Snowden related things that you think are ironic.
Its like whiiiiistleblowing, cleeeeasssified infurmaaaaheyaaaation. Its like appliiiiiiyeang for asyleeeeum, when your countreeee waaants to keeelilll yooooou.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)Not sure that means what you think it does.
To me, not ironic to feel that a certain act would be the right thing to do, regardless of how likely you think someone is to do it or what your opinion of that person is.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)That is pretty ironic.
egduj
(805 posts)I do: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023204132#post15
Still, this thread is fun.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)Maybe the OP needs a dictionary
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)WTF?
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)I know you don't get it: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023204132#post15
Also, I'm fairly certain that Greenwald knows there isn't a Presidential pardon coming from Obama.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Thanks for kicking the thread.
The OP content deserves more exposure.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)"I love kicking this thread. Your ignorance on display for everyone to see."
...I love that you're "kicking this thread." It shows a certain desperation. I mean, you disagree with the point, and I stand by it and can support my POV.
You are laughing because you don't get it, therefore you have to project that it's "ignorance."
Yeah, thanks for "kicking this thread."
See you soon.
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)you're apparently desperate that it be accepted as fact.
More irony:
Does Snowden know Venezuela records and broadcasts activists' phone calls?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023204235
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)Kick!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Thanks, again!
DesMoinesDem
(1,569 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)You apparently truly don't understand the meaning of the word. Digging in your heels and insisting that you are always correct when it is patently obvious that you are is just foolish.
If I state that Dick Cheney should stand trial for war crimes, even when I know that is going to be forthcoming, is that ironic? Nope, and neither is Greenwald agreeing that Snowden should be pardoned even though he knows it isn't forthcoming.
You made a mistake. It happens.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"You apparently truly don't understand the meaning of the word. Digging in your heels and insisting that you are always correct when it is patently obvious that you are is just foolish."
...I would expect this from those who believe Snowden and Greenwald are off limits for criticism.
"If I state that Dick Cheney should stand trial for war crimes, even when I know that is going to be forthcoming, is that ironic? Nope, and neither is Greenwald agreeing that Snowden should be pardoned even though he knows it isn't forthcoming. "
What? I mean, are you missing something?
You know, like the point about the President being "vindictive."
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)But of course you can't.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)HardTimes99
(2,049 posts)of President Obama and his administration, I deeply dislike and resent your style of argumentation? By that, I mean this business of posting a cryptic thread title followed by a series of links. What, is the reader supposed to divine your meaning through mind-reading? I had to get many posts in before it became clear to me what your point was or is.
I think you owe it to your readers to do more than simply paste in links when you fashion an OP. You should be stating a thesis and providing support for it, not placing your readers on some Rorschach romp of figuring out the meaning of your various (l)ink blots.
Color me highly annoyed. Apologies to the board if this is too Meta.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Is it bad form to say that, while I respect your passionate defenses of President Obama and his administration, I deeply dislike and resent your style of argumentation? By that, I mean this business of posting a cryptic thread title followed by a series of links. What, is the reader supposed to divine your meaning through mind-reading? I had to get many posts in before it became clear to me what your point was or is.
I think you owe it to your readers to do more than simply paste in links when you fashion an OP. You should be stating a thesis and providing support for it, not placing your readers on some Rorschach romp of figuring out the meaning of your various (l)ink blots.
Color me highly annoyed. Apologies to the board if this is too Meta."
...I'm not impressed by your argument either. I mean, it appears thoroughly disingenuous, an attempt to disguise the fact that you disagree with my opinions, likely the criticism of Snowden, by inventing a label for them. What the hell are you talking about?
You "resent" and "cryptic thread title followed by a series of links"? WTF? "Is it bad form to say"? What you did was try to frame a personal attack as intelligent critique, when it's nothing but pyschobabble.
I really don't "owe" you anything. If you don't like what I post, that's your problem, not mine. I don't care what you "resent."
"Rorschach romp"
Oh my...
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Greenwald (correctly) analyzed the overly-vindictive nature of the charges against Snowden. He also supported the idea of Snowden getting a pardon.
The two are not contradictory.