General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeithner cashes in on Wall Street - Many more to follow
>>>
Deutsche Bank was one of Geithners first stops, and it paid the former Treasury Secretary and New York Fed chief $200,000 for one speech in June. Two hundred thousand dollars.
But for the Germans, its the least they can do to thank Geithner for his service.
Back in 2008, when he was head of the New York Federal Reserve, Geithner gave AIGs creditors a backdoor bailout by ensuring that they wouldnt have to take losses on the credit-default swaps bets that had offloaded their CDO risk to the insurer.
Before Geithner got his hands on it, AIG had been negotiating haircuts with its Wall Street counterparties of as much as 40 percent. but when Geithner took over the once-AAA giant:
One of those banks was Deutsche Bank, which helped create the subprime CDO racket and was on the hook for up to $8.5 billion if AIG went under.
Thanks to Geithner, the Germans got all their money back via US taxpayers and Too Big to Fail went international. His office later tried to cover up the details of the bailout by forcing AIG not to disclose that it had paid 100 cents on the dollar to its CDS counterpartiesa fact that the SEC asked the insurer to disclose.
>>>
http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/geithner_cashes_in_on_wall_str.php
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)In a just world they would be in prison.
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)The people that he has let down and pissed off don't pay big $$ for speaking engagements.
colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)Of all the people who could possibly have been appointed to that post, the president appointed this guy. The president is not a stupid man; therefore, there was no excuse possible. That's when I pretty much lost hope for "change."
AnneD
(15,774 posts)When I read his cabinet selection, I knew we were p3wned.
I was angry because I worked OT just to donate to the campaign in addition to volunteering time. After the announcement and especially after he renominated Bernanke, I washed my hands of it. Last election cycle, I went Green. Not that it means shit, Texas still went Romney, but my message was for the DEMs.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)... because, well they weren't responsible financially.
Un-fucking-believable.
Democrats, Republicans - who needs them.
K&R
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...they fuck us over, time and time again, and then they laugh all the way to their (too big to fail) banks...
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Pulled off in Autumn of 2008. Instead, he headed up Treasury, much to the delight of AIG and Goldman Sachs, and while there, he lied to Congress, which should have seen him impeached from the position.
Unknown Beatle
(2,672 posts)in front of us, for everyone to see their malfeasance, and they just don't care because they know they'll get away with their crimes.
Shameless Motherfuckers!
byeya
(2,842 posts)who said these guys are mobsters.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)The members don't actually have to be old or boys, just connected. Heh heh heh.
"Dear Mr. Greenspan, I think you're pretty terrific ... " -- Tim Geithner at the 2006 FOMC meeting
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/19/follies-at-the-fed/
Enrique
(27,461 posts)for example when he decided to blow off Obama's order to study breaking up the banks?
I wonder if Jack Lew will hear about Geithner's good fortune?
vinny9698
(1,016 posts)That's how the game is played. Will be played until something is done. Board of Directors give each other bonuses and set their own salaries regardless of their performance.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)"when he decided to blow off Obama's order to study breaking up the banks"!?!?!?
Here's how it works, Enrique. The president appoints someone to his cabinet and the president can remove any cabinet member who doesn't follow orders.
Most likely scenario: "Hey Tim, I'm going to get some PR/cover by "ordering" you to "study" breaking up the banks." Wink-wink, nudge-nudge.
And of course it's yet another and classic level of political stall and delay of actually taking any action by commissioning a "study".
Also a classic move by politicians to further shake down big corporate donors by commissioning a study of some issue which would impact their profits.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)in hindsight, I should have put gigantic quote marks around "ordered" because i agree with everything you said.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)and still keep the job? Probably because the "order" was a joke at best.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)basis. We need a law that prohibits our former government employees regardless of their position from profiting from the decisions they make and favors they do in office.
It is downright disgusting.
This is done on credit. The government officials and even bureaucrats perform favors while in office and then collect their fees or pay offs once they leave.
It's disgusting.
Of course, even worse are those that capitalize on the inside knowledge they get as "public servants" to inside trade on the stock market while still serving in office or to make sure that bills that will provide income to their husband's or other family member's companies pass.
Why do we accept this corruption? This makes for extremely dishonest government.
No wonder they want to put us under surveillance.
They want to know what we know about their wrongdoing and deals. So they want to know what we read and with whom we communicate.
Sorry to be so suspicious and negative. But the surveillance disclosures have made me more cynical than ever about our government and the American press.
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)it isn't any wonder.
A good reporter would not get good sources. They would be silenced from the get-go.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)And those can pay hundreds of thousands each per year, what with stock options, etc. We expect PA Gov. Corbett has lined up directorships with Big Fracking, and the special interests he's trying to privatize state services to (like operating the Turnpike and taking over the state liquor stores).
snot
(10,529 posts)& bookmarked.
East Coast Pirate
(775 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)I was thinking about another guy, a chessmaster.
He's brilliant, they tell me.
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)but that is nothing new for most of them.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)prosecute bankers? Because they themselves are getting paid.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)Oh, for that Old West style justice. (sigh)
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)One of them, at any rate.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)here's maternal uncle...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Moore_%28State_Department_official%29
moores = ford motor, banking & government.
geithners = real estate, banking, and government.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)I've always thought this was The Geithner Plan to "save the banks".
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)There's no way that a speech can be worth that much. This is a paycheck with a flimsy cover story.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Of course the President had no clue that this kind of thing would happen, or about how anything ever works for that matter.
& R