Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

boston bean

(36,222 posts)
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 03:16 PM Jul 2013

The prosecution should have asked

That gym owner, if the fact that, soft wimpy Georgie, having a loaded gun, emboldened him to get out of his car, and pursue some, alleged, fucking punk asshole.

The prosecution did a bad job.

And I'm still pissed.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The prosecution should have asked (Original Post) boston bean Jul 2013 OP
Assuming that the Prosecution could have COLGATE4 Jul 2013 #1
I'm increasingly of the mind that they botched the trial. Decoy of Fenris Jul 2013 #2
They could have asked that but a defense objection would have prevented it from being answered. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #3
At least the point would have been heard. IMHO. nt boston bean Jul 2013 #4

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
1. Assuming that the Prosecution could have
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 03:37 PM
Jul 2013

asked that question, what makes you think that the Gym owner would have any reliable knowledge upon which to answer?

 

Decoy of Fenris

(1,954 posts)
2. I'm increasingly of the mind that they botched the trial.
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 03:39 PM
Jul 2013

More and more, I'm seeing corroborative evidence that indicates that Zimmerman was a premeditated aggressor, not just a standard 2nd degree case. The scene, the timeline, none of it adds up to even the Prosecution's case.

It's just weird.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The prosecution should ha...