 43 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Let's ban the word "gun" from DU (Original post) |
MannyGoldstein | Jul 2013 | OP |
| AllINeedIsCoffee | Jul 2013 | #1 | |
| Agnosticsherbet | Jul 2013 | #2 | |
| The Straight Story | Jul 2013 | #3 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Jul 2013 | #8 | |
| The Straight Story | Jul 2013 | #13 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Jul 2013 | #16 | |
| The Straight Story | Jul 2013 | #18 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Jul 2013 | #23 | |
| felix_numinous | Jul 2013 | #38 | |
| Iggo | Jul 2013 | #4 | |
| billh58 | Jul 2013 | #5 | |
| Hoyt | Jul 2013 | #6 | |
| onehandle | Jul 2013 | #7 | |
| BainsBane | Jul 2013 | #9 | |
| Fumesucker | Jul 2013 | #33 | |
| BainsBane | Jul 2013 | #34 | |
| Safetykitten | Jul 2013 | #10 | |
| forestpath | Jul 2013 | #11 | |
| ceonupe | Jul 2013 | #12 | |
| MotherPetrie | Jul 2013 | #14 | |
| awoke_in_2003 | Jul 2013 | #15 | |
| otohara | Jul 2013 | #17 | |
| rrneck | Jul 2013 | #19 | |
| tblue | Jul 2013 | #20 | |
| AnotherMcIntosh | Jul 2013 | #21 | |
| Mojorabbit | Jul 2013 | #25 | |
| DonCoquixote | Jul 2013 | #42 | |
| Skip Intro | Jul 2013 | #22 | |
| Oldtimeralso | Jul 2013 | #27 | |
| Mojorabbit | Jul 2013 | #24 | |
| WovenGems | Jul 2013 | #26 | |
| flvegan | Jul 2013 | #28 | |
| Fumesucker | Jul 2013 | #35 | |
| Peaceplace80 | Jul 2013 | #29 | |
| ConcernedCanuk | Jul 2013 | #30 | |
| Nanjing to Seoul | Jul 2013 | #31 | |
| DeSwiss | Jul 2013 | #32 | |
| Dragonfli | Jul 2013 | #36 | |
| ShawnRIN | Jul 2013 | #37 | |
| S.A.M | Jul 2013 | #39 | |
| billh58 | Jul 2013 | #40 | |
| cherokeeprogressive | Jul 2013 | #41 | |
| Eleanors38 | Dec 2013 | #43 |
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:34 PM
2. Henceforth, "shit multipliers" will be used to refer to lead acceleration devices.
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:36 PM
3. Meh. Lets ban all guns. Start with the military and police first (they are, after all, folks like us
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #8)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:55 PM
13. True. When my son was in Iraq we trusted him with a gun
Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Reply #16)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 10:23 PM
18. Probably because they use their weapons more to harm people
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:41 PM
billh58 (6,591 posts)
5. +100
|
Good call...
 |
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:47 PM
BainsBane (52,406 posts)
9. There are all kinds of shit multipliers
Response to Fumesucker (Reply #33)
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 02:09 AM
BainsBane (52,406 posts)
34. I agree with the sentiment
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 09:55 PM
awoke_in_2003 (34,582 posts)
15. I like it. nt
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 10:34 PM
20. And Concealed Carry => Sneaky Shit Multipliers
  Good idea, Manny! |
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 10:47 PM
22. I wonder if Obama should ban the Secret Service from carrying guns?
|
Set an example.
 |
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:09 PM
24. It is part of our culture. Not mentioning it will not make it disappear.
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sat Jul 20, 2013, 11:37 PM
28. "Shit multiplier" is a good term to use for some DUers.
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 12:58 AM
32. Okay.....
|
...but if that's the new name for guns you've got your work cut out for you to find new names for all that other shit we've got.
 - Here's a few weapons from DARPA you can start with:
And a few more. K&R |
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 03:06 AM
36. Big Jim's been drinkin' whiskey And playin' poker on a losin' night...
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
Sun Jul 21, 2013, 06:21 AM
37. Agree with the value of specifying the language but not that one
