Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo I found a perfect target for Anonymous to hack...
http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-07-25/congress-will-keep-senators-tax-reform-wishes-secret-for-50-yearsCongress Will Keep Senators' Tax Reform Wishes Secretfor 50 Years
Today The Hill reports that Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who head the Senate Finance Committee and are working on a complete rewrite of the U.S. tax code, have assured their colleagues that any of their requests to preserve a loophole will be kept secret by the National Archives for 50 years. The details of the story, all true, read as if they were dreamed up by a 10-year-old after watching Thunderball: Each submission will also be given its own ID number and be kept on password-protected servers, with printed versions kept in locked safes, The Hill writes. Until 2064.
It isnt clear who holds the key to the safes, or whether, as in a nuclear silo, there are two key-holders to prevent actions of conscience. Or whether the server will be protected with a password that must contain at least one number and one capital letter. Or whether that password will be written down, and if so, if that paper will be troweled into the repairs underway on the Washington Monument.
An aide explained to The Hill that Baucus and Hatchs promise of 50 years of secrecy is standard operating procedure for sensitive materials including investigation materials. Tax negotiations, thenCongresss basic constitutional responsibilityare to be held to the same standard of secrecy as the investigation of the Warren Commission.
Secrecy is a feature of our democracy. Sausage is gross, and backroom deals are necessary. But these secrets, the scraps of paper on which Senators write their wishes, vouchsafed in a hope chest at the National Archives, are so precious that they cant even be trusted to a back room. Senators are scared. Some tax loopholes are just indefensible to voters. There is no way to pretend that they help our kids, or jobs. They just go to people and companies that donate money. Thats what this secrecy is for. The only possible reason for it to exist is to prevent senators from having to defend their choices to the public.
Today The Hill reports that Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who head the Senate Finance Committee and are working on a complete rewrite of the U.S. tax code, have assured their colleagues that any of their requests to preserve a loophole will be kept secret by the National Archives for 50 years. The details of the story, all true, read as if they were dreamed up by a 10-year-old after watching Thunderball: Each submission will also be given its own ID number and be kept on password-protected servers, with printed versions kept in locked safes, The Hill writes. Until 2064.
It isnt clear who holds the key to the safes, or whether, as in a nuclear silo, there are two key-holders to prevent actions of conscience. Or whether the server will be protected with a password that must contain at least one number and one capital letter. Or whether that password will be written down, and if so, if that paper will be troweled into the repairs underway on the Washington Monument.
An aide explained to The Hill that Baucus and Hatchs promise of 50 years of secrecy is standard operating procedure for sensitive materials including investigation materials. Tax negotiations, thenCongresss basic constitutional responsibilityare to be held to the same standard of secrecy as the investigation of the Warren Commission.
Secrecy is a feature of our democracy. Sausage is gross, and backroom deals are necessary. But these secrets, the scraps of paper on which Senators write their wishes, vouchsafed in a hope chest at the National Archives, are so precious that they cant even be trusted to a back room. Senators are scared. Some tax loopholes are just indefensible to voters. There is no way to pretend that they help our kids, or jobs. They just go to people and companies that donate money. Thats what this secrecy is for. The only possible reason for it to exist is to prevent senators from having to defend their choices to the public.
These people are idiots if they truly think their opinion can be hidden for half a century.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 953 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So I found a perfect target for Anonymous to hack... (Original Post)
Gravitycollapse
Aug 2013
OP
Secret government, secret laws, secret courts, secret spying ... what a democracy.
Scuba
Aug 2013
#1
It's better they don't. Anyone that gives a shit can have much more fun imagining it's way worse
brewens
Aug 2013
#2
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. Secret government, secret laws, secret courts, secret spying ... what a democracy.
Initech
(100,068 posts)3. And that's why I will never trust our government.
brewens
(13,582 posts)2. It's better they don't. Anyone that gives a shit can have much more fun imagining it's way worse
than what they really put in there. Some of them probably went pretty far, others not so much.
Squinch
(50,949 posts)4. Kick. If they're ashamed of what they propose, they shouldn't propose it. And we shouldn't vote
for anyone who needs to keep their legislation secret from us.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)5. agreed.