Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 02:08 AM Aug 2013

Is it true to say that the terror warning has caused critics of surveillance to "back off"?

That's what my local NBC affiliate news anchor said on the 6 o'clock news today.

She reported on the continued closure of embassies. And continued by saying that the terror warning has caused critics of the surveillance state to "back off."

She was quite dramatic throughout the whole story.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is it true to say that the terror warning has caused critics of surveillance to "back off"? (Original Post) grasswire Aug 2013 OP
Does that look to be the case here on DU? BainsBane Aug 2013 #1
Wishful thinking. Downwinder Aug 2013 #2
Threat level BROWN, blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #3
But the Quaedas are coming! AgingAmerican Aug 2013 #8
I thought perhaps she was parroting one of the wingnuts. grasswire Aug 2013 #4
Well that would be awfully convenient, wouldn't it? dkf Aug 2013 #5
Social Conditioning by state ran media. nt AppleBottom Aug 2013 #6
It won't silence the average person, but it could 'discourage' all those members of Congress sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #7
"News anchors" don't write their own copy. delrem Aug 2013 #9
it was a local news program grasswire Aug 2013 #13
Not this critic. blackspade Aug 2013 #10
this is why I don't watch news on the tv anymore. They seem to think they get to tell us liberal_at_heart Aug 2013 #11
It was in the NYTimes jakeXT Aug 2013 #12
I don't think so but that is the media narrative laundry_queen Aug 2013 #14
NPR correspondent said as much this a.m. nt Eleanors38 Aug 2013 #15
k * r! n/t wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #16
that's the desired effect imho frylock Aug 2013 #17

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
4. I thought perhaps she was parroting one of the wingnuts.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 02:15 AM
Aug 2013

Limbo or someone. I don't know what the goons are saying today.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
7. It won't silence the average person, but it could 'discourage' all those members of Congress
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 02:48 AM
Aug 2013

who were preparing bills to curtail the excesses of the NSA.

I'm sure they are receiving phone calls suggesting that they might not want to be seen as pro-terrorists should something happen.

Prolonging these 'closings' for a month or more should keep the fear going (for Members of Congress) until they return with their bills.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
9. "News anchors" don't write their own copy.
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 03:26 AM
Aug 2013

They rarely have a critical bone in their bodies.
They are hired for the personas that they've learned to project -- and if they presume to use thought, they are fired.
That's the nature of the market in the MSM.

I think it's better *not* to listen to "the 6 o'clock news on MSM".
Especially so if the listener doesn't already know that the stream of BS is designed to supplement, to nurture, the more hardened pile it lands on.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
13. it was a local news program
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 12:05 PM
Aug 2013

You don't watch your local news? For the weather report, and for local issues?

I do. But not for national news.

How do you keep tabs on what the MSM is telling your neighbors if you don't watch? We all are affected by the community conversation, whether we want to be or not. When we shut ourselves away from the conversation, we skew the audience toward the right. And it keeps skewing and skewing and skewing until there are no moderate or liberal voices represented.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
11. this is why I don't watch news on the tv anymore. They seem to think they get to tell us
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:34 AM
Aug 2013

how we are allowed to think, and I simply refuse to comply.

jakeXT

(10,575 posts)
12. It was in the NYTimes
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 04:36 AM
Aug 2013
But intercepting electronic communications is one of the National Security Agency’s main jobs, as the documents leaked by Edward J. Snowden, a former N.S.A. contractor, have only underscored. At the request of intelligence officials, The New York Times withheld some details about the intercepted communications.

Some analysts and Congressional officials suggested Friday that emphasizing a terrorist threat now was a good way to divert attention from the uproar over the N.S.A.'s data-collection programs, and that if it showed the intercepts had uncovered a possible plot, even better.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/03/world/middleeast/qaeda-messages-prompt-us-terror-warning.html

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
14. I don't think so but that is the media narrative
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 01:26 PM
Aug 2013

There was a lot of "SEE? the NSA is NEEDED! We can't do without it! We must protect it!" on CNN over the weekend.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it true to say that th...