Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(33,575 posts)
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:13 AM Feb 2012

About those Faster Than Light neutrinos...nevermind.

Not the big "stodgy science was wrong" event some claimed.

http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-faster-neutrinos-faulty-wiring.html

Ever since the news came out on September 22 of last year that a team of researchers in Italy had clocked neutrinos traveling faster than the speed of light, the physics world has been resounding with the potential implications of such a discovery — that is, if it were true. The speed of light has been a key component of the standard model of physics for over a century, an Einstein-established limit that particles (even tricky neutrinos) weren’t supposed to be able to break, not even a little.

Now, according to a breaking news article by Edwin Cartlidge on AAAS’ ScienceInsider, the neutrinos may be cleared of any speed violations.

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
About those Faster Than Light neutrinos...nevermind. (Original Post) edhopper Feb 2012 OP
Those what??? Skidmore Feb 2012 #1
corrected immediately edhopper Feb 2012 #3
Damn. There goes my best joke.... FSogol Feb 2012 #2
That's pretty good. edhopper Feb 2012 #4
Why the fuck are people still thinking in three dimensions? HopeHoops Feb 2012 #5
Faster than light edhopper Feb 2012 #6
Einstein was wrong. There is no limit. Think about it, what is outside of the universe? HopeHoops Feb 2012 #10
Do you honestly believe you've had an insight Einstein didn't? tkmorris Feb 2012 #11
Living around the corner from his cottage in Princeton you could meet regular folks who grantcart Feb 2012 #16
He also didn't memorize his phone number on the grounds that he could always look it up. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #20
That's not my own thinking, just a theory I believe to be possible. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #19
It's not hard to have an insight that Einstein didn't have... JHB Feb 2012 #36
Einstein would look at you, make no comment then walk away. nt Javaman Feb 2012 #13
Probably because he wanted a doughnut. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #21
Possibly... Javaman Feb 2012 #22
Or stoned. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #23
okay then... Javaman Feb 2012 #24
No. I still contend that the universe is multi-dimensional by necessity. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #25
okay then... Javaman Feb 2012 #28
It's not three, dammit, it's FOUR!! FOUR!! Bake Feb 2012 #7
Actually it is 17. At least it was during the Big Bang. The fourth is time. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #9
String theory is multi-dimensional metalbot Feb 2012 #29
Yet. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #30
I mean really, look around you. Bake Feb 2012 #32
It's sort of one of those Flatland problems - we know what we directly observe. HopeHoops Feb 2012 #35
I effing told you! Bake Feb 2012 #8
It still made people think a little differently for a while... Javaman Feb 2012 #14
Deep within the science lab... Javaman Feb 2012 #12
The Italians made their measurements cloudbase Feb 2012 #15
Oh, come on now! Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #31
Amazing what some neutrinos will go though just to avoid a speeding ticket. hughee99 Feb 2012 #17
99% of problems lie on the physical layer Taverner Feb 2012 #18
Great thread! ananda Feb 2012 #26
"The bottom line is that we will not know until... stlsaxman Feb 2012 #27
"Every mountain is unclimbable until it is climbed. Every ship is too large to sink until it is sunk LanternWaste Feb 2012 #33
It's not a speed limit. edhopper Feb 2012 #34

FSogol

(45,484 posts)
2. Damn. There goes my best joke....
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:31 AM
Feb 2012

"We don’t allow faster than light neutrinos in here, said the bartender. A neutrino walks into a bar."

edhopper

(33,575 posts)
4. That's pretty good.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 10:34 AM
Feb 2012

How about;
"We don’t allow faster than light neutrinos in here, said the physicist. A neutrino walks into an Italian super-collider."

edhopper

(33,575 posts)
6. Faster than light
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:04 PM
Feb 2012

is counter to Relativity. Space is compressed to a singularity at light speed. Einstein did not think in 3 dimensions.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
10. Einstein was wrong. There is no limit. Think about it, what is outside of the universe?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:40 PM
Feb 2012

My personal opinion is that the extension of the universe is finite and it feeds back into the core. It can't be infinite without something that's not included. This isn't a 3-dimensional way of viewing things and while Einstein was brilliant, he never reached that point in thinking in any of his works.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
16. Living around the corner from his cottage in Princeton you could meet regular folks who
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:13 PM
Feb 2012

actually knew the guy. There were a lot of story's about how unorganized he was, walking out in his pajamas one day and so on.

Here are some examples;


When Albert Einstein was working in Princeton university,
one day he was going back home he forgot his home address.
The driver of the cab did not recognize him.
Einstein asked the driver if he knows Einstein’s home.
The driver said “Who does not know Einstein’s address?
Everyone in Princeton knows.
Do you want to meet him?”.
Einstein replied “I am Einstein.
I forgot my home address, can you take me there? ”
The driver reached him to his home and did not even collect his fare from him .

============ ========= ========= ========= ========= =========

Einstein was once travelling from Princeton on a train when the conductor came down the aisle,
punching the tickets of every passenger.
When he came to Einstein,
Einstein reached in his vest pocket.
He couldn’t find his ticket,
so he reached in his trouser pockets.
It wasn’t there, so he looked in his briefcase but couldn’t find it.
Then he looked in the seat beside him.
He still couldn’t find it.
The conductor said,
‘Dr. Einstein, I know who you are.
We all know who you are.
I’m sure you bought a ticket.
Don’t worry about it.’
Einstein nodded appreciatively.
The conductor continued down the aisle punching tickets.
As he was ready to move to the next car,
he turned around and saw the great physicist
down on his hands and knees
looking under his seat for his ticket.
The conductor rushed back and said,
‘Dr. Einstein, Dr. Einstein, don’t worry,
I know who you are. No problem.
You don’t need a ticket.
I’m sure you bought one.’
Einstein looked at him and said,
‘Young man, I too, know who I am.

What I don’t know is where I’m going. That’s why I am searching my ticket”


So just about everyone has had an insight that Einstein didn't have, lol.

Listening to these stories made this very great man even more loveable.

JHB

(37,160 posts)
36. It's not hard to have an insight that Einstein didn't have...
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 11:11 AM
Feb 2012

...the tough part is being able to back it up with a theoretical framework that can be tested. Most insights don't get that far, having stopped at the pub and stayed there.

Javaman

(62,528 posts)
24. okay then...
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:19 AM
Feb 2012

by that statement I can only draw the conclusion that you believe your original statement was crazy as well.

nothing like wasting a lot of electronic ink, huh?

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
25. No. I still contend that the universe is multi-dimensional by necessity.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:24 AM
Feb 2012

And for that matter, Einstein rejected Newtonian physics as "incomplete" also. He didn't have access to computers or social-networking sites. Consider what he was working with to create those theories. The Mandelbrot set was first plotted on a 9-pin dot matrix printer in 1980 and yet it was based on the work of Julia from 1917!!! The Mandelbrot set is, in the simplest terms, a mapping of the Julia sets that are connected. I doubt Julia ever had time to date, much less get laid.

Javaman

(62,528 posts)
28. okay then...
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:02 AM
Feb 2012

have fun with your theories.

let me know when your peer reviewed article is published.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
7. It's not three, dammit, it's FOUR!! FOUR!!
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:12 PM
Feb 2012

Got to put time in there! Anything else, a la the string theorists, is just to make their mathematics work!



Bake

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
9. Actually it is 17. At least it was during the Big Bang. The fourth is time.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:36 PM
Feb 2012

And even THAT one is questionable. Time out here on the outskirts is far slower than time near the "center", if you can call it that. We can't transcend Newtonian physics without moving into multi-dimensional thinking. I'm not by any means an expert in the field, but I can't understand why they haven't figured that out yet.

metalbot

(1,058 posts)
29. String theory is multi-dimensional
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:17 AM
Feb 2012

The problem is, even if you can create a unified model that is mathematically consistent by introducing additional dimensions, that isn't verifiable since we have no mechanism for making measurements outside of space and time.

Bake

(21,977 posts)
32. I mean really, look around you.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 01:07 PM
Feb 2012

Space. You've got length, width, depth. Up, down, forward, back. Add time for the "when." what else do you have?

Other dimension? Where are they? Maybe my brain's too small, but adding dimensions just to make the math works is kinda like cheating.

Bottom line, I don't think the string theorists have the answer.

Bake

Javaman

(62,528 posts)
14. It still made people think a little differently for a while...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:02 PM
Feb 2012

and for that, it served its purpose.

Cheers.

Javaman

(62,528 posts)
12. Deep within the science lab...
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 12:59 PM
Feb 2012

Science dude #1: that was some cool ass shit! Kegger!!

Science dude #2: wait a second.

Science dude #1: beers ordered. wait, what?

Science dude #2: this cable doesn't seem to be plugged in.

Science dude #1: but I ordered the beer!

Science dude #1: okay, let's first party, then appologize.

Science dude #2: you so totally rock!

cloudbase

(5,513 posts)
15. The Italians made their measurements
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:05 PM
Feb 2012

using Veglia instruments.

Those of you who've owned Fiats or Moto Guzzis, and perhaps other Italian machinery, will know.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
31. Oh, come on now!
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 10:34 AM
Feb 2012

Veglia insrumentality was considered precise to within at least thirty per cent of actuality...when they worked at all, that is.


Don't start in on Lucas Electrics, ok?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
17. Amazing what some neutrinos will go though just to avoid a speeding ticket.
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 01:14 PM
Feb 2012

the old "faulty radar gun" defense.

stlsaxman

(9,236 posts)
27. "The bottom line is that we will not know until...
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 09:25 AM
Feb 2012

more measurements are done later this year," Gillies told The Associated Press.

ubtil then I'll root for them pesky neutrinos.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
33. "Every mountain is unclimbable until it is climbed. Every ship is too large to sink until it is sunk
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 01:12 PM
Feb 2012

"Every mountain is unclimbable until it is climbed. Every ship is too large to sink until it is sunk." Add to that I imagine, every speed limit cannot be broken... until it is broken.

edhopper

(33,575 posts)
34. It's not a speed limit.
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 03:26 PM
Feb 2012

It is the basis for the relativistic model of the Universe, This is not a mechanical engineering problem.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About those Faster Than L...