General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums10 Things Transphobes Say That Make Me *Facepalm*
(snip)
3. Girls have XX chromosomes, boys have XY chromosomes. Period.
Unless you have Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS). Or an XO karyotype. Or XXY. Or XYY. Or 5-alpha-reductase deficiency. Or Swyer syndrome. Or genetic mosaicism. Or 17-β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase III deficiency. Or Progestin-induced virilisation... etc...
You know, lots of community colleges these days have good intro to biology courses available.
(snip)
6. Psychologists and psychiatrists are just a bunch of Godless liberals who tell people what they want to hear and push diagnoses.
Yes, because finding out for certain I am trans has made my life so much easier. Because therapists get paid to tell people what they want to hear. Because it in no way shape or form violates their professional ethics to tell people things which are highly likely to make them attempt suicide.
Oh, and my therapist? She's a Catholic republican.
(snip)
9. Calling transgender people "its"
When you resort to calling people non-human, or sub-human, you're treading on dangerous ground. I don't care if I am breaking Godwin's law here because every time I hear about transgender people being called "it," the hair the back of my neck stands up. Reducing human beings to something with no value is a hallmark of propaganda used in genocide. "Plague carrying rats" for Jews in Germany. "Cockroaches" for Tutsis in Rwanda. Darfurians were systemically referred to as "slaves".
When transgender people are labeled "it" and as predators upon women and children, it should make your skin crawl too.
More at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brynn-tannehill/transphobes_b_3780432.html
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)JackBeck
(12,359 posts)That meme makes my blood boil.
mockmonkey
(2,815 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Gosh...it seemed like a nice day and ...what the hell....
JackBeck
(12,359 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)...changing or changes, that that would be one of them.
Rather like "Well...if you're a man, why would you want to change to a woman ???"
or "If you are a man, why would you want to date another man"
My answer would be "They change so some dumb-fuck can ask stupid questions"
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,284 posts)But what you are describing is ignorance and hatred, not phobia.
ashling
(25,771 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,284 posts)calimary
(81,238 posts)Truly! NOTHING phobic about it. It's not about fear. Hell, it's NOT going to rub off on you or stain your clothing or spoil your food, and it isn't contagious!!! You're simply an asshole.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)calimary
(81,238 posts)Self-loathing propels a lot of other hatred, she said, her mind racing directly toward teabagger-ville...
Number23
(24,544 posts)tom_kelly
(959 posts)You've made your points and agreed/disagreed with others. You're not going to change the way others refer to him/her and it shouldn't ruin your mood either way. If Manning was a personal friend of mine I would certainly refer to him the way he prefers. He is not a personal friend of mine and when I refer to him as a he its because he's a male. It seems as though some DUer's worlds have fallen apart because of this.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)although of course there will be those that cling to their bigotry till the bitter end
tom_kelly
(959 posts)I just don't know why you're making this out to be such a big deal. It seams that every fourth thread is about members (not you specifically) wanting other members to recognize Mannings current desire by blessing it in their opinions. Drop it! You've made your point, now stop posting about it. You're the one labeling other members as bigots. Good job!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Your contention is that you have a right to use words about minorities that they consider to be hurtful slurs. Your stance is no different than that of white people who refused to stop saying 'colored people' out of a sense of tradition or claimed annoyance at being asked to change. I'm not saying you'd use that term, but I am saying your argument is absolutely identical to the arguments made by others who have clung to many other words that became unacceptable to society.
And with that I wish you a more enlightened tomorrow.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Hope you don't mind I cut and pasted it to someone who needed to hear this.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)about your right to calling manning any gender you like?
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)Imagine someone telling someone else what they can post - right down to what pronouns they're allowed to use!!!
Who would DO such a thing?!?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts).... out of a sense of tradition or claimed annoyance at being asked to change. I'm not saying you'd use that term, but I am saying your argument is absolutely identical to the arguments made by others who have clung to many other words that became unacceptable to society.
copied from a brilliant DUer upthread- but this applies to you as well. The nerve, indeed. Your stripes are showing.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 25, 2013, 05:35 PM - Edit history (1)
"I am saying your argument is absolutely identical ..."What 'argument' was that?
My post didn't put forward any argument or stance. It merely commented on a certain poster's hypocrisy in telling people they shouldn't dictate what others post, when the poster in question does so on a regular basis.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)or an apologist.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Not shocked to see that.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)just like if you were called a Canadian when you consider yourself an American.
freeplessinseattle
(3,508 posts)It is interesting that other popular topics of the moment don't get as much as backlash and pleas to stop posting.
Did it bother you when the Trayvon Martin case was getting a lot of threads, for instance, with various people expressing themselves? Or the Sandy Hook tragedy (or any gun related tragedy).
Gun related topical stories, for instance, often generate numerous threads by different people that can say essentially the same thing, but from their own perspective and individual desire to express. Yet I don't think I've seen anyone request, much less demand, that certain topics be dropped, since there are just too many darn threads about the same thing.
The only time I've seen that happen is when there's some fluff like topic, about some celebrity or something, and a plea to take it to the lounge. This particular issue concerns our fellow DUers, who have every right to express themselves and help to enlighten others. Isn't that what the heart of DU is all about?
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)friends along with foes.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)Is that so fucking difficult for you? Lots of people legally change their name. Do you insist on calling them only by the name on their birth certificate?
Why are you so concerned about the contents of her pants? Do you honestly expect that she would want to be naked around you?
As to why people are up in arms, it's for the same reason we don't just keep quiet when someone says "nigger". Referring to a transgender person by anything other than the pronoun they prefer is offensive.
tom_kelly
(959 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)By your own logic you probably shouldn't.
Synthesize
(19 posts)In your own personal life you are more likely to acquiesce to the requests/demands of someone you like vs someone you don't.
Many dislike Manning on principle and any chance to stick it to him...
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Ask Chad Ocho Cinco or The Artist Formerly Known as Prince.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He changed that name back! http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/ochocinco-no-more-chad-johnson-changes-name-back-182832401--nfl.html
And Prince Rogers Nelson, AKA Prince, AKA The Artist Formerly Known as Prince, AKA The Artist, is back to using the "Prince" label once more: http://www.ask.com/wiki/Prince_(musician)
As for Manning, you can call her Chelsea in conversation, but if you're sending a letter, you need to address it to Bradley, otherwise it will be returned to sender.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/22/bradley-manning-woman-chelsea-gender-reassignment
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)JackBeck
(12,359 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)When someone goes out of their way to reject a trans person's preferred pronoun or reserve the right to relabel them out of spite, it feels like a slur. People are taking this personally. And this has little to do with Chelsea Manning. The thing with slurs? They are targeted at whole groups, not just the individual. People are telling you this is hurtful- not to Chelsea Manning, but to them or their loved ones or the LGTB community. Is it that important to you that you'd need to persist?
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)that website appreciates folk like you
tblue37
(65,340 posts)close personal friend of yours?
Zorra
(27,670 posts)conservatives.
It's just who we are, and what we do.
If we didn't do these things, you would not have any rights whatsoever, and would be groveling at the feet of a king.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)insist on making posts like this
This is not "disagreement" - as long as you insist on using "him" and "he" (after someone explains Chelsea prefers "her" and "she" you are FLAT OUT WRONG and engaging in HATEFUL BIGOTRY
tom_kelly
(959 posts)I apologize to everyone for my ignorance and insensitivity. Its become clear to me that I need to do some inward work on myself. I'm sorry.
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)For instance, my personal therapist refused to face the fact that I am bisexual and would often enquire about any possible women I'm dating all the while ignoring the possibility that I might be dating a man.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)JackBeck
(12,359 posts)Most cisgender folks' heads would explode if they took a minute to think that at some point in their lives, they probably shared a bathroom with someone who was trans.
tblue37
(65,340 posts)simply because she was born male, though she always knew she was female?
(Jenna Talackova was Miss Canada in the Miss Universe contest.)
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)I find the XY chromosome argument particularly idiotic.
They are trying to make an argument about something they don't even understand. They don't get genotype or phenotype. They don't understand all the various cases where people don't fall neatly into the male or female label.
They want everything in the world falls neatly into defined categories so they don't have to think, and assume it works that way and try to use biology as an argument. When IF THEY DID THE SLIGHTEST BIT OF RESEARCH they would see that is not how it works.
Not by a long shot.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)for fun growing up, I had a weird childhood, and I find it to be one of the most idiotic arguments.
snot
(10,524 posts)Yesterday, a person helped me in store. The person was wearing the same unisex uniform as the other clerks, and to me looked basically female but styled in a rather male way, with a very short haircut, no make-up, and breasts seemingly de-emphasized; the main reason I assumed s/he was physically female was the total lack of beard. I really wasn't thinking about the person's gender, but when I spoke to another person waiting in line to let him know that a clerk was available, I found myself saying "She's open."
After all the discussion on DU lately, I immediately worried about which pronoun I should have used; but the person's appearance seemed genuinely ambiguous to me. S/he was also wearing small, stud earrings also ambiguous these days.
In short, it seems like whichever way I go "he" or "she" I could be offending someone.
I don't suppose there's any reliable, general guidance about what to do in these situations, but advice is welcome.
JackBeck
(12,359 posts)if I received good service.
There are many gender queer people who don't ascribe to the gender binary of male or female. Asking someone's name is a good start.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)number has no social significance whereas gender does. so in that particular case i would have said "they're open" "that line is open"
snot
(10,524 posts)I think in this particular situation, this would have been the best, most practicable solution.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)Problem solved.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)We may not have enough human pronouns to describe every situation, but suggesting that TG people are non-human is factually wrong and cruel.
The "God made..." thing is religious bigotry. How do you know I share your religious views?
mick063
(2,424 posts)A woman that had me very fooled for about a week. Perhaps a bad way to phrase it, but regardless, I was completely unaware. I had to be "told" about it.
My first day working with her, she thanked me profusely for "talking with her". I didn't quite get the point at the time. I only worked with her for about 2 months, but in that time, I saw a few emotional moments of unexplained sadness. I didn't delve into why, but I did feel empathy.
Otherwise, she was a good ambassador for her circumstance. Very professional. Charming, with sense of humor as well.
If for not being told by another coworker, I would have never suspected. Almost all of the people in my work group openly accepted her. Almost. Those that didn't were privately concerned that communication must be guarded to ward attention from human resources. They couldn't "be themselves".
mythology
(9,527 posts)I worked with a guy who was significantly visually impaired and he was so well adapted that I didn't realize until I sat at his computer and realized it was set up with accessibility software. I felt a little foolish at first until I realized that it meant he was able to do all of the things he needed to do. I was even more impressed when I heard the unemployment rate for blind or visually impaired people is in the 50 to 60% range.
Obviously being blind or visually impaired isn't the same as being transgendered, but neither one is easy and there's no reason for anybody to go out of their way to be an ass. Referring to somebody else as an it, yeah you're just showing everybody you suck as a human being.
I suffer from depression, don't like myself and have a body that is unwilling to do the things I ask of it physically and I can't even imagine how hard it must be to feel like you're in the wrong body especially in a society that is (at best) only still learning to understand/accept transgendered people.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Particularly transgender women who are in transition, who don't "pass", and/or don't care if they "pass". They have a target on their backs, and most conservatives consider them fair game. Add the general misogyny of conservatives to this mix as well.
She is also hyper-aware that some people she works with can't "be themselves", and more than likely knows exactly who those people are. When people are different, and are exposed to constant irrational threat from other people, they often develop extreme sensitivity to their surroundings, and to the physical mannerisms, such as body language, and speech/tone of voice, of the people around them.
This may explain some, or all, of the sadness you perceived.
Always being consider as something "other", and being exposed to chronic direct or indirect senseless mockery or hatred, would have a tendency to make any rational person sad at times, with regard to the state of consciousness of far too many of their fellow human beings.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Please don't leave us. I know you're active and get real things done. It's wonderful. And if you just don't have the time for DU I understand. But you make a real difference here. If nothing else you should know that.
Granny M
(1,395 posts)I agree - please don''t leave, Jack Beck.
Your post was truthful and intelligent. I agreed completely with what you said. I have one trans friend and, believe me, she did not choose this. It's the biological reality for her. I only wish she didn't face so much prejudice from ignorant people.
I support Chelsea Manning. She has suffered too much crap already, and has an unnecessarily hard road ahead of her.
Turbineguy
(37,324 posts)for their ignorance, this could be a teachable moment. Just because somebody reads and posts on DU does not automatically make them an expert on this subject. And yet it is a very reachable audience.