Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsthe debate is not in mannings pants
its in the ever expanding spy state and how to saddle break that bronco
which ever side of the pronoun issue you fall into stop being diverted from the issue
if the debate is diverted then everything manning has and will go through is for nothing
that is called winning at the NSA
thank you for your time
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 567 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
the debate is not in mannings pants (Original Post)
SwampG8r
Aug 2013
OP
I noticed how DU suddenly turned into a gender "debate", if you will, and the surviellance state was
silvershadow
Aug 2013
#1
Indeed they are. I just don't want to lose sight of the surveillance issue, however important the
silvershadow
Aug 2013
#3
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)1. I noticed how DU suddenly turned into a gender "debate", if you will, and the surviellance state was
pushed right off the front page...I started to post about it earlier. Kick.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)2. both issues are important.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)3. Indeed they are. I just don't want to lose sight of the surveillance issue, however important the
gender issue is (that's all I meant by my post).
napoleon_in_rags
(3,991 posts)4. Its really good to look at the big picture here
Manning's rights, and why they were taken. I believe he is entitled to the treatment if he really wants it, even if its paid for by himself/family. But let's not forget that if he is denied this, its part of a much bigger picture.