Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,064 posts)
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 02:45 PM Aug 2013

Democratic Push For Voting Reform In All 50 States Has GOP Frothing At The Mouth

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/08/21/democrats-take-charge-push-in-50-states-for-voting-reforms/

Democratic Push For Voting Reform In All 50 States Has GOP Frothing At The Mouth
Author: Deborah Montesano August 21, 2013 10:06 am


The GOP may have out-foxed itself on the voting rights issue. Having maneuvered for years to achieve their dream of a conservative U.S. Supreme Court, they were thrilled with the SCOTUS decision in June that seemed to gut enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. What they probably didn’t anticipate was that the Democratic Party would be spurred to find a solution, and fast — a fact they might have tuned into were they not so allergic to the word “solutions.”

Last week, a 50-state initiative was rolled out by a new nonprofit organization run by Michael Sargeant, the executive director of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee. The group takes back language co-opted by conservatives, naming itself American Values First. The intent of the group is to push voting reforms that will make it a whole lot easier for all who are eligible to vote.

First of all, Democrats will push states to adopt legislation that requires all elections to be conducted by mail. Colorado finalized such a law early this year. Washington and Oregon already hold all-mail elections. The result in those two states was stunning. Before the change in their laws, both were considered swing states. Since enactment of vote-by-mail legislation, they’ve become solidly blue.

Secondly, Dems will push for states to enact universal registration, putting the responsibility for registration on state governments — for instance, by tying automatic registration of eligible voters to issuing drivers’ licenses. Such a bill failed by just one vote in Oregon last year. Rep. Lew Frederick, D-Portland, will reintroduce it in January, 2014. He said:

”It’s a pretty simple bill. Unlike some of the Republican efforts, there’s actually a problem to be solved. This is not something we’re making up.”

Ah, solutions–anathema to Republican ears! The idea of automatic, universal registration is an awesome one to most anyone else. As the Sacramento Bee recently pointed out, nearly a quarter of eligible voters in this country — 51 million people — aren’t registered. Of course, their ranks are made up largely of the poor, the young, and racial minorities. Combine automatic registration with receiving ballots by mail and elections become a whole other ball game — free of any doubts about fraud; instead, empowering those who’ve had the most difficulty exercising their civic duty. No one can make voters vote, but relieving the stress and hardship involved can bring a whole lot more of them into the process.

snip//


The GOP couldn’t be more transparent about their real concern — and it isn’t voter fraud. Their attempts at voter suppression add up to a naked power grab. However, the equation is about to change. Democrats are fighting back.

Republicans’ new focus should be on avoiding a total flush of their party down the toilet. The 50-state initiative has the potential to capitalize on the same outrage over voter suppression that drove people to the polls in 2012, when an anticipated victory was snatched from snapping, greedy, Republican jaws. This time, let’s just flush them back into the sewer from whence they came!
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic Push For Voting Reform In All 50 States Has GOP Frothing At The Mouth (Original Post) babylonsister Aug 2013 OP
I don't know. I like election day. I like going into town and voting. cali Aug 2013 #1
And people who don't have drivers' licenses? MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #3
Here in Ohio, to vote by mail one must put the last four numbers of your SSI... WCGreen Aug 2013 #9
The homeless are more likely to line up for a polling place than to use a drop box? Bluenorthwest Aug 2013 #6
You can not register to vote without providing an address. Bandit Aug 2013 #12
Thank you for your contribution. Enthusiast Aug 2013 #16
exactly! Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #19
In Oregon there are ways for people to go vote despite being a vote by mail state Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #18
my wife and I had issues with delayed ballot arrival so we got to experience election day voting Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #20
Here's Their Facebook Page - Needs Some Love otohara Aug 2013 #2
I would hope Dems are fighting back Cha Aug 2013 #4
LOL @ GOP tricks. Vote by mail has worked very well. The repukes have tried to undermine it... freshwest Aug 2013 #5
Thank you, my dear freshwest! CaliforniaPeggy Aug 2013 #11
And I was still unable to vote until I was 21. We did it for the future. freshwest Aug 2013 #14
This Makes So Much Sense colsohlibgal Aug 2013 #7
I guess that's a problem in Ohio. Not in my state. Join up and make the party as you want. freshwest Aug 2013 #15
Also, the Supreme Court left Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act intact Tx4obama Aug 2013 #8
That's how it's going to have to be done--across the board.I'm for the 50 state strategy even now.nt Hekate Aug 2013 #10
The 50 state strategy was one of the smartest things the Party ever did. winter is coming Aug 2013 #13
KICK! Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #17
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. I don't know. I like election day. I like going into town and voting.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 02:47 PM
Aug 2013

and what about people who are homeless?

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
9. Here in Ohio, to vote by mail one must put the last four numbers of your SSI...
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 07:50 PM
Aug 2013

Or your driving License, military papers or any government papers, utility bills or a W-2 or pay check to prove where you live.

Right now, I am downloading my absentee ballot application.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
6. The homeless are more likely to line up for a polling place than to use a drop box?
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 05:44 PM
Aug 2013

2010 the year they say turn out was so low that Baggers took over Congress, Oregon had record setting midterm turnout. That's pretty basic stuff.
And in return for the wonders of the polling place experience you could have a voting party at home, BYOB Bring Your Own Ballot.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
12. You can not register to vote without providing an address.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 08:27 PM
Aug 2013

Ballots will be sent to that address. It is about time Democrats woke up. Republicans have been sending absentee ballots to their registered voters for decades and it has improved their turn-out considerably. In the event one is between addresses or truly homeless there will still be open ballot boxes on election day.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
18. In Oregon there are ways for people to go vote despite being a vote by mail state
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 02:00 AM
Aug 2013

It is not impossible for someone who is homeless to vote. It may just take a bit more effort like most things for homeless people do, unfortunately.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
20. my wife and I had issues with delayed ballot arrival so we got to experience election day voting
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 02:02 AM
Aug 2013

we showed up at the elections office with our son in Portland, filled out our ballots after showing ID, and turned them in right there. I even filled it out standing at one of the old voter booths.

You can even get an "I voted" sticker.

Cha

(297,196 posts)
4. I would hope Dems are fighting back
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 04:44 PM
Aug 2013
"No one can make voters vote, but relieving the stress and hardship involved can bring a whole lot more of them into the process."

Yeah! Creepy gops.. always trying to make it harder to vote because they don't have anything to offer but suppression.

Mahalo babylonsistah!



h/t babylonsistah http://www.democraticunderground.com/110214137

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
5. LOL @ GOP tricks. Vote by mail has worked very well. The repukes have tried to undermine it...
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 05:06 PM
Aug 2013

By sending out blatant lies and distortions in the mail, pretending their candidates are not part of their cancerous brand, and even gone to the houses of people to 'pick up and mail their votes for them' FFS.



That was outright fraud. Also tried to get people to give them their ballots in other ways to toss in the garbage, no doubt. They have targeted voters from the public records that voted for Democrats in the past because they don't want their voices heard. The GOP shriek loudly about their First Amendment rights when they stomp around to shut others up so their voices aren't heard. Guess we should not be surprised at their stopping people from speaking with their vote.

But I have an suggestion to add into such bills as the one in Oregon. Since the NCLB, the federal government has used student information to recruit for the military. Why not use it for a more popular thing like voting?

Registration here requires drivers license info, or a state ID if one does not drive, and there is a lot of verification on that. In order to get my kid's ID, a lot of documentation is required, even year book photographs. It's best to get all of this during the time a person is involved in public school, and have modern documents.

I wish the government would combine a course in civics and how laws are made and the way the three branches of government work in the last semester of school. If the student passes the course they should be handed their registration application right then and there with someone to help them fill it out, if we are serious about the vote in this country.

Okay, even if they flunk the course, they will have been told a little bit, instead of learning it from media. The things I've read in the last year have almost convinced me the American people are not capable of being citizens anymore.



In almost every case of those older or who can't go the driver's license route, they have a social security number. That is a trusted data base, and why I laugh at some of what I read somedays.

If it's good enough for your company, landlord, mortage lender, property tax office, driver license, IRS, auto and healthcare insurers, pension funds, college, other schools, banks, ISP, telephone, cellphone, and dozens of other things we take for granted every day, why not make it the gold standard for voting?

I don't have to show or write down all of that when I mail my ballot. I just have to sign it, give a telephone number in case there's a problem, my street address, etc. They have all of that information on file.

The way the GOP is doing their best, with hate filled hearts to deny the 'peaceful revolution' of voting, is idiotic. The data is there, somewhere. They are obstructing the truth of who we are.

Thinking of the public workers and officials, military folks, active and current, denied their vote over technicalities, is outrageous. The reason I bring up the NCLB, the recruiting, veterans and people in the armed forces, is the same reason I spent my summers in my city's streets and parks to get people to go for this:

Twenty-sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Congress and the state legislatures felt increasing pressure to pass the Constitutional amendment because of the Vietnam War, in which many young men who were ineligible to vote were conscripted to fight in the war, thus lacking any means to influence the people sending them off to risk their lives. "Old enough to fight, old enough to vote," was a common slogan used by proponents of lowering the voting age. The slogan traced its roots to World War II, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt lowered the military draft age to eighteen.

On March 10, 1971, the Senate voted 94–0 in favor of proposing a Constitutional amendment to guarantee that the voting age could not be higher than 18.[11] On March 23, 1971, the House of Representatives voted 401–19 in favor of the proposed amendment.[12] Within four months after the Congress submitted it to the states, the amendment was ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures, the shortest time in which any proposed amendment has received the number of ratifications needed for adoption.

On July 5, 1971, during the amendment's signing ceremony in the East Room, President Richard Nixon talked about his confidence in the youth of America.

'As I meet with this group today, I sense that we can have confidence that America’s new voters, America’s young generation, will provide what America needs as we approach our 200th birthday, not just strength and not just wealth but the “Spirit of ‘76’ a spirit of moral courage, a spirit of high idealism in which we believe in the American dream, but in which we realize that the American dream can never be fulfilled until every American has an equal chance to fulfill it in his own life.'[13]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

This goes to the heart of the matter, that even old Tricky Dick knew. The Tea Party Patriots and their bullying along with their Bircher pals, trying to bully anyone out of the right to vote is plain ANTI-AMERICAN. And denies us of the chance to make our nation be 'all that it can be.'

So I love the name of the proposed legislation and hope it passes quickly...



colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
7. This Makes So Much Sense
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 05:53 PM
Aug 2013

The right loves to wave the flag when they aren't thumping the Bible, what's more patriotic than voting - and what's less patriotic than trying to keep people from voting.

In a true democracy we should make it as easy as possible to vote.

Being white and living in a mostly white, conservative suburb of Columbus there is no wait voting, plenty of working machines. Go to a poor area and they usually have one machine that seems to be on the fritz a lot.

We need to get real about voting districts but getting more people able and willing to vote can be a big help.

Now if we only had a real democratic party, not the current republican lite party.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
8. Also, the Supreme Court left Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act intact
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 07:35 PM
Aug 2013


Fri Jul 12, 2013

-snip-

June saw the gutting of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court collaterally attacked Section 5 of the VRA, which requires preclearance of voting and elections laws by states such as Texas, by striking down Section 4. By declaring Section 4 unconstitutional, the Court made it impossible to apply the Section 5 preclearance requirement.

Initial reaction focused on the presumptive death of the VRA and the almost certain enactment and implementation of discriminatory voting laws, yet much of that initial analysis neglected Section 3 of the VRA.

On Tuesday, Sahil Kapur wrote in TalkingPointsMemo that Texas and other states could still be subjected to preclearance requirements, despite the Court's June ruling.

"Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act lets courts add a state or local government to the preclearance requirement if it is found to have enacted intentionally discriminatory voting measures. The Supreme Court left that part of the Voting Rights Act intact; it invalidated Section 4, which includes the formula that Congress established to determine which state and local governments are to face that extra scrutiny automatically."


-snip-

Full article here: http://www.burntorangereport.com/diary/13777/experts-texas-possibly-subject-to-preclearance-under-voting-rights-act-suits-filed


winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
13. The 50 state strategy was one of the smartest things the Party ever did.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 08:42 PM
Aug 2013

Letting it fall by the wayside really pissed me off.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic Push For Votin...