Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PearliePoo2

(7,768 posts)
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 02:00 PM Aug 2013

Breaking: Washington’s pot law won’t get federal challenge

The federal government will not try to block Washington state’s marijuana legalization law, Gov. Jay Inslee announced Thursday morning.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder delivered his long-awaited decision on a potential challenge in a phone call with Inslee earlier Thursday, the governor said in a news release.

“Attorney General Holder made it clear the federal government will continue to enforce the federal Controlled Substance Act by focusing its enforcement on eight specific concerns, including the prevention of distribution to minors and the importance of keeping Washington-grown marijuana within our state’s borders,” Inslee said. “We share those concerns and are confident our state initiative will be implemented as planned.”

Colorado’s legalization law will also stand, Inslee said.

Inslee and Attorney General Bob Ferguson scheduled a news conference for 11:30 a.m. to discuss the news.

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2013/08/washingtons-pot-law-wont-get-federal-challenge/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: Washington’s pot law won’t get federal challenge (Original Post) PearliePoo2 Aug 2013 OP
Great, thanks for the news. nt uppityperson Aug 2013 #1
Good to hear. The voter suppression cases will need Holder's time. nt SunSeeker Aug 2013 #2
Does that mean just the current DOJ admin won't make federal challenges or HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #3
It means I believe it will be revisited whenever they want, by both current and future Admins. Dragonfli Aug 2013 #4
That's sorta what I expected...it's temporary relief at best HereSince1628 Aug 2013 #5

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
3. Does that mean just the current DOJ admin won't make federal challenges or
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 02:07 PM
Aug 2013

does this mark a decision that won't be revisited and possibly reversed by future administrations?

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
4. It means I believe it will be revisited whenever they want, by both current and future Admins.
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 02:29 PM
Aug 2013

If Holder were serious he would petition the DEA to reschedule Marijuana at the very least, under the Governments own definitions and rules it has never met the criteria for schedule one and is only classified that way for political and financial reasons (lots of money to be made off the failed war on some drugs)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Removal_of_cannabis_from_Schedule_I_of_the_Controlled_Substances_Act

Such would at least be an honest attempt by the DOJ to bring the federal criminal status of MJ users to a saner more realistic legal ground.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
5. That's sorta what I expected...it's temporary relief at best
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 02:32 PM
Aug 2013

At worst it allows citizens to entrap themselves thinking their MJ association is sanctioned.

One day the DEA shows up and OOPS! yer ass is IN the can.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Washington’s po...