Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 11:26 AM Aug 2013

Obama is way out on a limb right now

What about Poland?

The administration made a judgment that there is no doubt that the Assad regime carried out the chemical attacks near Damascus on August 21st, and they announced that judgment to the world. Nonetheless, the British Parliament was not satisfied with the evidence. Or, at least, many members of parliament were unconvinced. Perhaps others simply didn't want to get their country entangled in a civil war. But one thing is now clear, the case that has been presented to the public is not good enough. That puts the administration in a bad place, but they were hasty and they will now pay the price for that.

With news that President Obama could order unilateral strikes as soon as the United Nations weapons inspectors leave on Saturday, I'm concerned that the administration is getting ready to be hasty again. I hope they have some way of knowing what the inspectors are discovering about the nature of the chemical that was used, as well as the delivery system. We supposedly know a decent amount about what kinds of chemicals the Syrians have in their stockpiles, and we know what kind of artillery pieces they use. If we attack and then discover that neither the chemical agent nor the weaponry match what is in Syria's inventory, we are going to look very bad.

I understand the importance of the principle the president is trying to uphold, and I'd like to be able to support him. But he's way out on a limb right now. He doesn't have support from the British, from NATO, from the United Nations, or from the Arab League. One reason is that people have difficulty believing that we can strike Syria in a very limited way and then walk away even as Assad remains in power and on the offensive on most fronts of the civil war. Another reason is the evidence presented so far is paltry.

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2013/8/30/10536/9036
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama is way out on a limb right now (Original Post) phantom power Aug 2013 OP
Yep, what the hell is the point of a "shot across the bow?" David__77 Aug 2013 #1
That phrase is doublespeak too... "shot across the bow" is a miss bobduca Aug 2013 #3
Barbara Lee marions ghost Aug 2013 #2

David__77

(23,386 posts)
1. Yep, what the hell is the point of a "shot across the bow?"
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 12:19 PM
Aug 2013

It would only make the US look foolish, plus saddle this country with the outcome, no matter how terrible, of the entire civil war. And if the US actually "went in," then we're talking more thousands of US dead. Those reading this: do you want this?

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
3. That phrase is doublespeak too... "shot across the bow" is a miss
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 12:24 PM
Aug 2013

the equivalent would be shooting a cruise missile across their country and making it land in uninhabited ocean or desert.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama is way out on a lim...