Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:14 PM Aug 2013

Jimmy Carter: Would be illegal under international law.

CNN

Also Friday, another Obama predecessor, former President Jimmy Carter, said "a punitive military response without a U.N. Security Council mandate or broad support from NATO and the Arab League would be illegal under international law and unlikely to alter the course of the war."

http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/article/332930/250/Obama-No-boots-on-the-ground-in-Syria

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jimmy Carter: Would be illegal under international law. (Original Post) dkf Aug 2013 OP
I agree with Pres. Carter gopiscrap Aug 2013 #1
Ed Schultz is laying out the illegality of this under international law Cleita Aug 2013 #2
Statement From The Carter Center on the Syria Crisis ProSense Aug 2013 #3
Thanks I was looking for where this came from. dkf Aug 2013 #4
Good find TomClash Aug 2013 #6
Thank you, President Carter. woo me with science Aug 2013 #5

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
2. Ed Schultz is laying out the illegality of this under international law
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:22 PM
Aug 2013

and our Constitution right now.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. Statement From The Carter Center on the Syria Crisis
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:23 PM
Aug 2013
Statement From The Carter Center on the Syria Crisis

ATLANTA....The use of chemical weapons on August 21 near Damascus is a grave breach of international law that has rightfully outraged the world community. The United States and some of its European allies are calling for military strikes on Syria, but apparently without support from NATO or the Arab League. Predictably, Russia, Iran, and Syria are predicting dire consequences. At Syria's invitation, a U.N. investigation is already underway and will soon make its report. A punitive military response without a U.N. Security Council mandate or broad support from NATO and the Arab League would be illegal under international law and unlikely to alter the course of the war. It will only harden existing positions and postpone a sorely needed political process to put an end to the catastrophic violence. Instead, all should seek to leverage the consensus among the entire international community, including Russia and Iran, condemning the use of chemical weapons in Syria and bringing under U.N. oversight the country's stockpile of such weapons.

"It is imperative to determine the facts of the attack and present them to the public. Those responsible for the use of chemical weapons must bear personal responsibility," said President Carter. "The chemical attack should be a catalyst for redoubling efforts to convene a peace conference, to end hostilities, and urgently to find a political solution."

http://www.cartercenter.org/news/pr/syria-083013.html

Excellent overall statement.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
4. Thanks I was looking for where this came from.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:28 PM
Aug 2013

Only came up with the clip I found.

I agree with that entire statement 100%. This should be the goal and the structure of the response.

Hastily moving only weakens the moral authority needed to truly confront chemical weapons.

I hope Obama comes to his senses and I hope you support his doing so.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jimmy Carter: Would be ...