Freeper Hypocrisy on Syria

[kalisto2010]

Just look at the comments on this thread. They now say the exact opposite now that Obama is in office. That's why you can never win with Republicans, if you do, they just move the goal post.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1812491/posts


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1811715/posts


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1810440/posts


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1801802/posts


Heres's the index that covers Syria during the Bush years, when the Republicans considered him a terrorist. Now he's their freedom fighter. This post is for you vile little Freeper trolls. This goes to show you how batshit insane you really are.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/assad/index?more=5143372

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1752928/posts

[alphafemale]

1. I've seen some right-wing postings of support of anti-war protests.

Irony is delightful at times.

[kalisto2010]

3. That was the biggest shock to me!

Republicans are now the anti-war party. I'm sure it's not because Obama is in office, I'm sure they're doing based on their innate morals and general welfare of the Syrian people.

[B Calm]

2. I can't handle all the misspelled words.

[leftyohiolib]

4. tag

[David__77]

5. If they can convince the Republicans to vote against intervention, then that is great.

...

[SummerSnow]

6. If Obama was against going into Syria , The House and Senate would whine ...

that Obama is weak. Like their motto says, " If Obama is for it they are against it and vice versa"


Does anyone think that Congress will demand undeniable proof of the cause for a strike against Syria?

[gopiscrap]

7. How can you stand going over to that slime pool