Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:36 AM Sep 2013

So, how many countries have asked the US to bomb Syria as punishment?


I wouldn't be as opposed to this proposed punishment if Obama/Kerry would at least give us a list of the countries that would do the bombings themselves if they had the means.

But proposing unilateral action, or worse, presuming to act on behalf of the world when the world hasn't even weighed in, is unacceptable.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, how many countries have asked the US to bomb Syria as punishment? (Original Post) reformist2 Sep 2013 OP
Marshall Islands and Guam ? dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #1
Syria is 1 of 5 countries that has refused to be a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention. randome Sep 2013 #2
Lnadmines, clusterbombs and DU Arctic Dave Sep 2013 #5
Agreed. Unfortunately, no one can do that. randome Sep 2013 #6
And which international treaties have we refused to sign? hobbit709 Sep 2013 #7
161 Countries have signed the Mine Ban Treaty, the US is one of 36 to refuse and insist upon using Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #9
I would speculate... HooptieWagon Sep 2013 #3
don't forget Poland KG Sep 2013 #4
Palau, obviously. Arctic Dave Sep 2013 #8
Nobody expects Palau. La Cucaracha Sep 2013 #11
Micronesia is always on board. Coalition DirkGently Sep 2013 #10
Good question gopiscrap Sep 2013 #12
Monaco and Naura stand ready SummerSnow Sep 2013 #13
Latvia's ready to go. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #14
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
2. Syria is 1 of 5 countries that has refused to be a signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:39 AM
Sep 2013
(Angola, North Korea, Egypt, South Sudan and Syria).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_Weapons_Convention

For that reason alone, they (as well as Egypt and the rest) should be forced to step in line. There is a reason the other 189 countries signed.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
6. Agreed. Unfortunately, no one can do that.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:44 AM
Sep 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
7. And which international treaties have we refused to sign?
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:46 AM
Sep 2013

Starting with Cluster Bombs and going from there.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
9. 161 Countries have signed the Mine Ban Treaty, the US is one of 36 to refuse and insist upon using
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:47 AM
Sep 2013

mines which blow people to bits years after the US has left the warzone and gone home. There is a reason the other 161 have signed it.
Here are the 36 nations with whom we keep company in the use of vicious weaponry banned by all of our peer nations.
http://www.icbl.org/index.php/icbl/Universal/MBT/States-Not-Party

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
3. I would speculate...
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 10:42 AM
Sep 2013

That there is behind the scenes lobbying from Saudi Arabia and Israel to bomb Syria. SA because they are funding and arming the AQ rebels, and Israel because the Assad regime is a long time enemy.
The majority of countries probably wouldn't touch Syria with a ten-foot pole. Its a Tarbaby....once involved, you'll have a devil of a time unsticking yourself.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
14. Latvia's ready to go.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:07 AM
Sep 2013

Just let us know when you need the tables and chairs set up. Anything that lets us stick it to those Russian dickfaces.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, how many countries ha...