Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhose asessment of the Syrian gas attack would you trust most?
Which of the following have the most credibility in this matter?
6 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
President Obama | |
0 (0%) |
|
Congress | |
0 (0%) |
|
Putin | |
0 (0%) |
|
Syrian spokespeople | |
0 (0%) |
|
UN | |
4 (67%) |
|
Former secular leader of Iran | |
0 (0%) |
|
Some person on the Internet | |
1 (17%) |
|
Other (please elaborate below) | |
1 (17%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whose asessment of the Syrian gas attack would you trust most? (Original Post)
MannyGoldstein
Sep 2013
OP
atreides1
(16,076 posts)1. Definitely the UN
Considering that some of the same "intel" people were around before the US attacked Iraq, and that American intelligence gathering is mainly done by frat boys sitting at a keyboard in a cubicle!
Not feeling a lot of trust here!
Iggo
(47,552 posts)2. After all the recent bullshit?
Nobody.
That particular ship has sailed.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)3. Hans Blix. He was right last time, even begged bush to look at facts.
Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)4. None of the above.
Unfortunately.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)5. Kick