General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhile we're on the subject of wills, if you have any assets and want to leave them
to a particular person(s), you better have one.
I heard years ago, that in SC if a man was married and the couple had no children, if he died without a will,
his brothers and sisters could get some of his estate. I don't know if this is still the case, but anyway,
I'd say better find out what your state laws are like if you don't have a will and have some assets.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)....is it unusual for the executor of an elderly person's will to be the one who has power of attorney for medical decisions AND be the beneficiary of the substantial estate?
Heddi
(18,312 posts)Medical POA doesn't give anyone any financial control, jjust the ability to make medical decisions if the person is unable to make the decisions themselves.
I am my mother's sole heir, I am her POA medical/financial and the only beneficiary. Granted, she never has more than $10 to her name, so I'm not looking at inheriting a Hearst-like empire, but still
My husband's eldest sister is the executrix of her dad's estate, medical POA and one of several beneficiaries of the will.
elleng
(130,895 posts)especially if not many close relatives, but obviously opens the door to questions. Beneficiary should NOT have been the witness to signing of the Will.
leftstreet
(36,108 posts)But no, it's not unusual at all
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)She also had financial control and paid all his bills for him. If he couldn't have made medical decisions it would have been up to her as well, but he was competent until the very end. She was one of five children and in the best position to do the roles.
I am one of three children and my mother's power of attorney (legal & medical) and executor when that comes to pass.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)That's what's interesting to me. The elderly person in question has no living chilldren, just lots of nieces and nephews and one older sister. The one niece who is the executor and who has POA has arranged to be the sole beneficiary of the estate, which is about $400,000. Interestingly enough, I have observed her discouraging the aunt from spending money on such things as a walker, which she needs quite badly. She is using a hand-me-down old ratty walker that she has to drag along and that is putting her in danger.
Bunnahabhain
(857 posts)Durable Medical Equipment that is medically necessary. There is no need for her to buy a walker, and besides, a good walker only runs $150-200. Either way, if I was as concerned as you, I would go get the poor thing a walker on my own dime.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)My husband's mother moved to Alaska to be close to us in her later years, and my husband took care of all her finances, medical issues, etc. He was also the executor of her will. He split the estate (which wasn't a whole lot) equally between him and his two siblings, even though his mom had only wanted to leave his sister $100 since they had had "issues." My husband's sense of fairness wouldn't allow that, so she got the same as he and his brother.
I've drafted lots of wills in my life, and it's fairly common for the executor and POA to be one and the same.
Nay
(12,051 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Grandmother, was not hard to do and the lawyers had no problems doing it.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)but from what I gather so far, only Louisiana has laws that could have the effect you describe. All other 49 have direct inheritance of all assets to the spouse in the event of intestacy.
I'm also being told repeatedly that the best form of ensuring inheritance is to set up a trust. No will, no contest.
elleng
(130,895 posts)'Transfer on Death' vehicles.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)unless it's changed in community property states. My understanding from estates thirty years ago that if they die intestate, the surviving spouse keeps their half of community property, the other half is divided by the direct heirs, that is, children Unless There Is A Will Specifying Who Receives the deceased's half of the community property (the surviving spouse).
I don't know of any children who've tossed a parent out of a house trying to claim their share of property, though.
Please let me know if I'm out of date, though.
Bunnahabhain
(857 posts)Concerning children tossing parents out. It's the advice I give people all the time.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Bunnahabhain
(857 posts)Now go buy that poor woman a walker.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Just gaslighted.
Bunnahabhain
(857 posts)She is being advised against her best interests not to spend the money. However, I was not using the word "poor" in that sense. I can see, based on your initial reply to me, you tend to think in concrete operational terms. In the context the word "poor" was used it connotes "eliciting or deserving pity." Help the poor thing out.
last1standing
(11,709 posts)While most states have laws forcing half of the decedent's estate transfer to the spouse, I don't think it's the general rule that half goes to the children when there is a living spouse. The obvious reason for this is that it would leave many spouses destitute and also most assets between the average couple (excluding the one percent) tend to be covered under the laws of joint tenancy (real property, bank accounts, etc...).
If you find differently, please let me know.
1-Old-Man
(2,667 posts)In West Virginia if a (married) man with children dies and has not made a will his wife gets nothing and his entire estate is divided between the children.
All adults need to write a will. Hell, you can get blanks on line and fill them out in minutes. Print the thing and then sign it in front of a Notary with the requisite number of witnesses, I think this state required 3, and their addresses.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Dont get legal advice from a web forum
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Trusts do that.